scholarly journals Do existing theories explain seasonal to multi‐decadal changes in glacier basal sliding speed?

Author(s):  
Gimbert F ◽  
A. Gilbert ◽  
O. Gagliardini ◽  
C. Vincent ◽  
L. Moreau
Keyword(s):  
1974 ◽  
Vol 13 (69) ◽  
pp. 349-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Hodge

Detailed measurements of the positions of stakes along the center-line of the lower Nisqually Glacier were made over a period of two years. Variations in the basal sliding speed were calculated from the measured changes in surface speed, surface slope, and thickness, using the glacier flow model of Nye (1952) and allowing for the effect of the valley walls, longitudinal stress gradients, and uncertainties in the flow law of ice. The flow is predominantly by basal sliding and has a pronounced seasonal variation of approximately ±25%. Internal deformation contributes progressively less to the total motion with distance up-glacier. Neither the phase nor the magnitude of the seasonal velocity fluctuations can be accounted for by seasonal variations in the state of stress within the ice or at the bed, and the variations do not correlate directly with the melt-water discharge from the terminus. A seasonal wave in the ice flow travels down the glacier at a speed too high for propagation by internal deformation or the pressure melting/enhanced creep mechanism of basal sliding.The rate of sliding appears to be determined primarily by the amount of water in temporary storage in the glacier. The peak in sliding speed occurs, on the average, at the same time as the maximum liquid water storage of the South Cascade Glacier. The data support the idea that glaciers store water in the fall, winter and spring and then release it in the summer. This temporary storage may be greatest near the equilibrium line. The amount of stored water may increase over a period of years and be released catastrophically as a jökulhlaup. Any dependence of sliding on the basal shear stress is probably masked by the effect of variations in the hydrostatic pressure of water having access to the bed.


1974 ◽  
Vol 13 (69) ◽  
pp. 349-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Hodge

Detailed measurements of the positions of stakes along the center-line of the lower Nisqually Glacier were made over a period of two years. Variations in the basal sliding speed were calculated from the measured changes in surface speed, surface slope, and thickness, using the glacier flow model of Nye (1952) and allowing for the effect of the valley walls, longitudinal stress gradients, and uncertainties in the flow law of ice. The flow is predominantly by basal sliding and has a pronounced seasonal variation of approximately ±25%. Internal deformation contributes progressively less to the total motion with distance up-glacier. Neither the phase nor the magnitude of the seasonal velocity fluctuations can be accounted for by seasonal variations in the state of stress within the ice or at the bed, and the variations do not correlate directly with the melt-water discharge from the terminus. A seasonal wave in the ice flow travels down the glacier at a speed too high for propagation by internal deformation or the pressure melting/enhanced creep mechanism of basal sliding. The rate of sliding appears to be determined primarily by the amount of water in temporary storage in the glacier. The peak in sliding speed occurs, on the average, at the same time as the maximum liquid water storage of the South Cascade Glacier. The data support the idea that glaciers store water in the fall, winter and spring and then release it in the summer. This temporary storage may be greatest near the equilibrium line. The amount of stored water may increase over a period of years and be released catastrophically as a jökulhlaup. Any dependence of sliding on the basal shear stress is probably masked by the effect of variations in the hydrostatic pressure of water having access to the bed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1475-1496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugo Nanni ◽  
Florent Gimbert ◽  
Christian Vincent ◽  
Dominik Gräff ◽  
Fabian Walter ◽  
...  

