scholarly journals “May the Force Be with You!” Force–Volume Mapping with Atomic Force Microscopy

ACS Omega ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olajumoke H. Olubowale ◽  
Shanta Biswas ◽  
Golam Azom ◽  
Benjamin L. Prather ◽  
Samuel D. Owoso ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Alexander Cartagena ◽  
Wen-Horng Wang ◽  
Robert L. Geahlen ◽  
Arvind Raman

Measurements of local nanomechanical properties of living cells recently have become extremely important for the cellular biology and biomechanics communities [1]. The measurement of progressive variations in viscoelastic properties of living cells in their native physiological liquid environments can provide significant insight to the mechanistic processes underpinning morphogenesis, mechano-transduction, motility, metastasis, aging, etc. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) based biomechanical assays have the unique advantage of resolving/mapping spatially the local nanomechanical properties over the cell surface. However current methods using standard force-volume, force displacement curves [2–3] are very low resolution and low speed making them completely incompatible for biomechanical assays of living cells.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Marshall ◽  
S Aguayo ◽  
M Kilian ◽  
FC Petersen ◽  
L Bozec ◽  
...  

AbstractIn common with many bacterial pathogens, Streptococcus pneumoniae has a polysaccharide capsule, which facilitates immune evasion and is a key virulence determinant. However, recent data has shown that the closely related Streptococcus mitis can also express polysaccharide capsules including those with an identical chemical structure to S. pneumoniae capsular serotypes. We have used atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques to investigate the biophysical properties of S. mitis and S. pneumoniae strains expressing the same capsular serotypes that might relate to their differences in virulence potential. When comparing S. mitis and S. pneumoniae strains with identical capsule serotypes S. mitis strains were more susceptible to neutrophil killing and imaging using electron microscopy and AFM demonstrated significant morphological differences. Force-volume mapping using AFM showed distinct force-curve profiles for the centre and edge areas of encapsulated S. pneumoniae and S. mitis strains. This “edge effect” was not observed in the unencapsulated streptococcal strains and in an unencapsulated Staphylococcus aureus strain, and therefore was a direct representation of the mechanical properties of the bacterial capsule. When two strains of S. mitis and S. pneumoniae expressed an identical capsular serotype, they presented also similar biomechanical characteristics. This would infer a potential relationship between capsule biochemistry and nanomechanics, independent of the bacterial strains. Overall, AFM was an effective tool to explore the biophysical properties of bacterial capsules of living bacteria by reproducibly quantifying the elastic and adhesive properties of bacterial cell surfaces. Using AFM to investigate capsule differences over a wider range of strains and capsular serotypes of streptococci and correlate the data with phenotypic differences will elucidate how the biophysical properties of the capsule can influence its biological role during infection.


Nanomaterials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanghong Zeng ◽  
Kai Dirscherl ◽  
Jørgen Garnæs

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has emerged as a popular tool for the mechanical mapping of soft nanomaterials due to its high spatial and force resolution. Its applications in rigid nanomaterials, however, have been underexplored. In this work, we studied elasticity mapping of common rigid materials by AFM, with a focus on factors that affect the accuracy of elasticity measurements. We demonstrated the advantages in speed and noise level by using high frequency mechanical mapping compared to the classical force volume mapping. We studied loading force dependency, and observed a consistent pattern on all materials, where measured elasticity increased with loading force before stabilizing. Tip radius was found to have a major impact on the accuracy of measured elasticity. The blunt tip with 200 nm radius measured elasticity with deviation from nominal values up to 13% in different materials, in contrast to 122% by the sharp tip with 40 nm radius. Plastic deformation is believed to be the major reason for this difference. Sharp tips, however, still hold advantages in resolution and imaging capability for nanomaterials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document