Dietary meat, endogenous nitrosation and colorectal cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1355-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.G.C. Kuhnle ◽  
S.A. Bingham
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Nitroso Compounds ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Nitroso Compound ◽  
White Meat ◽  
Total N ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Endogenous Formation ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in developed countries such as the U.K., but incidence rates around the world vary approx. 20-fold. Diet is thought to be a key factor determining risk: red and processed meat, but not white meat or fish, are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. The endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds is a possible explanation because red and processed meat, but not white meat or fish, cause a dose-dependent increase in faecal ATNCs (apparent total N-nitroso compounds) and the formation of nitroso-compound-specific DNA adducts in humans. Red meat is particularly rich in haem which has been found to promote the endogenous formation of ATNC. Nitrosyl haem and nitroso thiols have been identified as major constituents of both faecal and ileal ATNC with a significant increase in the formation of these compounds following a diet rich in red meat. In vitro incubations show that, under simulated gastric conditions, nitroso thiols are the main species of nitroso compound formed, suggesting that acid-catalysed thionitrosation is the initial step in the endogenous formation of nitroso compounds. Nitrosyl haem and other nitroso compounds can then form under the alkaline and reductive conditions of the small and large bowel.

scholarly journals Towards refining WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations for red and processed meat intake: Insights from Alberta’s Tomorrow Project cohort

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-38
Author(s):  
Ala Al Rajabi ◽  
Geraldine Lo Siou ◽  
Alianu K. Akawung ◽  
Kathryn L McDonald ◽  
Tiffany R. Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Prevention ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Carcinogenic Effect ◽  
Meat Intake ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Red Meats ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

ABSTRACT Current cancer prevention recommendations advise limiting red meat intake to <500g/week and avoiding consumption of processed meat, but do not differentiate the source of processed meat. We examined the associations of processed meat derived from red vs. non-red meats with cancer risk in a prospective cohort of 26,218 adults who reported dietary intake using the Canadian Diet History Questionnaire. Incidence of cancer was obtained through data linkage with Alberta Cancer Registry with median (IQR) follow-up of 13.3 (5.1) years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were adjusted for covariates and stratified by age and gender. The median (IQR) consumption (g/week) of red meat, processed meat from red meat and processed meat from non-red meat were 267.9 (269.9), 53.6 (83.3), and 11.9 (31.8), respectively. High intakes (4th Quartile) of processed meat from red meat was associated with increased risk of gastro-intestinal cancer Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) (95% CI): 1.68 (1.09 – 2.57) and colorectal cancers AHR (95% CI): 1.90 (1.12 – 3.22), respectively in women. No statistically significant associations were observed for intakes of red meat or processed meat from non-red meat. Results suggests that the carcinogenic effect associated with processed meat intake may be limited to processed meat derived from red meats. The findings provide preliminary evidence toward refining cancer prevention recommendations for red and processed meat intake.

scholarly journals Meat intake and cancer risk: prospective analyses in UK Biobank

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anika Knuppel ◽  
Keren Papier ◽  
Georgina K. Fensom ◽  
Paul N. Appleby ◽  
Julie A. Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Meat Consumption ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Meat Intake ◽  
Incidence Trends ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

AbstractBackgroundRed and processed meat has been consistently associated with risk for colorectal cancer, but evidence for other cancer sites is limited and few studies have examined the association between poultry intake and cancer risk. We examined associations between total meat, red meat, processed meat and poultry intake and incidence for 20 common cancer sites.Methods and FindingsWe analysed data from 475,023 participants (54% women) in UK Biobank. Participants were aged 37-73 years and cancer free at baseline. Information on meat consumption was based on a touchscreen questionnaire completed at baseline covering type and frequency of meat intake. Diet intake was re-measured a minimum of three times in a subsample (15%) using a web-based 24h dietary recall questionnaire. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between baseline meat intake and cancer incidence. Trends in risk across baseline meat intake categories were calculated by assigning a mean value to each category using estimates from the re-measured meat intakes. During a mean follow-up of 6.9 years, 28,955 participants were diagnosed with a malignant cancer. Total, red and processed meat intakes were each positively associated with risk of colorectal cancer (e.g. hazard ratio (HR) per 70 g/day higher intake of red and processed meat combined 1.31, 95%-confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.52).Red meat intake was positively associated with breast cancer (HR per 50 g/day higher intake 1.12, 1.01-1.24) and prostate cancer (1.15, 1.03-1.29). Poultry intake was positively associated with risk for cancers of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues (HR per 30g/day higher intake 1.16, 1.03-1.32). Only the associations with colorectal cancer were robust to Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Study limitations include unrepresentativeness of the study sample for the UK population, low case numbers for less common cancers and the possibility of residual confounding.ConclusionsHigher intakes of red and processed meat were associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer. The observed positive associations of red meat consumption with breast and prostate cancer, and poultry intake with cancers of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues, require further investigation.

scholarly journals Diet and colorectal cancer in UK Biobank: a prospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 246-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E Bradbury ◽  
Neil Murphy ◽  
Timothy J Key
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Dietary Factors ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Dietary Intakes ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Breakfast Cereals ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

