114 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is proved to improve survival in gastric cancer by meta-analyses. However, no evidence showed the best regimen. We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare triplets with doublets in the adjuvant setting. Methods: We collected data from January 2004 to December 2008 from patients performed radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Doublets were defined as 5-FU 750 mg/m2 (d1- 5) or capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 (d1-14) plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 (d1) or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (d1), while triplets had epirubicin 50 mg/m2 (d1) added. Chemotherapy was initiated within 6 weeks after surgery, repeated every three weeks and planned for 6 cycles. Patients were followed up in the outpatient clinic until death or April 30, 2010. Cox proportional-hazard model and chi-square test were used to test statistical difference. Results: A total of 316 patients (210 in doublets, 106 in triplets) had a median follow-up time of 47 months. 77 patients died at the end of follow-up (3-year survival of 67.4%).Two groups were well balanced except age (median age of 57 in doublets, 51 in triplets, p < 0.001). All the patients tolerated well, with few grade 3/4 side effects (21.9% in doublets, 30.2% in triplets, p = 0.107). Two groups had similar disease-free survival (median DFS, 16 months vs. 23 months, p = 0.656) and overall survival (3-year survival rate, 59.6% vs. 64.8%, p = 0.293). Subgroup analysis showed the same benefit on survival between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study suggested doublets and triplets had the same efficacy as the adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, doublets seem more cost-effective. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Meta-analyses of randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer
