Influence of Drug–Silica Electrostatic Interactions on Drug Release from Mesoporous Silica-Based Oral Delivery Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 3435-3446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddhi S. Hate ◽  
Susan M. Reutzel-Edens ◽  
Lynne S. Taylor
Coatings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 781
Author(s):  
Sadaf Jamal Gilani ◽  
May Nasser Bin-Jumah ◽  
Syed Sarim Imam ◽  
Sultan Alshehri ◽  
Mohammed Asadullah Jahangir ◽  
...  

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...]


1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.C. Lavelle ◽  
S. Sharif ◽  
N.W. Thomas ◽  
J. Holland ◽  
S.S. Davis

2004 ◽  
Vol 277 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Morçöl ◽  
P Nagappan ◽  
L Nerenbaum ◽  
A Mitchell ◽  
S.J.D Bell

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 902-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Han ◽  
Zhonggao Gao ◽  
Liqing Chen ◽  
Lin Kang ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Vivek Trivedi ◽  
Ruchir Bhomia ◽  
John C Mitchell

Solid core drug delivery systems (SCDDS) were prepared for the oral delivery of biomolecules using mesoporous silica as core, bovine haemoglobin (bHb) as model drug and supercritical fluid (SCF) processing as encapsulation technique. The use of organic solvents or harsh processing conditions in the development of drug delivery systems for biomolecules can be detrimental for the structural integrity of the molecule. Hence, the coating on protein-immobilised particles was performed via supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) processing at a temperature lower than the melting point of myristic acid (MA) to avoid any thermal degradation of bHb. The SCDDS were prepared by bHb immobilisation on mesoporous silica followed by myristic acid (MA) coating at 43 °C and 100 bar in scCO2. bHb-immobilised silica particles were also coated via solvent evaporation (SE) to compare the protein release with scCO2 processed formulations. In both cases, MA coating provided required enteric protection and restricted the bHb release for the first two hours in simulated gastric fluid (SGF). The protein release was immediate upon the change of media to simulated intestinal fluid (SIF), reaching 70% within three hours. The release from SCF processed samples was slower than SE formulations, indicating superior surface coverage of MA on particles in comparison to the SE method. Most importantly, the protein conformation remained unchanged after the release from SCDDS as confirmed by circular dichroism. This study clearly demonstrates that the approach involving protein immobilisation on silica and scCO2 assisted melt-coating method can protect biomolecules from gastric environment and provide the required release of a biologic in intestine without any untoward effects on protein conformation during processing or after release.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document