scholarly journals Effect of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique on small-medium size macular holes

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanako Yamada ◽  
Akio Oishi ◽  
Mao Kusano ◽  
Hirofumi Kinoshita ◽  
Eiko Tsuiki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
External Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Postoperative Visual Acuity ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractInverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique was developed to achieve macular hole (MH) closure in large MH and refractory cases. In this study, we evaluate the effect of the technique for small-medium size MH. We recruited patients who underwent vitrectomy for small-medium size (< 400 μm) MH with either inverted ILM flap technique (flap group) or with conventional ILM peeling (peeling group). Using propensity score, 21 eyes of 21 patients in the peeling group were matched against 21 eyes of 21 patients in the flap group. We compared MH closure rate, postoperative visual acuity, and recovery of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ). The MH closure rate was not different between the two groups (flap vs peeling: 90% vs 100%, P = 0.49). Whereas there was no significant difference in visual acuity improvement between the two groups, the flap group showed more disruption of the ELM 3 months after surgery and of the EZ at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P = 0.02, P = 0.03, and P = 0.04, respectively). The result suggested that inverted ILM flap technique does not have additional benefits for small-medium size MHs and may delay recovery of retinal integrity.

scholarly journals Effect of Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique on Normal Size Macular Holes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanako Yamada ◽  
Akio Oishi ◽  
Mao Kusano ◽  
Hirofumi Kinoshita ◽  
Eiko Tsuiki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
External Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Postoperative Visual Acuity ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique was developed to achieve macular hole (MH) closure in large MH and refractory cases. In this study, we evaluate the effect of the technique for normal size MH. We recruited patients who underwent vitrectomy for normal size (< 400 µm) MH with either inverted ILM flap technique (flap group) or with conventional ILM peeling (peeling group). Using propensity score,21 eyes of 21 patients in the peeling group were matched against 21 eyes of 21 patients in the flap group. we compared MH closure rate, postoperative visual acuity, and recovery of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ). The MH closure rate was not different between the two groups (flap vs peeling: 90% vs 100%, P = 0.49). Whereas there was no significant difference in visual acuity improvement between the two groups, the flap group showed more disruption of the ELM 3 months after surgery and of the EZ at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P = 0.02, P = 0.03, and P = 0.04, respectively). The result suggested that inverted ILM flap technique does not have additional benefits for normal size MHs and may delay recovery of retinal integrity.

scholarly journals Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Guo Yu ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Yi Xiang
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Macular Holes

Background: Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of macular holes (MHs). However, there is a possibility of poor postoperative anatomical closure with conventional ILM peeling for MHs larger than 400 μm. Therefore, a novel inverted ILM flap technique was developed for such cases. Objectives: This meta-analysis study was performed to evaluate and compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of the inverted ILM flap technique and ILM peeling in large MHs. Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The trial eligibility and risk of bias were assessed according to Cochrane review methods. The primary outcome measures included MH closure rate and postoperative visual acuity (VA). Subgroup analysis of postoperative VA based on follow-up time was also conducted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Five RCTs with a total of 155 eyes in the inverted ILM flap group and 161 eyes in the ILM peeling group were included in this meta-analysis. Statistical meta-analysis revealed that the overall MH closure rate in the inverted ILM flap group was significantly higher than that in the ILM peeling group (OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.25 to 7.66; P = 0.01). The postoperative VA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than ILM peeling group (WMD, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.07; P = 0.0002). The subgroup meta-analysis indicated that the postoperative VA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than ILM peeling group (WMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.08; P = 0.0004) at the 3-month follow-up. However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups at the 6-month follow-up (WMD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.02; P = 0.10). Conclusions: Vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap technique showed a higher anatomical closure rate as well as visual gain—although only in the short-term as no difference in visual recovery was found at the 6-month follow-up—than did ILM peeling in large MHs. The inverted ILM flap technique should be considered as a preferred and routine procedure for the treatment of patients with MHs larger than 400 µm.

