Review of A Practitioner's Guide to the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.

1984 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-262
Author(s):  
Samuel H. Osipow
1988 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 465-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Thorson ◽  
F. C. Powell

Three consecutive classes of freshman medical students completed the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule; results were compared to published norms for male and female college students. 171 male medical students scored significantly lower on the traits of Order, Exhibition, and Dominance and were higher on Affiliation, Succorance, Nurturance, and Heterosexuality. 51 female medical students scored significantly lower on the traits of Exhibition, Affiliation, and Abasement; they were higher on Achievement, Succorance, and Nurturance.


1966 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Massy ◽  
Thomas M. Lodahl ◽  
Ronald E. Frank

1967 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 817-824
Author(s):  
Bruce T. Leckart ◽  
Lawrence K. Waters ◽  
John Tarpinian

Ss classified as having a low or high need for affiliation by the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule viewed photographs rated as low affiliative, high affiliative, or neutral for as long as they wished. It was predicted that there would be a tendency for Ss to look longer at pictures congruent with their personality scores. No support was found; however, the results indicated that Ss with a high need for affiliation looked longer at all stimuli than Ss with a low need for affiliation. This finding was explained in terms of the high-affiliation Ss attempting to “please” E by looking longer at all stimuli. Evidence was also found suggesting that (a) the degree to which S believes E‘s instructions that the experiment is not a memory test and (b) Ss' self-ratings of nervousness are not related to looking time or the need for affiliation. Interest ratings and their relation to looking time may depend on Ss' personality.


1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-61
Author(s):  
Philip W. Soldan

Five teachers (judged to be effective teachers of behavior disordered children) were administered the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule and participated in an informal interview. A set of personality characteristics of effective teachers of the behavior disordered emerged. Such teachers tend to have a strong need for the following: dominance, intraception, affiliation, achievement, and succorance; and tend not to have a strong need for endurance, change, abasement, and aggression. Other important traits include a strong self-concept, a relationship orientation, a balance between introversion and extroversion, an ability to establish authority as a teacher (but not in an authoritarian manner), and patience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document