scholarly journals Validity of self-reported energy intake in lean and obese young women, using two nutrient databases, compared with total energy expenditure assessed by doubly labeled water

2001 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 940-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
JL Weber ◽  
PM Reid ◽  
KA Greaves ◽  
JP DeLany ◽  
VA Stanford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Total Energy ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Total Energy Expenditure ◽  
Doubly Labeled Water

scholarly journals Misreporting of Energy Intake in the Elderly Using Doubly Labeled Water to Measure Total Energy Expenditure and Weight Change

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danit R Shahar ◽  
Binbing Yu ◽  
Denise K Houston ◽  
Stephen B Kritchevsky ◽  
Anne B Newman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Total Energy ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Weight Change ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Total Energy Expenditure ◽  
Doubly Labeled Water

scholarly journals Cavity ring‐down spectrometer for total energy expenditure using doubly‐labeled water

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Richman ◽  
Dale A. Schoeller ◽  
Tom Thorsen ◽  
Tim Shriver ◽  
Eric R. Crosson
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Total Energy ◽  
Total Energy Expenditure ◽  
Doubly Labeled Water ◽  
Cavity Ring Down

scholarly journals Validation of energy intake by 24-hour multiple pass recall: comparison with total energy expenditure in children aged 5–7 years

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 671-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette Montgomery ◽  
John J. Reilly ◽  
Diane M. Jackson ◽  
Louise A. Kelly ◽  
Christine Slater ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Total Energy ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
School Children ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Total Energy Expenditure ◽  
Doubly Labelled Water ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Multiple Pass ◽  
The Individual

Accurate measurement of energy intake (EI) is essential in studies of energy balance in all age groups. Reported values for EI can be validated against total energy expenditure (TEE) measured using doubly labelled water (DLW). Our previous work has indicated that the use of the standardized 24 h multiple pass recall (24 h MPR) method produces slight overestimates of EI in pre-school children which are inaccurate at individual level but acceptable at group level. To extend this work, the current study validated EI by 24 h MPR against TEE by DLW in sixty-three (thirty-two boys) school-aged children (median age 6 years). In both boys and girls, reported EI was higher than TEE, although this difference was only significant in the girls (median difference 420 kJ/d, P=0·05). On analysis of agreement between TEE and EI, the group bias was an overestimation of EI by 250 kJ/d with wide limits of agreement (−2880, 2380 kJ/d). EI was over-reported relative to TEE by 7 % and 0·9 % in girls and boys, respectively. The bias in the current study was lower than in our previous study of pre-school children, suggesting that estimates of EI become less inaccurate as children age. However, the current study suggests that the 24 h MPR is inaccurate at the individual level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document