Outcomes and predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed classic TESE: results from a multicenter cross-sectional study

Author(s):  
Luca Boeri ◽  
Carolina Bebi ◽  
Donato Dente ◽  
Ermanno Greco ◽  
Matteo Turetti ◽  
...  
Andrology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1705-1711
Author(s):  
Edoardo Pozzi ◽  
Luca Boeri ◽  
Paolo Capogrosso ◽  
Franco Palmisano ◽  
Mirko Preto ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Serajoddin Vahidi ◽  
Nima Narimani ◽  
Saeid Abouei ◽  
Ali Sadeghi ◽  
Keivan Lorian ◽  
...  

Background: Outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) may be different in azoospermic men who undergo testicular sperm extraction (TESE) vs. microdissection-TESE (micro-TESE). Objective: This study was conducted to compare the ICSI outcomes in men who underwent TESE vs. micro-TESE due to obstructive azoospermia and nonobstructive azoospermia, respectively. Materials and Methods: A total of 310 azoospermic men who underwent ICSI from September 2016 to September 2020 were enrolled in this cross-sectional study and divided into two groups (172 cases in the TESE and 138 cases in the micro-TESE group). The paternal and maternal age, and the fertilization, biochemical pregnancy, abortion and live birth rates were compared between the two groups. Results: Maternal mean age was significantly higher in the TESE group (34.9 ± 4.2 yr vs. 32.3 ± 5.7 yr). The fertilization and biochemical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the TESE group, but the abortion rate was similar in the two groups. The live birth rate was higher in the TESE group, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.06). Also, the maternal and paternal age did not affect ICSI outcomes. Conclusion: Individuals who underwent TESE had higher fertilization and biochemical pregnancy rates than those who underwent micro-TESE, but the live birth rate was not significantly different. Keywords: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Azoospermia, Testicular sperm extraction, Microdissection testicular sperm extraction, Pregnancy outcome.


2021 ◽  
pp. 100687
Author(s):  
Sandra Patrícia Arantes do Souto ◽  
Ana Paula Prata ◽  
Rosemeire Sartori de Albuquerque ◽  
Sofia Almeida

2006 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 528-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUBA W. GOUROVA ◽  
CEES VAN DE BEEK ◽  
MARK G. SPIGT ◽  
FRED H.M. NIEMAN ◽  
PHILIP E.V.A. VAN KERREBROECK

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lulu Yuan ◽  
Bochen Pan ◽  
Weiren Wang ◽  
Lie Wang ◽  
Xujie Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Anxiety and depression are common mental health problems among patients with cancer. While many psychological variables have been proven to influence anxiety and depressive symptoms, the variables are not mutually exclusive and their integrated effects on patients with oral cancer are yet unknown. The present study aims to explore the prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms among patients with oral cancer, to find out key potentially predictive factors associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms. Method A cross-sectional study was carried out for Chinese patients with oral cancer between May 2016 and October 2017 in two Grade-A Tertiary Hospitals in Shenyang, China. 230 patients with oral cancer were interviewed with questionnaires on demographic variables, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Herth Hope Index (HHI), Social Impact Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R), Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), and General Perceived Self-efficacy Scale(GSE). Chi-square test, nonparametric test, t-test and logistic regression analyses were conducted where appropriate to explore predictive factors of anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms. Result The prevalence of anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms in the sample population was 36.96% (85/230) and 65.21% (150/230), respectively. Social isolation dimension of stigma (β=0.436, OR=1.547, CI:1.211~1.975), optimism (β=-0.276, OR=0.759, CI:0.624~0.922), and perceived stress (β=0.217, OR=1.243, CI:1.092~1.414) were predictors of anxiety symptoms. Marriage (β=1.648, OR=5.198, CI:1.427~18.924), positive readiness and expectancy dimension of hope (β=-0.505, OR=0.604, CI:0.395~0.923), social isolation dimension of stigma (β=0.314, OR=1.368, CI:1.054~1.776) and perceived stress (β=0.273, OR=1.314, CI:1.134~1.524) were predictors of depressive symptoms among oral cancer patients. Conclusion The prevalence of anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms was high among oral cancer patients in China. The communal predictors of anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with oral cancer were levels of perceived stress and social isolation of stigma. In addition, optimism was a predictor of anxiety symptoms and hope was a predictor of depressive symptoms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 454-463
Author(s):  
Ali Hussein Alek Al‐Ganmi ◽  
Abdulellah Alotaibi ◽  
Leila Gholizadeh ◽  
Lin Perry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document