scholarly journals Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prithvi Ramtohul ◽  
Eric Parrat ◽  
Danièle Denis ◽  
Umberto Lorenzi
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
External Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and the complete ILM removal in the treatment of large stage 4 macular hole (MH) > 400 μm and to evaluate reconstructive anatomical changes in foveal microstructure using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Methods This is a retrospective, consecutive, nonrandomized comparative study of patients affected by idiopathic, myopic or traumatic stage 4 MH (minimum diameter > 400 μm) treated with 25-gauge pars-plana vitrectomy with either complete ILM peeling (n = 23, Group 1) or inverted ILM flap technique (n = 23, Group 2), between August 2016 and August 2018. Main outcomes measured were the MH closure rate assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at six months. Foveal microstructure reconstructive changes were evaluated using SD-OCT to determine predictive factors of postoperative BCVA. Results Closure of MH was achieved in 16/23 cases of Group 1 (70%) and in 22/23 cases of the Group 2 (96%). Surgical failure was reported in 6 cases of Group 1 and 1 case of Group 2. The MH closure rate was significantly higher with the inverted ILM flap technique (P-value = 0.02). Average BCVA (LogMAR) changed from 1.04 ± 0.32 to 0.70 ± 0.31 in Group 1 and from 0.98 ± 0.22 to 0.45 ± 0.25 in Group 2 (P-value = 0.005) at 6 months. Improvement in BCVA (> 0.3 LogMAR units) was statistically higher in the Group 2 (P-value = 0.03). Restoration of foveal microstructure was significantly higher in the Group 2 at 6 months (52% vs 9%, P-value < 0.01). In Group 2, the integrity of the external limiting membrane at 3 months postoperatively was the only significant feature correlated with postoperative BCVA at 6 months (r = 0.562; P-Value = 0.01, forward stepwise regression analysis). Conclusion Inverted ILM flap technique is more effective than the classic ILM peeling for the closure of large stage 4 MHs > 400 μm, improving both anatomical and functional outcomes. Early recovery of the external limiting membrane at 3 months is a positive predictive value of postoperative BCVA 6 months after inverted ILM flap technique.

scholarly journals Conventional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Versus Temporal Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Large Macular Holes: A Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurullah Koçak ◽  
Volkan Yeter ◽  
Hakkı Birinci
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Hole Closure ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Purpose: To compare the anatomical, morphological, and functional outcomes of the conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs). Subjects and Methods: Forty-six eyes of 44 patients with a minimum base diameter > 600 µm were included in this retrospective interventional study. The patients were divided into Group 1 (conventional ILM peeling) and Group 2 (temporal inverted ILM flap). The hole closure rate, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ellipsoid zone (EZ), and external limiting membrane (ELM) defects were analyzed at baseline and 6 months after surgery.Results: Hole closure was achieved in 17/25 (68%) cases of Group 1 and 20/21 (95.2%) cases of Group 2. The hole closure rate was significantly higher in the temporal inverted ILM flap group (p = 0.022). The mean BCVA (logMAR) changed from 1.12 ± 0.43 to 0.72 ± 0.31 in Group 1 and from 1.07 ± 0.34 to 0.51 ± 0.26 in Group 2 at six months (p < 0.001 in both cases). U-shaped closure was observed in 3 (12%) eyes in Group 1 and 15 (71.4%) eyes in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The total restoration rates of ELM and EZ were significantly higher in the temporal inverted ILM flap group (p = 0.009, p = 0.001, respectively).Conclusion: The temporal inverted ILM flap technique is more effective than conventional ILM peeling for larger than 600 µm macular holes and improves anatomical, morphological, and functional outcomes.

Foveal microstructure and visual outcomes of myopic macular hole surgery with or without the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
pp. 1495-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu-Ting Hu ◽  
Qin-Tuo Pan ◽  
Jing-Wei Zheng ◽  
Zong-Duan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Detachment ◽  
Macular Hole ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Hyperreflective Foci ◽  
Retinal Reattachment ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Myopic Macular Hole

PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique on the macular hole (MH) closure and foveal microstructure recovery of patients with highly myopic MH.MethodsPars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade with the inverted ILM flap technique (19 eyes) or with the ILM peeling technique (21 eyes) were performed in patients with highly myopic MH with or without retinal detachment. The rate of MH closure and retinal reattachment, the reconstructive anatomical change of the foveal microstructure and the best-corrected visual acuities (BCVA) of the two groups were compared.ResultsThe anatomic closure rate was statistically significantly higher in the inverted group (100%) than in the peeling group (66.7%; p=0.009). All eyes with MH retinal detachment had successful retinal reattachment in these two groups. However, the rate of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) (p=0.020), as well as gliosis (p=0.049) in macular area, detected by OCT, was significantly greater in the inverted group than in the peeling group. The postoperative BCVA was significantly better in the eyes with ELM, EZ (p=0.031) and gliosis (p=0.008), but without hyperreflective foci (p=0.001).ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that the inverted ILM flap technique has better efficacy than the ILM peeling technique for patients with myopic MH in closure rate, foveal microstructure and postoperative BCVA.