Abstract. Water flowing below glaciers exerts a major control on glacier basal sliding. However, our knowledge of the physics of subglacial hydrology and its link with sliding is limited because of lacking observations. Here we use a 2-year-long dataset made of on-ice-measured seismic and in situ-measured glacier basal sliding speed on Glacier d'Argentière (French Alps) to investigate the physics of subglacial channels and its potential link with glacier basal sliding. Using dedicated theory and concomitant measurements of water discharge, we quantify temporal changes in channels' hydraulic radius and hydraulic pressure gradient. At seasonal timescales we find that hydraulic radius and hydraulic pressure gradient respectively exhibit a 2- and 6-fold increase from spring to summer, followed by comparable decrease towards autumn. At low discharge during the early and late melt season channels respond to changes in discharge mainly through changes in hydraulic radius, a regime that is consistent with predictions of channels' behaviour at equilibrium. In contrast, at high discharge and high short-term water-supply variability (summertime), channels undergo strong changes in hydraulic pressure gradient, a behaviour that is consistent with channels behaving out of equilibrium. This out-of-equilibrium regime is further supported by observations at the diurnal scale, which prove that channels pressurize in the morning and depressurize in the afternoon. During summer we also observe high and sustained basal sliding speed, which supports that the widespread inefficient drainage system (cavities) is likely pressurized concomitantly with the channel system. We propose that pressurized channels help sustain high pressure in cavities (and therefore high glacier sliding speed) through an efficient hydraulic connection between the two systems. The present findings provide an essential basis for testing the physics represented in subglacial hydrology and glacier sliding models.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Vincent ◽  
Andrea Walpersdorf ◽  
Adrien Gilbert ◽  
Olivier Gagliardini ◽  
Florent Gimbert ◽  
...  

<p>Understanding basal processes is a prerequisite for predicting the overall motion of glaciers and its response to climate change. Although a number of studies have shown that subglacial hydrology affects glacier’s basal sliding motion, the involved mechanisms remain poorly known. Several studies suggested that glacier velocity increases with englacial and subglacial water storage, but observational quantification of subglacial water storage and associated velocity changes are challenging to make due to uncertainties on velocity measurements and on vertical straining.</p><p>Here we tackle this observational challenge through analyzing numerous field measurements from the surface and from the subglacial observatory on the Argentière Glacier (French Alps). We analyze specifically the relationships between daily sliding velocities (measured continuously at the glacier base), surface horizontal and vertical velocities from DGPS observations and ice thickness changes over years 2018 and 2019. We find strong upward surface movements of about 0.5 m during the winter until the beginning of May that cannot be explained by longitudinal strain rate changes. We support that it is caused by water volume increase in subglacial cavities.</p><p>Further analyzing the relationships between cavity growth, sliding and surface velocities, we find that unlike in previous studies bed separation variations are not synchronous with sliding speed variations. Surface uplift starts in winter, which is long before the spring sliding acceleration, and surface drop occurs mid-summer, which is long before the end of summer sliding deceleration. These findings support that the link between subglacial water storage and sliding speed may not be as direct as previously thought.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 468-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dursun Özyürek ◽  
Ibrahim Ciftci ◽  
Tansel Tuncay

1976 ◽  
Vol 17 (75) ◽  
pp. 79-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Morris

AbstractThe results of regelation experiments, in which a single object is pulled through ice, cannot be applied directly to the problem of basal sliding in glaciers because the two systems have different geometries. When the force applied to a single object is small, impurities trapped in the regelation water-layer around the object inhibit the regelation process. At larger forces, above the Drake-Shreve transition point, impurities are shed in a trace behind the object. However, when ice moves over a series of obstacles a trace may exist above and below the transition point. The regelation velocity below the transition point is not reduced by the effect of trapped impurities. In an experiment in which brass cylingerrs of various cross-sections rotate in ice, the ratio between the expected regelation velocity, calculated using the basal-sliding theory of Nye, and the measured regelation velocity is 8±2, both above and below the transition point. The same ratio has been obtained by other workers with wires of similar thermal conductivity above the transition point. Measurements of température differences indicate that supercooling cannot be the main source of the unexpectedly low regelation velocities above the transition point.


Author(s):  
E. M. Evans ◽  
J. Whittle

This paper is intended to demonstrate that designers of wet clutches for power transmission can obtain the optimum friction characteristics for specific applications by considering the interaction between friction materials and lubricants. A friction clutch plate rig is described and the friction results obtained are presented. It is shown that a wide variation of coefficients of friction and frictional characteristics in wet friction clutches can be obtained by changing the oils and friction materials. In particular the coefficient of friction is dependent upon (1) the oil, (2) the materials of the sliding surfaces, (3) sliding speed, and (4) temperature. It is also shown that the coefficient of friction is affected by ( a) refining treatment given to the oil, ( b) different base oils, and ( c) additives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document