Borderline Personality Questionnaire

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir M. Poreh ◽  
David Rawlings ◽  
Gordon Claridge ◽  
Justin L. Freeman ◽  
Catherine Faulkner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Personality Questionnaire

scholarly journals Traduction et validation du questionnaire de dépistage Borderline Personality Questionnaire

2020 ◽  
pp. 070674372094407
Author(s):  
Nadine Larivière ◽  
Frédéric Pérusse ◽  
Pierre David
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Troubles De La Personnalité ◽  
Pratique Clinique

Objectif: Disposer d’outils de dépistage valides pour évaluer le trouble de la personnalité limite est essentiel en pratique clinique et en recherche. Parmi les outils existants, le questionnaire sur la personnalité limite (BPQ) présente plusieurs qualités. Cependant, il n’existe pas de version française et il n’a pas été validé avec des adultes dans un échantillon clinique. Les objectifs de cette étude étaient : 1) traduire le BPQ en français; 2) mesurer la validité convergente, prédictive et discriminante, la cohérence interne et la fidélité test-retest. Méthode: Les recommandations de Streiner, Norman et Cairney (2014) sur la traduction d’évaluations ont été suivies. Quarante adultes référés à un programme spécialisé en troubles de la personnalité ont participé à l’étude. Pour évaluer la validité du BPQ français, le questionnaire SCID-II (entrevue et auto-évaluation) fut administré et le diagnostic psychiatrique fut établi par un psychiatre à l’insu. Résultats: Aucune modification majeure n’a été apportée au BPQ français. Les analyses ont montré une cohérence interne élevée (α = 0,84), une bonne fidélité test-retest (r = 0,77), une discrimination significative avec le trouble de la personnalité schizotypique (r = -0,31; p < 0,05), une convergence significative avec le SCID-II (r = 0,72) et une validité prédictive significative du diagnostic psychiatrique (p < 0,01). Conclusions: La version française du BPQ présente des qualités psychométriques prometteuses à un usage auprès des personnes ayant un trouble de la personnalité limite.

Relationship between Schizotypal and Borderline Traits in College Students

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 306-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero ◽  
Serafín Lemos-Giráldez ◽  
Mercedes Paino ◽  
Susana Sierra-Baigrie ◽  
José Muñiz
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Schizotypal Personality ◽  
Lack Of Control ◽  
Borderline Personality Traits ◽  
Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire ◽  
The Relationship

The main objective of the present investigation was to analyze the relationship between self-reported schizotypal and borderline personality traits in a sample of 759 college students (M = 19.63 years; SD = 2.03). For this purpose, the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief (SPQB; Raine and Benishay, 1995) and Borderline Personality Questionnaire (BPQ; Poreh et al., 2006) were administered. The results showed that schizotypal and borderline features are partially related at subclinical level. The exploratory factor analysis conducted on the subscales revealed a three-factor solution comprised of the following factors: Identity/Interpersonal, Lack of Control and Schizotypal. The canonical correlation analysis showed that schizotypal features and borderline personality traits shared 34.8 % of the variance. The data highlight the overlap between schizotypal and borderline personality traits in nonclinical young adults. Future studies should continue to examine the relationship and the degree of overlap between these traits in community samples.

scholarly journals The CDA-BPD: retrofitting a traditional borderline personality questionnaire under the cognitive diagnosis model framework

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siwei Peng ◽  
Daxun Wang ◽  
Xuliang Gao ◽  
Yan Cai ◽  
Dongbo Tu
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Cognitive Diagnosis ◽  
General Level ◽  
Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Model Framework ◽  
Level Information ◽  
Diagnosis Model ◽  
Cognitive Diagnosis Model

Abstract To obtain rich information about the cognitive diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD), this study attempted to retrofit a traditional borderline personality questionnaire so that the improved assessment (called CDA-BPD) could provide more diagnostic information. The retrofitting processes included the following steps: (1) applied an cognitive diagnosis model to analyze the psychometric characteristics of the traditional questionnaire; (2) under the guidance of cognitive diagnosis assessment (CDA), high-quality items were chosen to develop the CDA-BPD and tested on 1,097 subjects; (3) the quality of the CDA-BPD was evaluated; (4) the structure of the CDA-BPD was analyzed. Results indicated that: (1) the CDA-BPD had acceptable reliability and validity; (2) the CDA-BPD had sensitivity of 0.985 and specificity of 0.853 with area under curve (AUC) = 0.956; (3) the two structural factors of the traditional questionnaire were confirmed in the CDA-BPD; χ2 was 83.01 with df = 26, p < .0001, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.97, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.045. It was concluded that the practice of retrofitting a traditional borderline personality assessment for cognitive diagnostic purpose was feasible. Most importantly, under the cognitive diagnosis model framework, CDA-BPD could simultaneously provide general-level information and the detailed symptom criteria-level information about the posterior probability of satisfying each symptom criterion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) for each individual, which gave further insight into tailoring individual-specific treatments for borderline personality disorder.

