scholarly journals Novel method for rapid fluorescence in-situ hybridization of ALK rearrangement using non-contact alternating current electric field mixing

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Fujishima ◽  
Kazuhiro Imai ◽  
Ryuta Nakamura ◽  
Hiroshi Nanjo ◽  
Yoshitaro Saito ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaro Saito ◽  
Kazuhiro Imai ◽  
Ryuta Nakamura ◽  
Hiroshi Nanjo ◽  
Kaori Terata ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 3939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenya Tang ◽  
Lu Wang ◽  
Guilin Tang ◽  
L. Jeffrey Medeiros

In 2011, the Vysis Break Apart ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a companion diagnostic for detecting ALK rearrangement in lung cancer patients who may benefit from treatment of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. This assay is the current “gold standard”. According to updated ALK testing guidelines from the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Association for Molecular Pathology published in 2018, ALK immunohistochemistry is formally an alternative to ALK FISH, and simultaneous detection of multiple hot spots, including, at least, ALK, ROS1, RET, MET, ERBB2, BRAF and KRAS genes is also recommended while performing next generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing. Therefore, ALK status in a specimen can be tested by different methods and platforms, even in the same institution or laboratory. In this review, we discuss several clinically relevant technical aspects of ALK FISH, including pros and cons of the unique two-step (50- to 100-cell) analysis approach employed in the Vysis Break Apart ALK FISH assay, including: the preset cutoff value of ≥15% for a positive result; technical aspects and biology of discordant results obtained by different methods; and incidental findings, such as ALK copy number gain or amplification and co-existent driver mutations. These issues have practical implications for ALK testing in the clinical laboratory following the updated guidelines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 109-114
Author(s):  
Manish Kumar ◽  
Kishore Kumar ◽  
Harinder Pal Singh ◽  
Suresh Nair ◽  
Amol Patel ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims This study aims to evaluate the incidence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) incorporating fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) methods and to look for any discordance. Methods We evaluated 101 samples obtained from an enriched cohort of NSCLCs patients from the Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India, between November 2016 and November 2018. IHC was performed using the highly-sensitive D5F3 rabbit monoclonal primary antibody. FISH was performed with dual-color, break-apart probe (ZytoLight SPEC) on formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded tissue. Discordance between IHC and FISH for ALK rearrangements was evaluated. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was performed to identify any association of ALK presence (by IHC and FISH) with smoking brain metastasis, programmed death-ligand (PD-L1) expression, pleural effusion, and histopathological subtype. Results A total of 7.92% (8/101) cases tested by IHC and 9.9% (10/101) cases tested by FISH were positive for ALK rearrangement. Of 93 ALK IHC-negative cases, 4 were ALK FISH-positive, whereas of 91 ALK FISH-negative cases, 4 were ALK IHC-positive cases. The correlation analysis demonstrated no or very weak correlation in ALK mutations by IHC or FISH with smoking, brain metastasis, PD-L1 expression, pleural effusion, and histopathological examination, except a weak positive correlation (r = 0.33) observed between brain metastasis and ALK rearrangement identified by FISH. Conclusions Our study demonstrated a somewhat similar incidence of ALK FISH-positive cases and ALK IHC-positive cases, though the incidence was numerically higher for ALK-FISH method.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4857-4857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herve Avet-Loiseau ◽  
Soraya Wuilleme ◽  
Nelly Robillard ◽  
Laurence Lode ◽  
Florence Magrangeas ◽  
...  

Abstract Ploidy appears as an important parameter in both the biology and the clinical evolution of multiple myeloma. However, its evaluation requires either a successful karyotyping (obtained in 30% of the patients), or a DNA index calculation by flow cytometry (not routinely performed in myeloma). We validated a novel method for the detection of hyperdiploidy based on interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) that can be utilized on almost all patients. We selected a 3-color probe set composed of probes specific for chromosomes 5, 9, and 15. Two hundred and five patients with myeloma were analyzed by flow cytometry (DNA Index) and FISH, and results obtained by both techniques were then compared. As shown in the table, FISH was very specific and sensitive for the detection of hyperdiploidy. Only 6 of the 104 hyperdiploid patients, all with a low hyperdiploidy (DNA Index <1.10), were classified as diploid by FISH. Extended studies looking for t(4;14), t(11;14), and del(13q14) showed that most recurrent 14q32 translocations occur in non-hyperdiploid clones, and that deletions of chromosome 13 were less frequently observed in hyperdiploid clones (48% vs 66%). These data confirmed that chromosomal abnormalities are not randomly distributed in myeloma and that FISH allows analysis of all the major chromosomal abnormalities. Further large studies are ongoing to evaluate the prognostic value of ploidy in myeloma and to correlate the true prognostic value of all chromosomal abnormalities. Diploid by FISH Hyperdiploid by FISH Tetraploid by FISH t(11;14) t(4;14) del(13q14) DNA index < 1 7 3 2 3 DNA index=1–1.04 91 42 17 61 DNA index=1.05–1.5 6 98 7 7 50 DNA index >1.6 3 1 2


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document