scholarly journals A flexible protocol for a systematic review of remote patient monitoring

Author(s):  
Ashley Elizabeth Muller ◽  
Rigmor C. Berg

Abstract Background: Norway is interested in implementing remote patient monitoring (RPM) within primary health services. This systematic review will first identify the types of RPM that are of interest to Norwegian health authorities, then synthesize the effects of RPM on clinical health and health service utilization outcomes among adults with chronic diseases. Methods: We will perform systematic literature searches in multiple databases, using RPM-related searches, such as telemedicine, telemonitoring, and eHealth. Based on what research exists, the review will be selected from a cascading menu of review types. Methodological quality will be assessed through appropriate checklists, while the quality of the evidence will be assessed through Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Discussion: This flexible protocol specifies the production of different possible types of reviews of RPM. It is anticipated that the results of the review will inform the development of effective RPM programs to the most appropriate chronic disease groups.

2017 ◽  
pp. 1183-1215
Author(s):  
Lea Skorin-Kapov ◽  
Ognjen Dobrijevic ◽  
Domagoj Piplica

The applicability of advanced mobile technologies in the m-Health domain has led to a number of studies and (limited) commercial products supporting delivery of health services to remote users. A key issue regarding successful delivery and acceptance of such services is meeting their Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE) requirements, focusing on technical aspects and end user perceived quality, respectively. In this paper, the authors address the topic of evaluating QoE for non-emergency remote patient monitoring services. They identify relevant QoE influence factors and metrics, and present the results of a QoE evaluation study, whereby they focus on usability aspects. The study involves 26 users testing a prototype version of the Ericsson Mobile Health service, which is based on a smartphone application and measurement of vital signs via medical sensors. The results show a strong correlation between QoE and: perceived effectiveness of the mobile interface (regarding both adequacy of smartphone screen size and smartphone application navigational support), perceived ease of conducting a blood pressure measurement task, and user motivation for service usage.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 59-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Skorin-Kapov ◽  
Ognjen Dobrijevic ◽  
Domagoj Piplica

The applicability of advanced mobile technologies in the m-Health domain has led to a number of studies and (limited) commercial products supporting delivery of health services to remote users. A key issue regarding successful delivery and acceptance of such services is meeting their Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE) requirements, focusing on technical aspects and end user perceived quality, respectively. In this paper, the authors address the topic of evaluating QoE for non-emergency remote patient monitoring services. They identify relevant QoE influence factors and metrics, and present the results of a QoE evaluation study, whereby they focus on usability aspects. The study involves 26 users testing a prototype version of the Ericsson Mobile Health service, which is based on a smartphone application and measurement of vital signs via medical sensors. The results show a strong correlation between QoE and: perceived effectiveness of the mobile interface (regarding both adequacy of smartphone screen size and smartphone application navigational support), perceived ease of conducting a blood pressure measurement task, and user motivation for service usage.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keshia R. De Guzman ◽  
Centaine L. Snoswell ◽  
Monica L. Taylor ◽  
Leonard C. Gray ◽  
Liam J. Caffery

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok Vegesna ◽  
Melody Tran ◽  
Michele Angelaccio ◽  
Steve Arcona

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Salehi ◽  
Alireza Olyaeemanesh ◽  
Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh ◽  
Ensieh Nasli-Esfahani ◽  
Hossein Riazi

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e051844
Author(s):  
Emma E Thomas ◽  
Monica L Taylor ◽  
Annie Banbury ◽  
Centaine L Snoswell ◽  
Helen M Haydon ◽  
...  

ObjectivesOur recent systematic review determined that remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions can reduce acute care use. However, effectiveness varied within and between populations. Clinicians, researchers, and policymakers require more than evidence of effect; they need guidance on how best to design and implement RPM interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to explore these results further to (1) identify factors of RPM interventions that relate to increased and decreased acute care use and (2) develop recommendations for future RPM interventions.DesignRealist review—a qualitative systematic review method which aims to identify and explain why intervention results vary in different situations. We analysed secondarily 91 studies included in our previous systematic review that reported on RPM interventions and the impact on acute care use. Online databases PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched in October 2020. Included studies were published in English during 2015–2020 and used RPM to monitor an individual’s biometric data (eg, heart rate, blood pressure) from a distance.Primary and secondary outcome measuresContextual factors and potential mechanisms that led to variation in acute care use (hospitalisations, length of stay or emergency department presentations).ResultsAcross a range of RPM interventions 31 factors emerged that impact the effectiveness of RPM innovations on acute care use. These were synthesised into six theories of intervention success: (1) targeting populations at high risk; (2) accurately detecting a decline in health; (3) providing responsive and timely care; (4) personalising care; (5) enhancing self-management, and (6) ensuring collaborative and coordinated care.ConclusionWhile RPM interventions are complex, if they are designed with patients, providers and the implementation setting in mind and incorporate the key variables identified within this review, it is more likely that they will be effective at reducing acute hospital events.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020142523.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Morosetti ◽  
Maria Iolanda Famà

Abstract Background and Aims Home dialysis (both extracorporeal and peritoneal) can improve the management and the quality of life of patients affected by end stage renal disease. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) can improve the care of Patients in home dialysis: RPM may detect early problems, ensure compliance and give both clinicians and patients a sense of reassurance regarding the clinical management. These advantages may translate into improved outcomes and increased uptake on home dialysis therapies. For these reasons, the Doctor Plus® NEPHRO program has been created. Clinical and social advantages derived from remote patient monitoring by the Doctor Plus® NEPHRO program versus the standard of care were evaluated. Method Patients included in the remote monitoring program, by the Nephrology Unit of ASL 3 in Rome (Italy), from July 2017 and April 2019, were analyzed. Each patient was observed for at least 4 months, up to 22 months. Patients received a Doctor Plus® NEPHRO KIT composed by clinical devices to measure systolic and diastolic pressure, heart rate, body weight and oximetry. Clinical data were automatically sent from electronic devices to the HUB included into the provided KIT and from the HUB to the Vree Platform operating at the Nephrology Unit. All devices, included HUB and Vree Platform, were classified as medical device class IIa. The SF-12 questionnaire was also administered by remote nurses and the level of satisfaction with the program Doctor Plus® NEPHRO was evaluated. Results We observed 16 patients (56,3% males, mean age 62 years), 14 in Peritoneal Dialysis and 2 in Home Hemodialysis. A total number of 35.720 clinical measures were collected during the observational period. During this length time, systolic pressure was reduced in 69% of patients and diastolic pressure was reduced in 62,5% of patients. Systolic pressure decreased from 137,8 to 130,2 mmHg (p<0,0002) and diastolic pressure decreased from 80,5 to 76 mmHg (p>0,0002). Mean heart rate decreased in 50% of patients from 69,4 bpm to 68,8 bpm (p<0,0046). During the same period, clinical monitoring generated 58 early clinical interventions: 11 non planned visits at Nephrological Centre and 47 calls from nephrologist to patients (0,5 visits per month and 2,2 calls per month). In 35 cases pharmacological therapy has been modified (in 80% of cases treatment modified was the hypertension therapy). Due to the increase of clinical monitoring, Patients accesses to ER are decreased of 29%. SF-12 questionnaire showed an improvement in the perceived health status in all patients. Reduction of 15% in workdays lost were registered in both patients and caregivers. Conclusion Doctor Plus® NEPHRO resulted as a useful tool for the Nephrology Center in order to monitor patients who performed home dialysis. Data collected by the remote monitoring program have shown an improvement in clinical outcomes and the possibility to prevent some clinical complications thus reducing clinical emergencies and the hospitalization rate. Moreover, the possibility for patients and caregivers to complain with morbidity remaining in a home setting, results in the improvement in quality of life. Finally, the possibility to avoid hospitalizations, emergency accesses and transfers to hemodialysis is important for cost saving with a more appropriate use of healthcare resources.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarosław Jankowski ◽  
Stanisław Saganowski ◽  
Piotr Bródka

Today, in the digital age, the mobile devices are more and more used to aid people in the struggle to improve or maintain their health. In this paper, the mobile eHealth solution for remote patient monitoring during clinical trials is presented, together with the outcomes of quantitative and qualitative performance evaluation. The evaluation is a third step to improve the quality of the application after earlier Good Clinical Practice certification and validation with the participation of 10 patients and 3 general practitioners. This time the focus was on the usability which was evaluated by the seventeen participants divided into three age groups (18–28, 29–50, and 50+). The results, from recorded sessions and the eye tracking, show that there is no difference in performance between the first group and the second group, while for the third group the performance was worse; however, it was still good enough to complete task within reasonable time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document