scholarly journals Formation of cold clumps and filaments around superbubbles

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (A29B) ◽  
pp. 231-231
Author(s):  
E. Ntormousi ◽  
P. Hennebelle ◽  
J. Dawson ◽  
F. Del Sordo

AbstractThe majority of young massive stars are found in close binary systems. Recently, dedicated observing campaigns have provided strong constraints on the binary fraction as well as the distribution of the parameters that characterize the binary systems: the masses of both components, the orbital period and eccentricities. Most strikingly these findings imply that the majority of massive stars experience strong interaction (roche lobe overflow, a common envelope phase and or a merger) with a binary companion before their final explosion. I will discuss recent results from detailed binary star models and population synthesis models.

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (A29B) ◽  
pp. 208-208
Author(s):  
Selma de Mink

AbstractThe majority of young massive stars are found in close binary systems. Recently, dedicated observingcampaigns have provided strong constraints on the binary fraction as well as the distribution of the parameters thatcharacterize the binary systems: the masses of both components, the orbital period and eccentricities. Most strikinglythese findings imply that the majority of massive stars experience strong interaction (roche lobe overflow, a commonenvelope phase and or a merger) with a binary companion before their final explosion. I will discuss recent resultsfrom detailed binary star models and population synthesis models.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (S283) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Izzard ◽  
Philip D. Hall ◽  
Thomas M. Tauris ◽  
Christopher A. Tout

AbstractMany binary star systems are not wide enough to contain the progenitor stars from which they were made. One explanation for this is that when one star becomes a red giant a common envelope forms around both stars in the binary system. The core of the giant and its companion star continue to orbit one another inside the envelope. Frictional energy deposited into the common envelope may lead to its ejection and, if so, a close binary system is formed from the core of the former giant star and its relatively untouched companion. When the primary is an asymptotic giant branch star the core becomes a hot carbon-oxygen white dwarf which may ionise the ejected envelope and illuminate a planetary nebula. Many other types of binary systems form through common envelope evolution such as low-mass X-ray binaries and cataclysmic variables. In the case of a failed envelope ejection when the cores merge, rapidly-rotating solitary giants similar to FK Comae stars form. In this short review we focus on attempts to constrain parameters of common envelope evolution models and also describe the latest efforts to model this elusive phase of binary stellar evolution.


Galaxies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
R.E. Wilson

Development of analytic binary star models is discussed in historical and on-going perspective, beginning with an overview of paradigm shifts, the merits of direct (rectification-free) models, and fundamental four-type binary system morphology. Attention is called to the likelihood that many or even most cataclysmic variables may be of the double contact morphological type. Eclipsing binary distance estimates differ from those of standard candles in being individually measurable—without reliance on (usually nearby) objects that are assumed similar. Recent progress on circumstellar accretion disk models is briefly summarized, with emphasis on the separate roles of fluid dynamic, structural, and analytic models. Time-related parameters (ephemeris, apsidal motion, and light travel time) now can be found with a unified algorithm that processes light curves, velocity curves, and pre-existing eclipse timings together, without need to compute any new timings. Changes in data publication practices are recommended and logical errors and inconsistencies in terminology are noted. Parameter estimation strategies are discussed.


1979 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 421-424
Author(s):  
C. Firmani ◽  
G. Koenigsberger ◽  
G. F. Bisiacchi ◽  
E. Ruíz ◽  
A. Solar

The current ideas concerning the evolution of close binary systems (van den Heuvel, 1976), accepting the hypothesis that the system is not disrupted by the first supernova (SN) explosion, predict that the Wolf-Rayet phase can occur twice. The first time the companion of the WR star is a normal OB star and the second time it is a collapsed object. In this context, the importance of searching for binary systems with collapsed companions among the “single” WR stars is evident. Due to its large distance from the galactic plane, z = 280 pc (Smith, 1968a), when compared with the average height (z = 60 pc, Cruz-González et al., 1974) of extreme Population I stars, HD 50896 was considered to be a likely candidate to this type of system.


