scholarly journals Radiotherapy for brain metastasis and long-term survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kawngwoo Park ◽  
Gi Hwan Bae ◽  
Woo Kyung Kim ◽  
Chan-Jong Yoo ◽  
Cheol Wan Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Primary Lung Cancer ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Difference ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractPatients with brain metastases (BM) can benefit from radiotherapy (RT), although the long-term benefits of RT remain unclear. We searched a Korean national health insurance claims database and identified 135,740 patients with newly diagnosed BM during 2002–2017. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to evaluate survival according to RT modality, which included whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The 84,986 eligible patients were followed for a median interval of 6.6 months, and 37,046 patients underwent RT (43.6%). After the PSM, patients who underwent RT had significantly better overall survival after 1 year (42.4% vs. 35.3%, P < 0.001), although there was no significant difference at 2.6 years, and patients who did not undergo RT had better survival after 5 years. Among patients with BM from lung cancer, RT was also associated with a survival difference after 1 year (57.3% vs. 32.8%, P < 0.001) and a median survival increase of 3.7 months. The 1-year overall survival rate was significantly better for SRS than for WBRT (46.4% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001). Among Korean patients with BM, especially patients with primary lung cancer, RT improved the short-term survival rate, and SRS appears to be more useful than WBRT in this setting.

scholarly journals 372 Short- And Long-Term Outcome of Pneumonectomy for Lung Cancer: 20 Years’ Experience of a Single Centre

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Amran ◽  
A Hussain ◽  
A C Din ◽  
M Cowen ◽  
M Chaudhry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Primary Lung Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Modality ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
National Mortality ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Introduction Surgery is the most important therapeutic modality for the treatment of primary lung cancer. Studies normally reported as 30-days or 90-days post-operative mortality or 5-years survival. However, survival for ≥10-years is rarely mentioned. Method Retrospective data collection from a tertiary centre database was implemented which include patients who underwent pneumonectomy from January 1998 until November 2019. The data was analysed for short and long-term outcomes including their respective Thoracoscore. Results 268 patients who had pneumonectomy were selected, in majority for lung cancer. 79.1% were male with mean age is 63. Overall operative mortality in this cohort was 4.9% while reported national mortality for pneumonectomy for lung cancer is 7%. No 30-days post-operative mortality in the last 5 years. The 5,10- and 15-years survival rate for patients are 36.9%, 23.9% and 20.3% respectively. This showed significant increase in the survival rate for 5- and 10-years post-pneumonectomy in comparison to previous study. Long-term survival was better in female with age &lt;70 years. The overall survival rate &gt;15 years is 0.4%. Conclusions This study shows that our operative mortality for pneumonectomy is significantly lower (30% less) than national mortality. This confirms that pneumonectomy is still an effective modality in the treatment of lung cancer.

scholarly journals The Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Gastric Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482199743
Author(s):  
Ke Chen ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Zheling Chen
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
And Control

Background: Treatment options for advanced gastric esophageal cancer are quite limited. Chemotherapy is unavoidable at certain stages, and research on targeted therapies has mostly failed. The advent of immunotherapy has brought hope for the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze the safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and the long-term survival of patients who were diagnosed as gastric esophageal cancer and received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Method: Studies on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy of advanced gastric esophageal cancer published before February 1, 2020 were searched online. The survival (e.g. 6-month overall survival, 12-month overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR)) and adverse effects of immunotherapy were compared to that of control therapy (physician’s choice of therapy). Results: After screening 185 studies, 4 comparative cohort studies which reported the long-term survival of patients receiving immunotherapy were included. Compared to control group, the 12-month survival (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.12, P < 0.0001) and 18-month survival (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.39 to 2.81, P = 0.0001) were significantly longer in immunotherapy group. The 3-month survival rate (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.36 to 3.06, P = 0.92) and 18-month survival rate (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.98 to 2.12, P = 0.07) were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group. The ORR were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.65 to 3.66, P = 0.01). Meta-analysis pointed out that in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 sub group population, the immunotherapy could obviously benefit the patients in tumor response rates (OR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.89 to 7.61, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: For the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy was superior to that of chemotherapy or palliative care.

