Effects of 48 hours of continuous work and sleep loss on sustained performance

1970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben B. Morgan ◽  
Bill R. Brown ◽  
Earl A. Alluisi
Author(s):  
Ben B. Morgan ◽  
Bill R. Brown ◽  
Earl A. Alluisi

The work efficiency of 10 subjects during a 48-hr period of continuous work and sleep loss was assessed using the synthetic-work technique. Performance during the period of stress was found to be significantly influenced by the circadian rhythm. Decrements first occurred after approximately 18 hr of continuous work, and performance decreased to an average of 82% of baseline during the early morning hours of the first night. Performance improved to about 90% of baseline during the daytime of the second day but decreased to approximately 67% during that night. All measures of performance recovered to baseline levels following a 24-hr period of rest and recovery.


1974 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-486
Author(s):  
Glynn D. Coates ◽  
Bill R. Brown ◽  
Ben B. Morgan

The synthetic-work approach was employed in an investigation of the effects of continuous work and sleep loss on sustained performance. Two crews of five subjects each worked continuously for 36 hr., slept 4 hr., and then returned to work 8 hr. per day. During the continuous-work period, one crew began work at 0400 hr. and the other at 1600 hr. Performance decrements were found to be significantly larger (33% as compared to 11%) and recovery to be less complete for the crew whose continuous work began during the low portion of the subjects' circadian rhythm (i.e., the crew beginning at 0400 hr.). Comparisons of these data with other continuous-work investigations (in which the continuous-work periods began at other points of the subjects' circadian rhythm) indicate that the circadian rhythm constitutes a primary determiner of man's ability to work continuously for extended periods of time and to recover from the effects of continuous work and sleep loss.


1979 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 547-548
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Miller ◽  
Glynn D. Coates ◽  
Raymond H. Kirby

The effects of extended periods of sleep loss and continuous work on complex human performance in male subjects have been fairly well documented (cf., Alluisi, Coates, & Morgan, 1977; Morgan, Brown, & Alluisi, 1974; Morgan, Brown, Coates, & Alluisi, 1974). However, similar data are unavailable for the female worker. Further, the results of these previous studies have indicated that, for male subjects, the underlying circadian rhythm interacts with the effects of sleep loss and continuous work (Alluisi, et al., 1977). If it can be assumed that the interactive effects of the circadian rhythm are due in part to an underlying physiological cycle, it is reasonable to hypothesize that similar interactive effects would be observed in systematic investigations of the effects of 48 hours of sleep loss and continuous work at various points of the menstrual cycle in females. The purposes of the present series of investigations were, therefore, twofold: (1) To determine the effects of 48 hours of continuous work and sleep loss on complex human performance in female subjects with a goal of providing direct comparisons of male and female performances under identical conditions, and (2) To determine the effects of the menstrual cycle, if any, as it interacts with the effects of sleep loss and continuous work.


1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Mullaney ◽  
Daniel F. Kripke ◽  
Paul Fleck

1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey Babkoff ◽  
Gerald P. Krueger

1997 ◽  
Vol 1997 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-99
Author(s):  
Vincent Cantwell

ABSTRACT Although human performance varies greatly between and within individuals, it can generally be predicted from a number of physiological and psychophysiological factors that are common to all humankind, regardless of the operational environment. These include the effects that circadian influences, disrupted sleep, sleep loss, physical exertion, and other factors, including caffeine, alcohol, and over-the-counter medications, have on performance, cognition, and response time, and therefore on the safety of any planned or emergency response operation. Particularly when operational demands require sustained performance in a hazardous time- and cost-sensitive environment, such as during spill response operations, these physiological considerations must be factored into the planning and execution of response operations if maximal safety, effectiveness, and cost efficiency are to be preserved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document