1982 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 129-131
Author(s):  
E.I. Popova ◽  
A.V. Tutukov ◽  
B.M. Shustov ◽  
L.R. Yungelson

About 60% of stars of the disc population in our Galaxy are close binary systems (CBS). Half of the known CBS are spectroscopic binary stars (Kraitcheva et al., 1978).To know the distribution of a correlation between the masses of CBS components and semiaxes of their orbits is necessary for the investigation of the origin and evolution of CBS. For such statistical investigations, a catalogue of CBS was compiled at the Astronomical Council. The catalogue is based on the 6th Batten catalogue (Batten, 1967), its extensions (Pedoussant and Ginestet, 1971; Pedoussant and Carquillat, 1973) and data published up to the end of 1980 (Popova et al., 1981). Now it is recorded on magnetic tape and contains data on 1041 spectroscopic binaries; 333 of them are stars with two visible spectra. The latter are mostly systems prior to mass exchange and the distribution of physical parameters in these systems reflects the distribution and presumably conditions at the time of formation. Using some assumptions, we can obtain for spectroscopic binaries masses of the components M1 and M2 (or the ratio q = M1/M2) and semiaxes of their orbits. Masses of components with the known sin i were obtained by the usual technique; when sin i was not known, masses were estimated from the spectra. We shall discuss here the distribution of CBS in the M-a plane.


2020 ◽  
Vol 497 (3) ◽  
pp. 4022-4029
Author(s):  
L A Almeida ◽  
E S Pereira ◽  
G M Borges ◽  
A Damineli ◽  
T A Michtchenko ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Eclipse timing variation analysis has become a powerful method to discover planets around binary systems. We applied this technique to investigate the eclipse times of GK Vir. This system is a post-common envelope binary with an orbital period of 8.26 h. Here, we present 10 new eclipse times obtained between 2013 and 2020. We calculated the O−C diagram using a linear ephemeris and verified a clear orbital period variation (OPV) with a cyclic behaviour. We investigated if this variation could be explained by the Applegate mechanism, the apsidal motion, or the light travel time (LTT) effect. We found that the Applegate mechanism would hardly explain the OPV with its current theoretical description. We obtained using different approaches that the apsidal motion is a less likely explanation than the LTT effect. We showed that the LTT effect with one circumbinary body is the most likely cause for the OPV, which was reinforced by the orbital stability of the third body. The LTT best solution provided an orbital period of ∼24 yr for the outer body. Under the assumption of coplanarity between the external body and the inner binary, we obtained a Jupiter-like planet around the GK Vir. In this scenario, the planet has one of the longest orbital periods, with a full observational baseline, discovered so far. However, as the observational baseline of GK Vir is smaller than twice the period found in the O−C diagram, the LTT solution must be taken as preliminary.


2018 ◽  
Vol 620 ◽  
pp. A42 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Völschow ◽  
D. R. G. Schleicher ◽  
R. Banerjee ◽  
J. H. M. M. Schmitt

Since its proposal in 1992, the Applegate mechanism has been discussed as a potential intrinsical mechanism to explain transit-timing variations in various types of close binary systems. Most analytical arguments presented so far focused on the energetic feasibility of the mechanism while applying rather crude one- or two-zone prescriptions to describe the exchange of angular momentum within the star. In this paper, we present the most detailed approach to date to describe the physics giving rise to the modulation period from kinetic and magnetic fluctuations. Assuming moderate levels of stellar parameter fluctuations, we find that the resulting binary period variations are one or two orders of magnitude lower than the observed values in RS-CVn like systems, supporting the conclusion of existing theoretical work that the Applegate mechanism may not suffice to produce the observed variations in these systems. The most promising Applegate candidates are low-mass post-common-envelope binaries with binary separations ≲1 R⊙ and secondary masses in the range of 0.30 M⊙ and 0.36 M⊙.


1988 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 238-239
Author(s):  
Yoji Osaki ◽  
Masahito Hirose

SU UMa stars are one of subclasses of dwarf novae. Dwarf novae are semi-detached close binary systems in which a Roche-lobe filling red dwarf secondary loses matter and the white dwarf primary accretes it through the accretion disk. The main characteristics of SU UMa subclass is that they show two kinds of outbursts: normal outbursts and superoutbursts. In addition to the more frequent narrow outbursts of normal dwarf nova, SU UMa stars exhibit “superoutbursts”, in which stars reach about 1 magnitude brighter and stay longer than in normal outburst. Careful photometric studies during superoutburst have almost always revealed the “superhumps”: periodic humps in light curves with a period very close to the orbital period of the system. However, the most curious of all is that this superhump period is not exactly equal to the orbital period, but it is always longer by a few percent than the orbital period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document