scholarly journals Corticosteroids do not influence the efficacy and kinetics of CAR-T cells for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangyou Liu ◽  
Biping Deng ◽  
Zhichao Yin ◽  
Jing Pan ◽  
Yuehui Lin ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 228-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangyou Liu ◽  
Biping Deng ◽  
Jing PAN ◽  
Zhichao Yin ◽  
Yuehui Lin ◽  
...  

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most prominent and potentially life-threatening toxicity caused by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, therefore, effectively controlling severe CRS is critical to ensure patient safety. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, has been widely used to treat CRS, whereas it is not clear if corticosteroids could be as another optimal choice for managing CRS. We applied corticosteroids instead of tocilizumab as the first-line agent to control CRS in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia during CAR-T therapy. The impacts of steroids on treatment efficiency and kinetics of CAR-T cells were assessed by comparing two groups of patients who did (42 cases) or did not (26 cases) receive steroids. Patients followed up less than one month (went to other hospitals for transplantation or died within one month) were excluded. Treatment effects were evaluated on day 30 after T-cell infusion and then monthly in follow-up patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was detected by multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM) and quantitative PCR for fusion genes. The dynamic monitoring of CAR-T cells was performed through flow cytometric quantitation of FITC+CD3+ T cells. B-cell aplasia (BCA) was assayed by FCM. Dexamethasone or methylprednisolone or both (alternately) were administrated. Dexamethasone was used in most cases especially for patients with neurologic symptoms; methylprednisolone was preferred for patients with pulmonary or liver dysfunction, and patients accepting high dose steroids. Steroids started with low dose and could be increased if symptoms were not resolved, for severe CRS, steroids would be escalated up to dexamethasone 20mg/m2/d or more higher up to methylprednisolone 10mg/kg/d. Once CRS was improved, steroids were rapidly reduced and stopped. A total of 68 patients (28 adults and 40 children younger than 18 years) were included, 22 (32.4%) presented with extramedullary diseases (EMD), bone marrow blasts in patients without EMD varied between 5%-96.5%, 31 (45.6%) patients had an allogeneic transplantation, 54 (79.4%) cases received CD19-specific and 14 (20.6%) received CD22-specific CAR-T therapy. Forty-two (61.8%) cases, including all (10) of grade III CRS, 68.2% (30/44) of grade II CRS and 2 patients with no CRS but with GVHD (1 case) or neurotoxicity (1 case), were administered steroids, among them, 23/42 (54.8%) received high dose steroids (>10mg/m2/d dexamethasone or equivalent), the duration of steroid use was 1-16 days (78.6% <= 7 days); whereas 26 (38.2%) patients were not given any steroids but the supportive care. We found that there was no difference either in complete remission (CR) rate (95.2% vs 92.3%, p=.344) or in MRD negative CR rate (80.0% vs 79.2%, p=.249) between steroid and non-steroid group, verified that corticosteroids even high dose steroids did not influence the treatment response. Furthermore, we investigated the dynamics of CAR-T cells. Firstly, the expansion of CAR-T cells in peripheral blood (PB) was evaluated, the average CAR-T cell counts in steroid group were significantly higher than those in non-steroid group on D11 (p=.0302), D15 (p=.0053), D20 (p=.0045) and D30 (p=.0028), except for D7 when CAR-T cells began to expand (p=.9815), this demonstrated that steroids did not suppress the proliferation of CAR-T cells in PB. Secondly, the percentages of patients with detectable CAR-T cells in bone marrow (BM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were compared between steroid and non-steroid group, there were no differences both in BM (85.2% vs 78.6%, p=.923) and in CSF (68.6% vs 57.9%, p=.433), which implied steroids did not influence the trafficking of T-cells to BM and CSF. Thirdly, we monitored B-cell aplasia (BCA) in part of patients followed-up more than 2 months without further treatments, the percentages of patients with BCA in steroid group had no significant differences compared to non-steroid group at 2-month (p=.086) and 3-month (p=.146). Later, although limited cases left, in the steroid group, 100% of patients (4-month, 7/7; 5-month, 7/7; 6-month, 5/5) still maintained BCA and CR, indicating that corticosteroids did not impact the duration of functional CAR-T cells. In conclusion, corticosteroids do not compromise the treatment efficacy and kinetics of CAR-T cells, could be as a feasible and effective approach to manage CAR-T associated CRS. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 272-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyu Zhao ◽  
Junfang Yang ◽  
Xian Zhang ◽  
Xin-An Lu ◽  
Min Xiong ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen E. Annesley ◽  
Corinne Summers ◽  
Francesco Ceppi ◽  
Rebecca A. Gardner