Aggressive Treatment in Glioblastoma: What Determines the Survival of Patients?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Yu ◽  
Guozhong Zhang ◽  
Songtao Qi
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Control Cohort ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Long Term Survivors

Abstract Background and Study Aims The exact reason of long-term survival in glioblastoma (GBM) patients has remained uncertain. Molecular parameters in addition to histology to define malignant gliomas are hoped to facilitate clinical, experimental, and epidemiological studies. Material and Methods A population of GBM patients with similar clinical characteristics (especially similar resectability) was reviewed to compare the molecular variables between poor (overall survival [OS] < 18 months, control cohort) and long-term survivors (overall survival > 36 months, OS-36 cohort). Results Long-term GBM survivors were younger. In the OS-36 cohort, the positive rate of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation was very low (7.69%, 3/39) and there was no statistical difference in OS between IDH mutant and wild-type patients. The results of 1p/19q codeletions are similar. Besides, there were no significant difference in MGMT promoter methylation, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation, and TP53 mutations between OS-36 cohort and control cohort. Conclusions No distinct markers consistently have been identified in long-term survivors of GBM patients, and great importance should be attached to further understand the biological characteristics of the invasive glioma cells because of the nature of diffuse tumor permeation.

SP6.1.11 The Effect of the Enhanced Recovery Programme for Liver Surgery on Long Term Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalaiyarasi Arujunan ◽  
Abdulwarith Shugaba ◽  
Harmony Uwadiae ◽  
Joel Lambert ◽  
Georgios Sgourakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Aims The Enhanced Recovery Programme for Liver Surgery (ERPLS) has been shown to promote functional recovery and reduce hospital stay. However, its effect on long term survival has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the ERPLS on 5-year patient survival. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) between January 2011 and December 2016 at a regional hepatobiliary centre. The cohort comprised of 60 pre-ERPLS and 60 post-ERPLS patients. The primary outcome was 5-year patient survival. The secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications and 90-day readmission rates. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of overall survival. Results There was no significant difference in the age (p = 0.960), gender (p = 0.332) and type of resection (p = 0.198) between both groups. ERPLS was not an independent predictor for overall survival (Gehan Wilcoxon Test, p = 0.828). There was no significant difference in the LOS (p = 0.874) and 90-day readmission rates (p = 0.349). Major postoperative complications (&gt;3a Clavien-Dindo classification) were significantly less in the ERPLS group (p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, positive resection margins and major postoperative complications were independent predictors for overall survival. Conclusions ERPLS does not seem to have an effect on long term patient survival. However, it appears to reduce the rate of major postoperative complications. LOS and 90-day readmission rates were not influenced by ERPLS.

scholarly journals Long-term survival of locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and perspectives for the treatment with immunotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Vrankar ◽  
Karmen Stanic
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc

Abstract Background Standard treatment for patients with inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Five-year overall survival rates range between 15 and 25%, while long term survival data are rarely reported. Patients and methods A total of 102 patients with stage III NSCLC treated between September 2005 and November 2010 with induction chemotherapy and CCRT were included in this long term survival analysis. All patients were tested for PD-L1 status and expression of PD-L1 was correlated with overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicities. Results The median OS of all patients was 24.8 months (95% CI 18.7 to 31.0) with 10 year-survival rate of 11.2%. The median OS of patients with PD-L1 expression was 12.1 months (95% CI 0.1 to 26.2), while in patients with negative or unknown PD-L1 status was significantly longer, 25.2 months (95% CI 18.9 to 31.6), p = 0.005. The median PFS of all patients was 16.4 months (95% CI 13.0 to 19.9). PFS of patients with PD-L1 expression was 10.1 months (95% CI 0.1 to 20.4) and in patients with negative or unknown PD-L1 status was 17.9 months (95% CI 14.2 to 21.7), p = 0.003. Conclusions 10-year overall survival of stage III NSCLC patients after CCRT is 11.2%. PFS and OS differ with regard to PD-L1 status and are significantly shorter for patients with PD-L1 expression. New treatment with check-point inhibitors combined with RT therefore seems reasonable strategy to improve these results.