scholarly journals Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Extra Large Macular Holes

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 07-13
Author(s):  
Ogugua Ndubuisi Okonkwo ◽  
Adekunle Olubola Hassan ◽  
Olufemi Oderinlo
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Snellen Visual Acuity ◽  
Sd Oct

Aim: To investigate the outcome of the inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) flap technique for extra large idiopathic macular holes (MHs).Methods: A retrospective non-comparative surgical case series of seven eyes of 7 patients with MHs (base diameter of at least 1000 ?m) was conducted. All the MHs were treated using pars plana vitrectomy and brilliant blue G (BBG)-assisted inverted ILM flap technique. Spectral Domain- Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) images were used to assess the anatomical outcomes of surgery including the macular microstructure, while Best Corrected Snellen Visual Acuity (BCSVA) was used to evaluate the functional outcomes.Results: The average MH size was 1241microns and average symptom duration was nineteen months. All eyes achieved successful anatomical closure and there was no occurrence of a flat open type closure. SD-OCT microstructural study revealed a reconstruction of the Ellispod Zone (EZ) and External Limiting Membrane (ELM), in only 3 eyes. There was an improvement in visual acuity in 5 eyes, while 2 eyes maintained the same as pre operative vision. The largest increase in post operative visual acuity gain was a 4-line improvement in Best Corrected Snellen Visual Acuity (BCSVA) noted in one of the 3 eyes with reconstructed EZ and ELM. The 3 months symptom duration in this patient was the shortest in this series.Conclusion: Inverted ILM flap technique is a safe and effective approach for the management of extra large chronic idiopathic MHs with demonstrably good anatomical and limited functional results in a majority of cases. Postoperative reconstruction of the microstructure is however seen only in a minority of eyes. Despite an absence of the outer retina (EZ and ELM), some eyes still experience an improvement in vision. The symptom duration may play a vital role in functional outcome in this subset of extra large chronic MHs.

Comparative analysis of large macular hole surgery using an internal limiting membrane insertion versus inverted flap technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Ho Park ◽  
Seung Min Lee ◽  
Sung Who Park ◽  
Ji Eun Lee ◽  
Ik Soo Byon
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Complete Resolution ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Insertion Technique ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Swept Source ◽  
Minimum Diameter ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Comparative Clinical Study ◽  
Hole Closure

BackgroundTo determine whether the internal limiting membrane (ILM) insertion technique is as effective as the inverted ILM flap technique for the initial surgical treatment of eyes with large idiopathic macular holes (MHs).MethodsThis retrospective, non-randomised, comparative clinical study included 41 eyes with large MHs (minimum diameter >500 µm) that were treated using the ILM insertion technique or the inverted ILM flap technique. The hole closure rate, postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and swept source optical coherence tomography findings were analysed at 6 months after surgery.ResultsThere were 15 and 26 eyes in the insertion and inverted flap groups, respectively. Hole closure was achieved in all eyes. The mean final BCVA was better in the inverted flap group than in the insertion group (0.527 vs 0.773, p=0.006), although significant postoperative improvements were observed in both groups (p<0.001). Postoperative foveal discolouration was more common in the insertion group than in the inverted flap group (86.7% vs 7.7%, p<0.001). Complete resolution of ellipsoid zone and external limiting membrane defects was observed in 7 and 18 eyes, respectively, in the inverted flap group; in contrast, complete resolution was not observed in any of the eyes in the insertion group (p=0.035 and p<0.001, respectively).ConclusionThe ILM insertion technique may be as effective as the inverted ILM flap technique for the closure of large MHs. However, the latter technique results in better recovery of photoreceptor layers and, consequently, better postoperative visual acuity.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Large Idiopathic Macular Holes Surgery in Patients at A Tertiary Care Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (217) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Shakya ◽  
Ram Prasad Pokhrel ◽  
Om Krishna Malla
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Base Diameter ◽  
Flap Technique ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Idiopathic Macular Holes ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Large macular holes cause significant reduction in central visual acuity. The aim ofthe study is to find out short term anatomical and visual outcomes of inverted internal limitingmembrane flaps technique for large macular holes (base diameter>1000μm) surgery in patientsat a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital fromJanuary 2018 to December 2018 after ethical clearance from the institutional review committee.The study was done in 12 patients with idiopathic macular holes (base diameter>1000μm), theywere repaired with 25 gauge pars plana vitrectomy with brilliant blue assisted large invertedinternal limiting membrane flap technique. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0. Results: All twelve eyes had complete anatomical closure. Mean best corrected visualacuity preoperatively was 1.48 logMAR±0.246. The mean macular hole base diameter was1217.0±196.77μm. The mean age of patients was 68.75±4.97 years. Postoperatively,mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.978 logMAR±0.12. There were no postoperativecomplications. All the patients perceived decreased size of central scotoma. Conclusions: Inverted internal limiting membrane flaps for large macular holes is suitable methodfor closure of the very large hole, restoration of functional vision and decreased size of centralscotoma.

