scholarly journals Socio-economic differences in the change of fruit and vegetable intakes among Dutch adults between 2004 and 2011: the GLOBE study

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1704-1716 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Coosje Dijkstra ◽  
Judith E Neter ◽  
Ingeborg A Brouwer ◽  
Martijn Huisman ◽  
Marjolein Visser ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate socio-economic differences in changes in fruit and vegetable intake between 2004 and 2011 and explore the mediating role of financial barriers in this change.DesignRespondents completed a self-reported questionnaire in 2004 and 2011, including questions on fruit and vegetable intake (frequency per week), indicators of socio-economic position (education, income) and perceived financial barriers (fruits/vegetables are expensive, financial distress). Associations were analysed using ordinal logistic regression. The mediating role of financial barriers in the association between socio-economic position and change in fruit and vegetable intake was studied with the Baron and Kenny approach.SettingLongitudinal GLOBE study.SubjectsA total of 2978 Dutch adults aged 25–75 years.ResultsRespondents with the lowest income in 2004 were more likely to report a decrease in intake of cooked vegetables (P-trend<0·001) and raw vegetables (P-trend<0·001) between 2004 and 2011, compared with those with the highest income level. Respondents with the lowest education level in 2004 were more likely to report a decrease in intake of fruits (P-trend=0·021), cooked vegetables (P-trend=0·033), raw vegetables (P-trend<0·001) and fruit juice (P-trend=0·027) between 2004 and 2011, compared with those with the highest education level. Financial barriers partially mediated the association between income and education and the decrease in fruit and cooked vegetable intake between 2004 and 2011.ConclusionsThese results show a widening of relative income and educational differences in fruit and vegetable intake between 2004 and 2011. Financial barriers explained a small part of this widening.

Nutrition ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Guerra ◽  
Andrea Ticinesi ◽  
Franca Allegri ◽  
Antonio Nouvenne ◽  
Beatrice Prati ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thea Suldrup Jørgensen ◽  
Mette Rasmussen ◽  
Anne Kristine Aarestrup ◽  
Annette Kjær Ersbøll ◽  
Sanne Ellegaard Jørgensen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-31
Author(s):  
D. A Johnson ◽  
G. Divine ◽  
G. Alexander ◽  
S. Rolnick ◽  
J. Calvi ◽  
...  

Appetite ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate E. McSpadden ◽  
Heather Patrick ◽  
April Y. Oh ◽  
Amy L. Yaroch ◽  
Laura A. Dwyer ◽  
...  

Appetite ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 105283
Author(s):  
Daniela Craveiro ◽  
Sibila Marques ◽  
Iva Zvěřinová ◽  
Vojtěch Máca ◽  
Milan Ščasný ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiana Miewald ◽  
David Holben ◽  
Peter Hall

Purpose: We examined whether participation in a food box program has a positive effect on fruit and vegetable consumption and food security. Methods: Participants and nonparticipants in a food box program were surveyed to determine differences between the two groups and change over time. Results: Fruit and vegetable intake declined in those who left the program after several months, and intake of fruit, carrots, and vegetables was lower among those who had left than among those who remained in the program. Food insecurity was associated with lower intakes of fruit and vegetables. Conclusions: Participation in a food box program can provide some benefit in terms of increased fruit and vegetable consumption for those who use the program regularly. Increasing the frequency of the box and encouraging continued use may improve these effects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 829-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Benton ◽  
Hayley A Young

Abstract Although there is strong evidence that consumption of fruit and vegetables is associated with a reduced rate of all-cause mortality, only a minority of the population consumes 5 servings a day, and campaigns to increase intake have had limited success. This review examines whether encouraging the consumption of fruit juice might offer a step toward the 5-a-day target. Reasons given for not consuming whole fruit involve practicalities, inconvenience, and the effort required. Psychologically, what is important is not only basic information about health, but how individuals interpret their ability to implement that information. It has been argued that fruit juice avoids the problems that commonly prevent fruit consumption and thus provides a practical means of increasing intake and benefitting health through an approach with which the population can readily engage. Those arguing against consuming fruit juice emphasize that it is a source of sugar lacking fiber, yet juice provides nutrients such as vitamin C, carotenoids, and polyphenols that offer health-related benefits. Actively encouraging the daily consumption of fruit juice in public health policy could help populations achieve the 5-a-day recommendation for fruit and vegetable intake.


Appetite ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Carfora ◽  
D. Caso ◽  
M. Conner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document