Gender differences and cognitive abilities in the transfer of training of basic flying skills

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. McCloy ◽  
John F. Swiney
1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 602-604
Author(s):  
Thomas M. McCloy ◽  
John F. Swiney

Eighteen Air Force Academy cadets, ten males and eight females, participated in an experiment designed to investigate gender differences in the retention of basic flying skills, and the transfer of training between several basic instrument maneuvers. Additionally, the utility of several cognitive factors in predicting flying performance was investigated. The results indicated that males and females maintain basic instrument flying skills approximately equally well over an intervening period as long as one year. Additionally, gender differences in transfer of training may result from different abilities required by the specific maneuvers as opposed to failure to transfer previously learned skills. Finally, certain cognitive measures exhibit definite utility in predicting flying performance.


1987 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A. Vogel ◽  
Patricia C. Walsh

2000 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle J. Hindmarsh ◽  
Michael J. O’Callaghan ◽  
Heather A. Mohay ◽  
Yvonne M. Rogers

1981 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 654-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Mccloy ◽  
Jefferson M. Koonce

Twenty-four Air Force Academy cadets participated in an experiment designed to investigate gender differences in the transfer of training between various basic instrument maneuvers. Half the subjects, six males and six females, first flew a climb, cruise, descend profile and then flew a transfer task profile of right turn, cruise, left turn. The remaining subjects, six males and six females, flew the profiles in the reverse order. The results indicate that gender differences in performance of basic flying skills are probably due to previous differential exposure to similar type tasks. Males and females transferred previous training equally well to more difficult basic instrument maneuvers.


Author(s):  
Yu-Wei Luke Chu ◽  
Susan J. Linz

A growing literature suggests that noncognitive abilities are important determinants of earnings. But empirical research on nonwage labor market outcomes is still limited due to data availability. In this paper, we collect employer-employee linked data from six former socialist countries and estimate three noncognitive abilities: adherence to work ethic, the preference for challenge versus affiliation, and locus of control, and their relationship with workers’ supervisory status and promotions. We find that these noncognitive abilities are strong predictors of the likelihood of being a supervisor and being promoted as well as the number of supervisees and promotions. We also study the role of noncognitive abilities in the gender gap in these labor market outcomes. Based on a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition, gender differences in these noncognitive abilities can explain a modest proportion of the gender gap in supervisory status and promotions.


2020 ◽  
pp. 174702182096070
Author(s):  
Kelvin FH Lui ◽  
Ken HM Yip ◽  
Alan C-N Wong

There is a widespread stereotype that women are better at multitasking. Previous studies examining gender difference in multitasking used either a concurrent or sequential multitasking paradigm and offered mixed results. This study examined a possibility that men were better at concurrent multitasking while women were better at task switching. In addition, men and women were also compared in terms of multitasking experience, measured by a computer monitoring software, a self-reported Media Use Questionnaire, a laboratory task-switching paradigm, and a self-reported Multitasking Prevalence Inventory. Results showed a smaller concurrent multitasking (dual-task) cost for men than women and no gender difference in sequential multitasking (task-switching) cost. Men had more experience in multitasking involving video games while women were more experienced in multitasking involving music, instant messaging, and web surfing. The gender difference in dual-task performance, however, was not mediated by the gender differences in multitasking experience but completely explained by difference in the processing speed. The findings suggest that men have an advantage in concurrent multitasking, which may be a result of the individual differences in cognitive abilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document