Does temperamental instability support a continuity between bipolar II disorder and major depressive disorder?

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 274-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Benazzi
Keyword(s):  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Mood Disorders ◽  
Kernel Density ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Kernel Density Estimate ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Entire Sample ◽  
Bipolar Ii

AbstractBackgroundThe current categorical split of mood disorders in bipolar disorders and depressive disorders has recently been questioned. Two highly unstable personality features, i.e. the cyclothymic temperament (CT) and borderline personality disorder (BPD), have been found to be more common in bipolar II (BP-II) disorder than in major depressive disorder (MDD). According to Kraepelin, temperamental instability was the ‘foundation’ of his unitary view of mood disorders.Study aimThe aim was to assess the distributions of the number of CT and borderline personality items between BP-II and MDD. Finding no bi-modal distribution (a ‘zone of rarity’) of these items would support a continuity between the two disorders.MethodsStudy setting: an outpatient psychiatry private practice. Interviewer: A senior clinical and mood disorder research psychiatrist. Patient population: A consecutive sample of 138 BP-II and 71 MDD remitted outpatients. Assessment instruments: The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Clinician Version (SCID-CV), the SCID-II Personality Questionnaire for self-assessing borderline personality traits (BPT) by patients, the TEMPS-A for self-assessing CT by patients. Interview methods: Patients were interviewed with the SCID-CV to diagnose BP-II and MDD, and then patients self-assessed the questions of the Personality Questionnaire relative to borderline personality, and the questions of the TEMPS-A relative to CT. As clinically significant distress or impairment of functioning is not assessed by the SCID-II Personality Questionnaire, a diagnosis of BPD could not be made, but BPT could be assessed (i.e. all BPD items but not the impairment criterion). The distribution of the number of CT and BPT items was studied by Kernel density estimate.ResultsCT and BPT items were significantly more common in BP-II versus MDD. The Kernel density estimate distributions of the number of CT and BPT items in the entire sample had a normal-like shape (i.e. no bi-modality).ConclusionsThe expected finding, on the basis of previous studies and of the present sample features, was a clustering of CT and BPT items on the BP-II side of the curves. Instead, no bi-modality was present in the distributions of the number of CT and BPT items in the entire sample, showing a normal-like shape. By using the bi-modality approach, a continuity between BP-II and MDD seems supported, questioning the current categorical splitting of BP-II and MDD based on classic diagnostic validators.

Emotion-Oriented Coping Style Predicts Self-Harm in Response to Acute Psychiatric Hospitalization

Crisis ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Jacqueline M. Frei ◽  
Vladimir Sazhin ◽  
Melissa Fick ◽  
Keong Yap
Keyword(s):  
Borderline Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Psychiatric Hospitalization ◽  
Coping Styles ◽  
Psychiatric Inpatients ◽  
Borderline Personality ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Coping Behaviors ◽  
Self Harm

Abstract. Psychiatric hospitalization can cause significant distress for patients. Research has shown that to cope with the stress, patients sometimes resort to self-harm. Given the paucity of research on self-harm among psychiatric inpatients, a better understanding of transdiagnostic processes as predictors of self-harm during psychiatric hospitalization is needed. The current study examined whether coping styles predicted self-harm after controlling for commonly associated factors, such as age, gender, and borderline personality disorder. Participants were 72 patients (mean age = 39.32 years, SD = 12.29, 64% male) admitted for inpatient treatment at a public psychiatric hospital in Sydney, Australia. Participants completed self-report measures of coping styles and ward-specific coping behaviors, including self-harm, in relation to coping with the stress of acute hospitalization. Results showed that younger age, diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, and higher emotion-oriented coping were associated with self-harm. After controlling for age and borderline personality disorder, higher levels of emotion-oriented coping were found to be a significant predictor of self-harm. Findings were partially consistent with hypotheses; emotion-oriented but not avoidance-oriented coping significantly predicted self-harm. This finding may help to identify and provide psychiatric inpatients who are at risk of self-harm with appropriate therapeutic interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document