scholarly journals N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) –based score can predict in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Ting Huang ◽  
Yuan-Teng Tseng ◽  
Tung-Wei Chu ◽  
John Chen ◽  
Min-Yu Lai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Ventilator Support ◽  
Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Serum N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) testing is recommended in the patients with heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that NT-pro-BNP, in combination with other clinical factors in terms of a novel NT-pro BNP-based score, may provide even better predictive power for in-hospital mortality among patients with HF. A retrospective study enrolled adult patients with hospitalization-requiring HF who fulfilled the predefined criteria during the period from January 2011 to December 2013. We proposed a novel scoring system consisting of several independent predictors including NT-pro-BNP for predicting in-hospital mortality, and then compared the prognosis-predictive power of the novel NT-pro BNP-based score with other prognosis-predictive scores. A total of 269 patients were enrolled in the current study. Factors such as “serum NT-pro-BNP level above 8100 mg/dl,” “age above 79 years,” “without taking angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker,” “without taking beta-blocker,” “without taking loop diuretics,” “with mechanical ventilator support,” “with non-invasive ventilator support,” “with vasopressors use,” and “experience of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation” were found as independent predictors. A novel NT-pro BNP-based score composed of these risk factors was proposed with excellent predictability for in-hospital mortality. The proposed novel NT-pro BNP-based score was extremely effective in predicting in-hospital mortality in HF patients.

Abstract 343: Trends and Predictors of Use of Angiotensin Receptor Blocker and Neprilysin Inhibitor in Patients With Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya Shore ◽  
Tanima Basu ◽  
Neil Kamdar ◽  
Patrick Brady ◽  
Scott L Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Objective: Current guidelines recommend use of combination therapy with angiotensin receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) (i.e., Entresto ® ) in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction as a class 1 recommendation. Contemporary data on real-world use of these agents is lacking. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of individuals enrolled in Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. We included all individuals ≥ 18 years, with two outpatient encounters or one inpatient encounter with a principal ICD 10 diagnosis for HFand 6 months of continuous enrollment. To further identify patients with reduced ejection fraction, we only included individuals who received prescriptions for beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/ angiotensin receptor blockers. Comorbidities were identified using Elixhauser comorbidity index.. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of ARNI use. Results: A total of 154,777 patients were included in our cohort. Overall, 5,834 patients (3.8%) received an ARNI prescription. Use of ARNI increased from 1.4% in 2016 to 3.9% in 2018 (p<0.01). Compared to patients receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, patients receiving ARNI were younger (mean age 69.4 ± 11.1 vs. 72.9 ± 11.0 years;), more likely to be male (69.3% vs. 54.4%) and have commercial insurance (22.1% vs. 16.7%) with a higher comorbidity burden. Predictors of ARNI use after multivariable adjustment included age<65 years (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.3-1.5), Male sex (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.7 - 1.9) and black race (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1 - 1.2). Other predictors of ARNI use are shown in Figure 1. Patients receiving care through a cardiologist compared to a primary care physician were more likely to receive an ARNI (OR 1.8; 95% 1.7 - 1.9). Out of pocket cost for ARNI ranged from $0 to $1006 per month (median $44; IQR $9-$60). Conclusion: Rates of ARNI use remain low among patients with heart failure with racial and gender disparities. Heart Failure patients receiving care with a cardiologist were more likely to receive ARNI. Out of pocket cost for this medication remains high and may be a significant barrier to its use.

scholarly journals The Predictivity of N-Terminal Pro b-Type Natriuretic Peptide for All-Cause Mortality in Various Follow-Up Periods among Heart Failure Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Yu Lai ◽  
Wei-Chih Kan ◽  
Ya-Ting Huang ◽  
John Chen ◽  
Chih-Chung Shiao
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Plasma Level ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Tool ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Initial Plasma ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is an excellent prognostic–predictive tool in heart failure (HF) patients, but its plasma level changes following therapy. The comparison of prognosis–predictivity of a single measurement of plasma NT-pro BNP in different follow-up periods in acute HF patients has been less studied. This study aimed to evaluate whether the association between initial plasma NT-proBNP levels and all-cause mortality would decrease along with an increased follow-up period in patients with acute HF. The retrospective study was carried out, enrolling adult patients with hospitalization-requiring acute HF who fulfilled the predefined criteria from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013. We evaluated the independent predictors of 12-month mortality, and subsequently compared the predictivity of NT-proBNP level at initial presentation for 1-, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month mortality. In total, 269 patients (mean age, 74.45 ± 13.59 years; female, 53.9%) were enrolled. The independent predictors of 12-month mortality included higher “Charlson Comorbidity Index” (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10–1.34), increased “age” (aHR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04–1.10), “administration of vasopressor” (aHR = 3.43; 95% CI, 1.76–6.71), “underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation” (aHR = 4.59; 95% CI, 1.76–6.71), and without “angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker” (aHR = 0.41; 95% CI, 1.86–11.31) (all p <0.001). “Plasma NT-pro BNP level ≧11,755 ng/L” was demonstrated as an independent predictor in 1-month (aHR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.10–5.11; p = 0.028) and 3-month mortality (aHR = 1.98; 95% CI, 1.02–3.86; p = 0.045) but not in more extended follow-up. The outcome predictivity of plasma NT-proBNP levels diminished in a longer follow-up period in hospitalized acute HF patients. In conclusion, these findings remind physicians to act with caution when using a single plasma level of NT-proBNP to predict patient outcomes with a longer follow-up period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document