Improved survival for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 560-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Mitus ◽  
K B Miller ◽  
D P Schenkein ◽  
H F Ryan ◽  
S K Parsons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acute Myelogenous ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE Despite improvement in chemotherapy and supportive care over the past two decades, overall survival for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) remains poor; only 25% to 30% of individuals with this disorder will be cured. In 1987, we initiated a prospective multiinstitution study designed to improve long-term survival in adults with AML. METHODS We modified the usual 7-day treatment scheme of daunorubicin and cytarabine with high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) on days 8 through 10 (3 + 7 + 3). Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) was offered to all patients who entered complete remission (CR) to decrease the rate of leukemic relapse. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. RESULTS CRs were achieved in 84 of 94 patients (89%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83 to 95). Because of the high remission rate, factors previously thought to predict outcome, such as cytogenetics, WBC count, French-American-British (FAB) classification, sex, and age, were not useful prognostic variables. The overall survival rate for the entire cohort of patients from data of diagnosis is 55% at 5 years. Sixty percent of all patients who achieved a CR underwent marrow grafting. There was no significant difference in event-free survival (EFS) at 5 years comparing patients assigned to receive allogeneic BMT with patients assigned to receive autologous BMT (56% v 45%, P = .54). CONCLUSION The long-term disease-free survival observed in this study is excellent compared with historical data. This improvement in survival is probably due to the high rate of remission induction, as well as to the effective nature of the consolidation therapy.

scholarly journals CMET-40. IMPACT OF WHOLE BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY ON LEPTOMENINGEAL METASTASIS FROM NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi60-vi60
Author(s):  
Lei Wen ◽  
Zhaoming Zhou ◽  
Junjie Zhen ◽  
Cheng Zhou ◽  
Mingyao Lai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Leptomeningeal Metastasis ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Intravenous Chemotherapy ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Abstract BACKGROUND Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a detrimental complication of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its incidence has increased due to recent improvements in survival. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on survival. METHODS Seventy-four consecutive patients diagnosed with LM from NSCLC between 2009 and 2018 in Sanjiu Brain Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS The median age was 54.5 (range 30–76) years. LM were diagnosed by MRI (36/74), cytology (4/74), or both (34/74). Eighteen patients (24.3%) were diagnosed at the initial presentation of lung cancer. Forty-seven (63.5%) patients harboring EGFR positive mutation while other twenty-seven patients (36.5%) were EGFR wild type. The median overall survival from diagnosis of LM was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval: 5.2 to 11.0). Patients who received EGFR-TKIs after LM had longer survival than those who did not (10.5 vs. 4.4 months, p＜0.001). No significant differences in survival were seen between patients who were treated with WBRT and those without, whether in EGFR mutation positive patients (11.6 vs. 15.0 months, p=0.353), or in EGFR wild type ones (5.1 vs. 3.3 months, p=0.116). Similarly, intravenous chemotherapy after LM had no impact on overall survival (7.5 vs. 8.1 months, p=0.9). CONCLUSION Median overall survival was higher than historical experience in our retrospective analysis. Survival was not improved by WBRT or intravenous chemotherapy. EGFR-TKIs could prolong survival of patients with LM from NSCLC.

scholarly journals Comparison of prognosis between emergency and scheduled hemodialysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 1221-1231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhixiang Bian ◽  
Huiyi Gu ◽  
Peihua Chen ◽  
Shijian Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapies

Background The survival rate of patients undergoing hemodialysis and other renal replacement therapies has been extensively studied, but comparative studies of emergency and scheduled hemodialysis are limited. Methods This study included 312 patients who underwent emergency hemodialysis and 274 who received scheduled hemodialysis. We investigated the prognostic differences between these two groups of patients, including the short-term and long-term survival rates. Results The overall survival rate was significantly better among the patients in the scheduled hemodialysis group than emergency hemodialysis group. The mortality rate within 3 months of emergency hemodialysis was 4.8%, while that within 3 months of scheduled hemodialysis was 1.1%. Conclusions Significant differences were present between emergency and scheduled hemodialysis, especially the levels of serum creatinine and hemoglobin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document