Colorimetric determination of hydrogen peroxide by morphological decomposition of silver nanoprisms coupled with chromaticity analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (24) ◽  
pp. 9816-9824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kritchapon Nitinaivinij ◽  
Tewarak Parnklang ◽  
Chuchaat Thammacharoen ◽  
Sanong Ekgasit ◽  
Kanet Wongravee

Highly sensitive and accurate detection of hydrogen peroxide using starch-stabilized silver nanoprisms (AgNPrs) combined with image color analysis is proposed. The H2O2 concentration at 1.57 μM can be recognized by naked-eye observation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chutiparn LERTVACHIRAPAIBOON ◽  
Takuya MARUYAMA ◽  
Akira BABA ◽  
Sanong EKGASIT ◽  
Kazunari SHINBO ◽  
...  

1939 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 502-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Peters ◽  
Majel M. MacMasters ◽  
Chester L. French

1991 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K Christians ◽  
Thomas G Aspelund ◽  
Scott V Brayton ◽  
Larry L Roberts

Abstract Seven laboratories participated In a collaborative study of a method for determination of phosphorus in meat and meat products. Samples are digested In sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide; digestion Is complete In approximately 10 mln. Phosphorus Is determined by colorimetric analysis of a dilute aliquot of the sample digest. The collaborators analyzed 3 sets of blind duplicate samples from each of 6 classes of meat (U.S. Department of Agriculture classifications): smoked ham, water-added ham, canned ham, pork sausage, cooked sausage, and hamburger. The calibration curve was linear over the range of standard solutions prepared (phosphorus levels from 0.05 to 1.00%); levels in the collaborative study samples ranged from 0.10 to 0.30%. Standard deviations for repeatability (sr) and reproducibility (sR) ranged from 0.004 to 0.012 and 0.007 to 0.014, respectively. Corresponding relative standard deviations (RSDr and RSDR, respectively) ranged from 1.70 to 7.28% and 3.50 to 9.87%. Six laboratories analyzed samples by both the proposed method and AOAC method 24.016 (14th Ed.). One laboratory reported results by the proposed method only. Statistical evaluations Indicated no significant difference between the 2 methods. The method has been adopted official first action by AOAC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document