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hildegard T. Greinix

SummaryChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are genetically engineered cells containing fusion proteins combining an extracellular epitope-specific binding domain, a transmembrane and signaling domains of the T cell receptor. The CD19-CAR T cell product tisagenlecleucel has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for therapy of children and young adults under 25 years with relapsed/refractory B‑cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) due to a high overall response rate of 81% at 3 months after therapy. The rates of event-free and overall survival were 50 and 76% at 12 months. Despite the high initial response rate with CD19-CAR‑T cells in B‑ALL, relapses occur in a significant fraction of patients. Current strategies to improve CAR‑T cell efficacy focus on improved persistence of CAR‑T cells in vivo, use of multispecific CARs to overcome immune escape and new CAR designs. The approved CAR‑T cell products are from autologous T cells generated on a custom-made basis with an inherent risk of production failure. For large scale clinical applications, universal CAR‑T cells serving as “off-the-shelf” agents would be of advantage. During recent years CAR‑T cells have been frequently used for bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with relapsed/refractory B‑ALL since we currently are not able to distinguish those CAR‑T cell induced CRs that will persist without further therapy from those that are likely to be short-lived. CAR‑T cells are clearly of benefit for treatment following relapse after allogeneic HSCT. Future improvements in CAR‑T cell constructs may allow longer term remissions without additional HSCT.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1755-1755
Author(s):  
Sining Liu ◽  
Xinyue Zhang ◽  
Haiping Dai ◽  
Qingya Cui ◽  
Wei Cui ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells therapy has shown great success in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). To reduce the possibility of relapse due to CD19 antigen loss, sequential CD19/CD22 and tandem CD19/CD22 dual targets CAR-T cells have been developed. However, the optimal combination strategy of target antigens for CAR-T cells is still uncertain. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of single CD19, tandem CD19/CD22 and sequential CD19/CD22 CAR-T cells therapies in relapsed/refractory(R/R) B-ALL patients. Methods: Between March 2016 and August 2020, a total of 200 patients with R/R B-ALL successfully received 230 CAR-T treatments (30 patients received the second CAR-T therapy and 8 patients received the third CAR-T therapy) were screened in this study. Among them, 168 patients received single CD19 CAR-T therapy, 49 patients received tandem CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy, and 13 patients received sequential CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy. ALL patients enrolled in the CD19 CAR-T clinical trials (NCT03919240) or CD19/CD22 CAR-T clinical trials (NCT03614858). Results: The baseline characteristics of patients were similar among the three groups. The complete remission (CR) rates were 82.7% (139/168) in patients who received CD19 CAR-T therapy, 95.9% (47/49) in patients who received tandem CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy, and 69.2% (9/13) in patients who received sequential CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy (P=0.012). Tandem CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy remained one of the significant favorable factors in multivariate logistic regression analysis of CR rate in all patients (hazard ratio, 0.081; 95% CI, 0.010-0.671). Furthermore, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR rates were 66.7%, 81.6% and 61.5%, respectively (P=0.092). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events among the three groups. Severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS, Grade ≥ 3) occurred in 25.0% of patients in CD19 group, 18.4% of patients in tandem CD19/CD22 group, and 23.1% in sequential CD19/CD22 group (P=0.641). There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) among three groups (6-month OS: 83.1%, 90.0% and 88.9%, respectively, P=0.1620; 6-month LFS: 76.2%, 76.2% and 88.9%, respectively, P=0.8179). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that a better LFS related to less frequencies of relapse, lower tumor burden, MRD-negative CR and bridging allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Conclusions: Tandem CD19/CD22 dual targets CAR-T cells therapy obtains superior CR rate than single CD19 and sequential CD19/CD22 CAR-T cells therapy. This provides an effective treatment option for R/R B-ALL patients with chemotherapy resistance. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document