scholarly journals Privacy and uniqueness of neighborhoods in social networks

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Romanini ◽  
Sune Lehmann ◽  
Mikko Kivelä

AbstractThe ability to share social network data at the level of individual connections is beneficial to science: not only for reproducing results, but also for researchers who may wish to use it for purposes not foreseen by the data releaser. Sharing such data, however, can lead to serious privacy issues, because individuals could be re-identified, not only based on possible nodes’ attributes, but also from the structure of the network around them. The risk associated with re-identification can be measured and it is more serious in some networks than in others. While various optimization algorithms have been proposed to anonymize networks, there is still only a limited theoretical understanding of which network features are important for the privacy problem. Using network models and real data, we show that the average degree of networks is a crucial parameter for the severity of re-identification risk from nodes’ neighborhoods. Dense networks are more at risk, and, apart from a small band of average degree values, either almost all nodes are uniquely re-identifiable or they are all safe. Our results allow researchers to assess the privacy risk based on a small number of network statistics which are available even before the data is collected. As a rule-of-thumb, the privacy risks are high if the average degree is above 10. Guided by these results, we explore sampling of edges as a strategy to mitigate the re-identification risk of nodes. This approach can be implemented during the data collection phase, and its effect on various network measures can be estimated and corrected using sampling theory. The new understanding of the uniqueness of neighborhoods in networks presented in this work can support the development of privacy-aware ways of designing network data collection procedures, anonymization methods, and sharing network data.

Author(s):  
Michael Farrugia ◽  
Neil Hurley ◽  
Diane Payne ◽  
Aaron Quigley

In this chapter, the authors will discuss the differences between manual data collection and electronic data collection to understand the advantages and the challenges brought by electronic social network data. They will discuss in detail the processes that are used to transform electronic data to social network data and the procedures that can be used to validate the resultant social network.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie D. Crawford ◽  
Dorie Josma ◽  
Kristin R.V. Harrington ◽  
Joseph Morris ◽  
Alvan Quamina ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Characteristics of one’s social network have been important factors in understanding infectious disease transmission patterns. Social network data collection is generally time and resource intensive, yet is crucial to our understanding of the complex epidemiologic landscape of human behaviors among stigmatized social groups. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a self-administered social network data collection tool, Network Canvas, among Black MSM (BMSM) and transgender persons using the think aloud method, which is a robust and flexible research technique used to perform usability testing. METHODS We piloted a self-administered network interview within the Network Canvas Software Suite. Participants ≥ 18 years were recruited through a community-based organization in Atlanta, GA and were included based upon willingness to share information on sexual behaviors and drug use for themselves and their social networks. A semi-structured interview guide was used to document cognitive decision-making processes while using the tool. Recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematic analyses were performed. RESULTS Among seven BMSM and transgender participants, three main themes were identified from cognitive processes: Network Canvas’s utility, navigation, and intuitive design. Overall, Network Canvas was described as ‘easy to use,’ with suggestions mainly directed toward improving navigation tools and implementing an initial tutorial on the program prior to use. Participants were willing to use Network Canvas to document their social networks and characteristics. In general, observed verbal responses from participants matched their behavior although there were some discrepancies between verbal affirmations of use and understanding versus external observation. CONCLUSIONS We found Network Canvas to be a useful new tool to capture social network data. Self-administration allowed for more autonomy for participants when providing sensitive information about themselves and their social networks. Further, automated name generation and visualization of one’s social network in the application has the potential to reduce cognitive burden during data collection. More efficient methods of social network data collection have the potential to provide epidemiologic information to guide prevention efforts for populations with stigmatized health conditions or behaviors.


Author(s):  
jimi adams ◽  
Tatiane Santos ◽  
Venice Ng Williams

This chapter provides an overview of social network data collection strategies. We begin by outlining the primary principles of sampling and measurement design, then describing how those combine into what is labeled the “boundary specification problem” for social network research. We accompany these definitions with examples of how these elements are applied across ego, partial, and complete network designs. Next, the chapter turns to the primary ways that network data have been evaluated, highlighting both the implications of those evaluations for their use in network analyses and various strategies for how the identified limitations can be leveraged for optimal data and analytic quality. The chapter concludes by addressing some of the ethical considerations that are unique to the gathering and analyses of social network data.


2012 ◽  
pp. 183-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fehmi Ben Abdesslem ◽  
Iain Parris ◽  
Tristan Henderson

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
jimi adams ◽  
Tatiane Santos ◽  
Venice Ng Williams

This chapter provides an overview of social network data collection strategies. We begin by outlining the primary principles of sampling and measurement design, then describing how those combine into what is labeled as the “boundary specification problem” for social network research. We accompany these definitions with examples of how these elements are applied across ego-, partial- and complete- network designs. Next, the chapter turns to the primary ways that network data have been evaluated, highlighting both the implications of those evaluations for their use in network analyses, and various strategies for how the identified limitations can be leveraged for optimal data and analytic quality. The chapter concludes by addressing some of the ethical considerations that are unique to the gathering and analyses of social network data.


Author(s):  
Stephen T. Ricken ◽  
Richard P. Schuler ◽  
Sukeshini A. Grandhi ◽  
Quentin Jones

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document