scholarly journals Erythropoietin monotherapy for neuroprotection after neonatal encephalopathy in low-to-middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Phoebe Ivain ◽  
Paolo Montaldo ◽  
Aamir Khan ◽  
Ramyia Elagovan ◽  
Constance Burgod ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective We examined whether erythropoietin monotherapy improves neurodevelopmental outcomes in near-term and term infants with neonatal encephalopathy (NE) in low-middle income countries (LMICs). Methods We searched Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies that used erythropoietin (1500–12,500 units/kg/dose) or a derivative to treat NE. Results Five studies, with a total of 348 infants in LMICs, were retrieved. However, only three of the five studies met the primary outcome of death or neuro-disability at 18 months of age or later. Erythropoietin reduced the risk of death (during the neonatal period and at follow-up) or neuro-disability at 18 months or later (p < 0.05). Death or neuro-disability occurred in 27.6% of the erythropoietin group and 49.7% of the comparison group (risk ratio 0.56 (95% CI: 0.42–0.75)). Conclusion The pooled data suggest that erythropoietin monotherapy may improve outcomes after NE in LMICs where therapeutic hypothermia is not available.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Ackah ◽  
Louise Ameyaw ◽  
Kwadwo Owusu Akuffo ◽  
Cynthia Osei Yeboah ◽  
Nana Esi Wood ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Seroprevalence of SARS Cov-2 provides a good indication of the extent of exposure and spread in the population, as well as those likely to benefit from a vaccine candidate. To date, there is no published or ongoing systematic review on the seroprevalence of COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). This systematic review and meta-analysis will estimate SARS Cov-2 seroprevalence and the risk factors for SARS Cov-2 infection in LMICs.Methods We will search PubMed, EMBASE, WHO COVID-19 Global research database, Google Scholar, the African Journals Online, LILAC, HINARI, medRxiv, bioRxiv and Cochrane Library for potentially useful studies on seroprevalence of COVID-19 in LMICs from December 2019 to December 2020 without language restriction. Two authors will independently screen all the articles, select studies based on pre-specified eligibility criteria and extract data using a pre-tested data extraction form. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion between the authors. The pooled seroprevalence of SARS CoV-2 for people from LMICs will be calculated. Random effects model will be used in case of substantial heterogeneity in the included studies, otherwise fixed-effect model will be used. A planned subgroup, sensitivity and meta-regression analyses will be performed. For comparative studies, the analyses will be performed using Review Manager v 5.4; otherwise, STATA 16 will be used. All effect estimates will be presented with their confidence intervals.Discussion The study will explore and systematically review empirical evidence on SARS Cov-2 seroprevalence in LMICs, and to assess the risk factors for SARS Cov-2 infection in Low Middle Income Countries in the context of rolling out vaccines in these countries. Finally, explore risk classifications to help with the rolling out of vaccines in LMICs.Systematic review registration: The protocol for this review has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD422020221548).


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0244709
Author(s):  
Lucy Plumb ◽  
Emily J. Boother ◽  
Fergus J. Caskey ◽  
Manish D. Sinha ◽  
Yoav Ben-Shlomo

