scholarly journals Single-cell replication profiling to measure stochastic variation in mammalian replication timing

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Dileep ◽  
David M. Gilbert
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Dileep ◽  
David M. Gilbert

AbstractIn mammalian cells, distinct replication domains (RDs), corresponding to structural units of chromosomes called topologically-associating domains (TADs), replicate at different times during S-phase1–4. Further, early/late replication of RDs corresponds to active/inactive chromatin interaction compartments5,6. Although replication origins are selected stochastically, such that each cell is using a different cohort of origins to replicate their genomes7–12, replication-timing is regulated independently and upstream of origin selection13 and evidence suggests that replication timing is conserved in consecutive cell cycles14. Hence, quantifying the extent of cell-to-cell variation in replication timing is central to studies of chromosome structure and function. Here we devise a strategy to measure variation in single-cell replication timing using DNA copy number. We find that borders between replicated and un-replicated DNA are highly conserved between cells, demarcating active and inactive compartments of the nucleus. Nonetheless, measurable variation was evident. Surprisingly, we detected a similar degree of variation in replication timing from cell-to-cell, between homologues within cells, and between all domains genome-wide regardless of their replication timing. These results demonstrate that stochastic variation in replication timing is independent of elements that dictate timing or extrinsic environmental variation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Gnan ◽  
Joseph M. Josephides ◽  
Xia Wu ◽  
Manuela Spagnuolo ◽  
Dalila Saulebekova ◽  
...  

Mammalian genomes are replicated in a cell-type specific order and in coordination with transcription and chromatin organization. Although the field of replication is also entering the single-cell era, current studies require cell sorting, individual cell processing and have yielded a limited number (<100) of cells. Here, we have developed Kronos scRT (https://github.com/CL-CHEN-Lab/Kronos scRT), a software for single-cell Replication Timing (scRT) analysis. Kronos scRT does not require a specific platform nor cell sorting, allowing the investigation of large datasets obtained from asynchronous cells. Analysis of published available data and droplet-based scWGS data generated in the current study, allows exploitation of scRT data from thousands of cells for different mouse and human cell lines. Our results demonstrate that, although most cells replicate within a close timing range for a given genomic region, replication can also occur stochastically throughout S phase. Altogether, Kronos scRT allows investigating the RT program at a single-cell resolution for both homogeneous and heterogeneous cell populations in a fast and comprehensive manner.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 4058-4100
Author(s):  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Saori Takahashi ◽  
Takahiro Shibata ◽  
Koji Nagao ◽  
Chikashi Obuse ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lilas Courtot ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann ◽  
Valérie Bergoglio

Maintenance of the human chromosomes stability requires a tight regulation of DNA replication to duplicate once and only once the entire genome of a single cell. In mammalians cells, origin activation is controlled in space and time by a cell specific and robust program called replication timing. About 100 000 of potential origins are loaded onto the chromatin at the G1 phase but only 20-30% are selected and active during the replication of a given cell. When the replication fork is slowed down by exogenous or endogenous sources, the cell need to activate more origins to complete the replication on time. Thus, the large choice of origins that can be activated may be a key player in the protection of the genome. The aim of this review is to discuss about the role of these dormant origins as housekeepers of the human genome in response to replicative stress.


Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ichiro Hiratani ◽  
Saori Takahashi

In mammalian cells, DNA replication timing is controlled at the level of megabase (Mb)-sized chromosomal domains and correlates well with transcription, chromatin structure, and three-dimensional (3D) genome organization. Because of these properties, DNA replication timing is an excellent entry point to explore genome regulation at various levels and a variety of studies have been carried out over the years. However, DNA replication timing studies traditionally required at least tens of thousands of cells, and it was unclear whether the replication domains detected by cell population analyses were preserved at the single-cell level. Recently, single-cell DNA replication profiling methods became available, which revealed that the Mb-sized replication domains detected by cell population analyses were actually well preserved in individual cells. In this article, we provide a brief overview of our current knowledge on DNA replication timing regulation in mammals based on cell population studies, outline the findings from single-cell DNA replication profiling, and discuss future directions and challenges.


Author(s):  
Debby A. Jennings ◽  
Michael J. Morykwas ◽  
Louis C. Argenta

Grafts of cultured allogenic or autogenic keratlnocytes have proven to be an effective treatment of chronic wounds and burns. This study utilized a collagen substrate for keratinocyte and fibroblast attachment. The substrate provided mechanical stability and augmented graft manipulation onto the wound bed. Graft integrity was confirmed by light and transmission electron microscopy.Bovine Type I dermal collagen sheets (100 μm thick) were crosslinked with 254 nm UV light (13.5 Joules/cm2) to improve mechanical properties and reduce degradation. A single cell suspension of third passage neonatal foreskin fibroblasts were plated onto the collagen. Five days later, a single cell suspension of first passage neonatal foreskin keratinocytes were plated on the opposite side of the collagen. The grafts were cultured for one month.The grafts were fixed in phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde/1% glutaraldehyde for 24 hours. Graft pieces were then washed in 0.13 M phosphate buffer, post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated, and embedded in Polybed 812.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document