scholarly journals Quantitative Annular Dark-Field Imaging at Atomic Resolution

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (S3) ◽  
pp. 304-305
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Yamashita ◽  
Shogo Koshiya ◽  
Kazuo Ishizuka ◽  
Koji Kimoto
2016 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Beyer ◽  
Jürgen Belz ◽  
Nikolai Knaub ◽  
Kakhaber Jandieri ◽  
Kerstin Volz

Author(s):  
Shunsuke Yamashita ◽  
Shogo Koshiya ◽  
Kazuo Ishizuka ◽  
Koji Kimoto

Microscopy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 409-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Yamashita ◽  
Shogo Koshiya ◽  
Takuro Nagai ◽  
Jun Kikkawa ◽  
Kazuo Ishizuka ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 344-345
Author(s):  
G. Möbus ◽  
R.E. Dunin-Borkowski ◽  
C.J.D. Hethėrington ◽  
J.L. Hutchison

Introduction:Atomically resolved chemical analysis using techniques such as electron energy loss spectroscopy and annular dark field imaging relies on the ability to form a well-characterised sub-nm electron beam in a FEGTEM/STEM [1-2]. to understand EELS+EDX-signal formation upon propagation of a sub-nm beam through materials we first have to assess precisely the beam intensity distribution in vacuum and find conditions for the best obtainable resolution.Experimental Details:Modern TEM/STEM instruments combine features of both imaging and scanning technology. The beam forming capability approaches closely that for dedicated STEMs, while CCD recording devices allow us to measure the beam profile by direct imaging at magnifications up to 1.5 M. The recording of a “z-section” series through the 3D intensity distribution of the cross-over can therefore be realised by recording of a “condenser focal series”.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1082-1083
Author(s):  
D Masiel ◽  
B Reed ◽  
T LaGrange ◽  
ND Browning

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2009 in Richmond, Virginia, USA, July 26 – July 30, 2009


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document