Background When detected early, inexpensive measures can slow chronic kidney disease progression to kidney failure which, for children, confers significant morbidity and impacts growth and development. Our objective was to determine the incidence of late presentation of childhood chronic kidney disease and its associated risk factors. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and CINAHL, grey literature and registry websites for observational data describing children <21 years presenting to nephrology services, with reference to late presentation (or synonyms thereof). Independent second review of eligibility, data extraction, and risk of bias was undertaken. Meta-analysis was used to generate pooled proportions for late presentation by definition and investigate risk factors. Meta-regression was undertaken to explore heterogeneity. Results Forty-five sources containing data from 30 countries were included, comprising 19,339 children. Most studies (37, n = 15,772) described children first presenting in kidney failure as a proportion of the chronic kidney disease population (mean proportion 0.43, 95% CI 0.34–0.54). Using this definition, the median incidence was 2.1 (IQR 0.9–3.9) per million age-related population. Risk associations included non-congenital disease and older age. Studies of hospitalised patients, or from low- or middle-income countries, that had older study populations than high-income countries, had higher proportions of late presentation. Conclusions Late presentation is a global problem among children with chronic kidney disease, with higher proportions seen in studies of hospitalised children or from low/middle-income countries. Children presenting late are older and more likely to have non-congenital kidney disease than timely presenting children. A consensus definition is important to further our understanding and local populations should identify modifiable barriers beyond age and disease to improve access to care.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumera Aziz Ali ◽  
Shama Razzaq ◽  
Savera Aziz ◽  
Ahreen Allana ◽  
Arzina Aziz Ali ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundIron deficiency anemia is a common public health problem problem among women of reproductive age (WRA) as it is can lead to unfavorable maternal and birth outcomes. Although studies are undertaken to assess the efficacy of iron, there are some gaps and limitations in the existing studies that need to be addressed. To address the gaps, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the existing evidence regarding the role of iron in decreasing anemia among WRA in low-middle-income countries.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and Science Direct were systematically searched using a comprehensive search strategy for randomized controlled trials published between 2000 to 2020. Mean change in hemoglobin level was assessed as a primary outcome. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled effect of all studies using standardized mean differences and their respective 95% CI. We assessed heterogeneity and publication bias using I2 statistics and Egger’s test respectively. This review was conducted with the help of updated guidelines based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysisResultsGenerally, the results demonstrated a favorable effect of iron therapy in improving hemoglobin levels with variation across studies. An overall pooled effect estimate for the role of iron therapy in decreasing the burden of anemia among WRA was -0.51 (95% CI: -1.03 to 0.01) (p = 0.04). Likewise, iron therapy improved ferritin levels and decreased the prevalence of anemia. The heterogeneity across included studies was found to be statistically significant as indicated by the parameters of heterogeneity (Q = 1191.60, I2 = 98.24%, p = 0.000). ConclusionIron therapy in any form may reduce the burden of anemia and improve the hemoglobin and ferritin levels, indicating improvement in iron-deficiency anemia. However, more evidence is needed to assess the morbidity associated with iron consumption such as side effects, work performance, economic outcomes, mental health, and compliance to the intervention with a special focus on married but non-pregnant women planning a pregnancy in near future. A systematic review and Meta-analysis registration: Registered with PROSPERO and ID is CRD42020185033


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e042951
Author(s):  
Purity Njagi ◽  
Wim Groot ◽  
Jelena Arsenijevic ◽  
Silke Dyer ◽  
Gitau Mburu ◽  
...  

IntroductionInfertility, a condition of the reproductive system, affects millions of individuals and couples worldwide. Despite infertility treatment’s existence, it is largely unavailable and inaccessible in low/middle-income countries (LMICs) due to the prohibitive costs compounded by an absence of financing. Previous systematic reviews have shown that there is scanty information in LMICs on out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for infertility treatment. This protocol outlines the methodological approach and analytical process to appraise the extent of economic burden due to payments for infertility care services in LMICs.Method and analysisUsing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, we will primarily search for articles indexed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EconLit and PsycINFO databases. Grey literature from relevant organisations’ virtual libraries shall also be searched. Backward and forward searches on the articles selected will also be done. Quantitative studies on infertility treatment costs from LMICs across the world regions within the last 20 years will be considered. The primary outcome of interest shall include OOP payments, catastrophic health expenditure and direct costs for infertility services. Conversely, informal payments and indirect costs related to infertility treatments shall be considered as secondary outcomes. Integrated quality Criteria for Review Of Multiple Study designs will be used to assess the quality of the studies included in the review. Meta-analysis shall be considered if sufficient studies identified are homogenous in characteristics. Also, the review shall analyse the average cost of infertility treatment against the respective countries’ economic indicators like gross domestic product per capita if data permit.Ethics and disseminationResearch and ethics approval will not be required given this will be a review of published articles on the subject. The findings shall be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation to the WHO and its partners.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020199312.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne Assies ◽  
Ilse Snik ◽  
Yamikani Chimalizeni ◽  
Mercy Kumwenda ◽  
Josephine Langton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document