The Basic Empathy Scale: Factor structure and validity in a sample of inpatient adolescents.

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1208-1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica McLaren ◽  
Salome Vanwoerden ◽  
Carla Sharp
2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Reniers ◽  
R. Corcoran ◽  
R. Drake ◽  
N. Shryane ◽  
B. Völlm

Aims/objectives:A lack of empathy is associated with callous-unemotional behaviour, violence, aggression, criminality, and problems in social interaction. Empathy is, though, inconsistently defined and inadequately measured. We therefore set out to produce a new and rigorously developed empathy questionnaire that would have clinical and public-health relevance.Methods:Sixty-five questions, themed around cognitive empathy (the ability to construct a working model of the emotional states of others) and affective empathy (the ability to be sensitive to and vicariously experience the feelings of others), were administered to two independent samples of healthy volunteers (N1=640, N2=383), which were used to explore and validate the factor structure.Results:Principal components analysis revealed five factors from thirty-seven items. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed this structure. The hypothesised two-factor structure (cognitive and affective empathy) was tested by adding two second order factors, indicated by the five first-order factors, and provided the best and most parsimonious fit to the data (CFI=0.961, RMSEA=0.048). Cognitive Empathy encompassed Perspective Taking and Online Simulation; Affective Empathy encompassed Emotional Responsivity, Peripheral Responsivity and Emotional Contagion. Females scored significantly higher than males on Affective Empathy but not on Cognitive Empathy. The factors correlated significantly with measures of empathic anger, impulsivity, aggression, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and empathy as measured by the Basic Empathy Scale.Conclusions:The QCAE measures the distinct and specific components that make up cognitive and affective empathy. The factor structure was confirmed in independent samples and represents a valid tool for assessing cognitive and affective empathy and its subcomponents.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 679-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Carré ◽  
Nicolas Stefaniak ◽  
Fanny D'Ambrosio ◽  
Leïla Bensalah ◽  
Chrystel Besche-Richard

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Patricia Sánchez Miranda ◽  
Arturo De La Garza González ◽  
Ernesto Octavio López Ramírez ◽  
Guadalupe Elizabeth Morales Martínez

The goal of the study was to measure and compare environmental preference on 59 biology students and 75 psychology students from a Mexican public university. Participants were shown 60 images of natural and urban environments, they were required to indicate the degree of relationship experienced with that environment, using a 7-point Likert scale. The results showed an internal consistency of 0.94 and a single-factor structure for the scale factor of nature dimension and three others related to an urban dimension (Entertainment, Pollution and Football Soccer). Moreover, a significant main difference on rating performance was obtained between the Biology and Psychology samples.


2005 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Bedford ◽  
J. D. Henry ◽  
J. R. Crawford

The two-component structure of anxiety and depression items of the short form Personal Disturbance Scale, reported in an earlier clinical study of 480 adult psychiatric patients, was substantially replicated in a large nonclinical sample of 758 adults.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noelia Sánchez-Pérez ◽  
Luis J. Fuentes ◽  
Darrick Jolliffe ◽  
Carmen González-Salinas

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrick Jolliffe ◽  
David P. Farrington

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document