scholarly journals Functional annotation of breast cancer risk loci: current progress and future directions

Author(s):  
Shirleny Romualdo Cardoso ◽  
Andrea Gillespie ◽  
Syed Haider ◽  
Olivia Fletcher

AbstractGenome-wide association studies coupled with large-scale replication and fine-scale mapping studies have identified more than 150 genomic regions that are associated with breast cancer risk. Here, we review efforts to translate these findings into a greater understanding of disease mechanism. Our review comes in the context of a recently published fine-scale mapping analysis of these regions, which reported 352 independent signals and a total of 13,367 credible causal variants. The vast majority of credible causal variants map to noncoding DNA, implicating regulation of gene expression as the mechanism by which functional variants influence risk. Accordingly, we review methods for defining candidate-regulatory sequences, methods for identifying putative target genes and methods for linking candidate-regulatory sequences to putative target genes. We provide a summary of available data resources and identify gaps in these resources. We conclude that while much work has been done, there is still much to do. There are, however, grounds for optimism; combining statistical data from fine-scale mapping with functional data that are more representative of the normal “at risk” breast, generated using new technologies, should lead to a greater understanding of the mechanisms that influence an individual woman’s risk of breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 1046-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin B. Meyer ◽  
Martin O’Reilly ◽  
Kyriaki Michailidou ◽  
Saskia Carlebur ◽  
Stacey L. Edwards ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1680-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingyi Guo ◽  
Jirong Long ◽  
Chenjie Zeng ◽  
Kyriaki Michailidou ◽  
Maya Ghoussaini ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Baxter ◽  
Olivia C. Leavy ◽  
Nicola H. Dryden ◽  
Sarah Maguire ◽  
Nichola Johnson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Fachal ◽  
Hugues Aschard ◽  
Jonathan Beesley ◽  
Daniel R. Barnes ◽  
Jamie Allen ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTGenome-wide association studies have identified breast cancer risk variants in over 150 genomic regions, but the mechanisms underlying risk remain largely unknown. These regions were explored by combining association analysis with in silico genomic feature annotations. We defined 205 independent risk-associated signals with the set of credible causal variants (CCVs) in each one. In parallel, we used a Bayesian approach (PAINTOR) that combines genetic association, linkage disequilibrium, and enriched genomic features to determine variants with high posterior probabilities (HPPs) of being causal. Potentially causal variants were significantly over-represented in active gene regulatory regions and transcription factor binding sites. We applied our INQUSIT pipeline for prioritizing genes as targets of potentially causal variants, using gene expression (eQTL), chromatin interaction and functional annotations. Known cancer drivers, transcription factors and genes in the developmental, apoptosis, immune system and DNA integrity checkpoint gene ontology pathways, were over-represented among the 178 highest confidence target genes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1692-1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam S. Udler ◽  
Kerstin B. Meyer ◽  
Karen A. Pooley ◽  
Eric Karlins ◽  
Jeffery P. Struewing ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Jacinta-Fernandes ◽  
Joana M. Xavier ◽  
Ramiro Magno ◽  
Joel G. Lage ◽  
Ana-Teresa Maia

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e0158801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Vigorito ◽  
Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker ◽  
Jonathan Beesley ◽  
Julian Adlard ◽  
Bjarni A. Agnarsson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dylan M. Glubb ◽  
Wei Shi ◽  
Jonathan Beesley ◽  
Laura Fachal ◽  
Jayne-Louise Pritchard ◽  
...  

Genome-wide association studies have revealed a locus at 8p12 that is associated with breast cancer risk. Fine-mapping of this locus identified 16 candidate causal variants (CCVs). However, as these variants are intergenic, their function is unclear. To map chromatin looping from this risk locus to a previously identified candidate target gene, DUSP4, we performed chromatin conformation capture analyses in normal and tumoral breast cell lines. We identified putative regulatory elements, containing CCVs, that loop to the DUSP4 promoter region. Using reporter gene assays, we found that the risk allele of CCV rs7461885 reduced the activity of a DUSP4 enhancer element, consistent with the function of DUSP4 as a tumor suppressor gene. Furthermore, the risk allele of CCV rs12155535, located in another DUSP4 enhancer element, was negatively correlated with looping of this element to the DUSP4 promoter region, suggesting that this allele would be associated with reduced expression. These findings provide the first evidence that CCV risk alleles downregulate DUSP4 expression, suggesting that this gene is a regulatory target of the 8p12 breast cancer risk locus.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Beesley ◽  
Haran Sivakumaran ◽  
Mahdi Moradi Marjaneh ◽  
Luize G. Lima ◽  
Kristine M. Hillman ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTGenome-wide association studies have identified 196 high confidence independent signals associated with breast cancer susceptibility. Variants within these signals frequently fall in distal regulatory DNA elements that control gene expression. We designed a Capture Hi-C array to enrich for chromatin interactions between the credible causal variants and target genes in six human mammary epithelial and breast cancer cell lines. We show that interacting regions are enriched for open chromatin, histone marks for active enhancers and transcription factors relevant to breast biology. We exploit this comprehensive resource to identify candidate target genes at 139 independent breast cancer risk signals, and explore the functional mechanism underlying altered risk at the 12q24 risk region. Our results demonstrate the power of combining genetics, computational genomics and molecular studies to rationalize the identification of key variants and candidate target genes at breast cancer GWAS signals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document