scholarly journals Comparison of Anatomical and Visual Outcomes between Idiopathic and Myopic Macular Holes Using the Internal Limiting Membrane or Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Peralta Iturburu ◽  
Claudia Garcia-Arumi ◽  
Maria Bové Alvarez ◽  
Jose Garcia-Arumi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Hole ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Ilm Peeling ◽  
Visual Outcomes ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Idiopathic Macular Holes

Purpose. To compare the results of vitrectomy with those of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or inverted ILM flap for treating myopic or idiopathic macular hole. Methods. Thirty-nine eyes of 39 patients undergoing vitrectomy with ILM peeling for macular hole (25 idiopathic and 14 myopic) and 27 eyes of 27 patients undergoing vitrectomy with inverted ILM flap (15 idiopathic and 12 myopic) were included. Outcome measures were macular hole closure by optical coherence tomography and visual acuity at 6 months. Results. Closure was achieved in 25 (100%) idiopathic and 12 (86%) myopic macular holes in the ILM peeling group and in 14 (93%) idiopathic and 11 (91.77%) macular holes in the inverted ILM flap group. There were no statistically significant differences in restoration of the external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone between the groups. Median best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution) at the end of follow-up was 0.22 (20/32 Snellen) in idiopathic and 0.4 (20/50) in myopic (P=0.042) patients in the ILM peeling group and 0.4 (20/50) in idiopathic and 0.4 (20/50) in myopic (P=0.652) patients in the inverted ILM flap group. Conclusion. Both techniques were associated with high closure rates in myopic and idiopathic macular holes, with somewhat better visual outcomes in idiopathic cases. The small sample size may have provided insufficient power to support the superiority of one technique over the other in the two groups.

Autologous internal limiting membrane transplant for recurrent idiopathic macular holes

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212090639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommaso Rossi ◽  
Carlandrea Trillo ◽  
Guido Ripandelli
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Hole ◽  
Outer Segment ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Macular Holes ◽  
Idiopathic Macular Holes

Purpose: To report a series of recurrent idiopathic macular holes treated by means of a free autologous internal limiting membrane flap and compare visual and anatomic results to a control group undergoing further internal limiting membrane peeling and novel gas tamponade. Methods: Retrospective surgical series of 15 consecutive patients receiving autologous internal limiting membrane flap compared to 14 patients operated on for internal limiting membrane peeling enlargement. Autologous internal limiting membrane flap was created after brilliant blue G staining, internal limiting membrane lifting, perfluorocarbon bubble injection and creation of a wide internal limiting membrane free flap translocated underneath perfluorocarbon liquid, to the macular hole bed. Both groups were tamponated with 20% SF6 and positioned face down for 4 h a day for 3 days. Results: Macular hole closed in 14/15 (93.3%) patients of the autologous internal limiting membrane group and 9/14 (64.2%) controls (p < 0.05). Visual acuity increased from 0.05 ± 0.03 to 0.23 ± 0.13 Snellen in the autologous internal limiting membrane group and from 0.05 ± 0.03 to 0.14 ± 0.10 Snellen of controls (p < 0.05 for both). Vision of the autologous internal limiting membrane group improved more than controls at 1 month (p = 0.043) and 3 months (p = 0.045). Inner segment/outer segment interruption at 3 months was smaller in the autologous internal limiting membrane group than controls, reducing from 1230 ± 288 µm at baseline to 611 ± 245 and 547 ± 204 µm at 3 months versus 1196 ± 362, 745 ± 222 and 705 ± 223 µm, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Autologous internal limiting membrane flap can effectively close recurrent idiopathic macular holes with a higher closure rate, smaller residual inner segment/outer segment line interruption and higher visual acuity at 3 months than previous standard of care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document