Abstract Background Most of the previous studies on diet and colorectal cancer were based on diets consumed during the 1990s. Methods We used Cox-regression models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios for colorectal cancer by dietary factors in the UK Biobank study. Men and women aged 40–69 years at recruitment (2006–10) reported their diet on a short food-frequency questionnaire (n = 475 581). Dietary intakes were re-measured in a large sub-sample (n = 175 402) who completed an online 24-hour dietary assessment during follow-up. Trends in risk across the baseline categories were calculated by assigning re-measured intakes to allow for measurement error and changes in intake over time. Results During an average of 5.7 years of follow-up, 2609 cases of colorectal cancer occurred. Participants who reported consuming an average of 76 g/day of red and processed meat compared with 21 g/day had a 20% [95% confidence interval (CI): 4–37] higher risk of colorectal cancer. Participants in the highest fifth of intake of fibre from bread and breakfast cereals had a 14% (95% CI: 2–24) lower risk of colorectal cancer. Alcohol was associated with an 8% (95% CI: 4–12) higher risk per 10 g/day higher intake. Fish, poultry, cheese, fruit, vegetables, tea and coffee were not associated with colorectal-cancer risk. Conclusions Consumption of red and processed meat at an average level of 76 g/d that meets the current UK government recommendation (≤90 g/day) was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Alcohol was also associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer, whereas fibre from bread and breakfast cereals was associated with a reduced risk.

scholarly journals Meat intake and cancer risk: prospective analyses in UK Biobank

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1540-1552
Author(s):  
Anika Knuppel ◽  
Keren Papier ◽  
Georgina K Fensom ◽  
Paul N Appleby ◽  
Julie A Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Multiple Testing ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Risk ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Meat Intake ◽  
Incidence Trends ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

Abstract Background Red and processed meat have been consistently associated with colorectal cancer risk, but evidence for other cancer sites and for poultry intake is limited. We therefore examined associations between total, red and processed meat and poultry intake and incidence for 20 common cancers. Methods We analyzed data from 474 996 participants (54% women) in UK Biobank. Participants were aged 37–73 years and cancer-free at baseline (2006–10). Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine associations between baseline meat intake and cancer incidence. Trends in risk across the baseline categories were calculated, assigning re-measured intakes from a subsample. Results During a mean follow-up of 6.9 years, 28 955 participants were diagnosed with malignant cancer. After correction for multiple testing, red and processed meat combined, and processed meat, were each positively associated with colorectal cancer risk [hazard ratio (HR) per 70 g/day higher intake of red and processed meat 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.14–1.53; HR per 20 g/day higher intake of processed meat 1.18, 1.03–1.31] and red meat was associated with colon cancer risk (HR per 50 g/day higher intake of red meat 1.36, 1.13–1.64). Positive associations of red meat intake with colorectal and prostate cancer, processed meat intake with rectal cancer and poultry intake with cancers of the lymphatic and haematopoietic tissues did not survive multiple testing. Conclusions Higher intake of red and processed meat was specifically associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer; there was little evidence that meat intake was associated with risk of other cancers.

scholarly journals Association between red meat consumption and colon cancer: A systematic review of experimental results

2017 ◽  
Vol 242 (8) ◽  
pp. 813-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy D Turner ◽  
Shannon K Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Meat Consumption ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Risk ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Processed Meats ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

A role for red and processed meat in the development of colorectal cancer has been proposed based largely on evidence from observational studies in humans, especially in those populations consuming a westernized diet. Determination of causation specifically by red or processed meat is contingent upon identification of plausible mechanisms that lead to colorectal cancer. We conducted a systematic review of the available evidence to determine the availability of plausible mechanistic data linking red and processed meat consumption to colorectal cancer risk. Forty studies using animal models or cell cultures met specified inclusion criteria, most of which were designed to examine the role of heme iron or heterocyclic amines in relation to colon carcinogenesis. Most studies used levels of meat or meat components well in excess of those found in human diets. Although many of the experiments used semi-purified diets designed to mimic the nutrient loads in current westernized diets, most did not include potential biologically active protective compounds present in whole foods. Because of these limitations in the existing literature, there is currently insufficient evidence to confirm a mechanistic link between the intake of red meat as part of a healthy dietary pattern and colorectal cancer risk. Impact statement Current recommendations to reduce colon cancer include the reduction or elimination of red or processed meats. These recommendations are based on data from epidemiological studies conducted among cultures where meat consumption is elevated and consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are reduced. This review evaluated experimental data exploring the putative mechanisms whereby red or processed meats may contribute to colon cancer. Most studies used levels of meat or meat-derived compounds that were in excess of those in human diets, even in cultures where meat intake is elevated. Experiments where protective dietary compounds were used to mitigate the extreme levels of meat and meat-derived compounds showed protection against colon cancer, with some essentially negating the impact of meat in the diet. It is essential that better-designed studies be conducted that use relevant concentrations of meat or meat-derived compounds in complex diets representative of the foods consumed by humans.

scholarly journals Meat intake and cancer risk: prospective analyses in UK Biobank

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anika Knuppel ◽  
Keren Papier ◽  
Paul N. Appleby ◽  
Timothy J. Key ◽  
Aurora Perez-Cornago
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Meat Consumption ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Meat Intake ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

AbstractIntroductionMeat intake is thought to play a role in the risk of cancer. The Third Expert Report of the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research concluded that red meat was a probable cause and processed meat a convincing cause of colorectal cancer. However, evidence for associations between red and processed meat intake and other cancer sites is limited. Furthermore, few studies have investigated the association between poultry intake and cancer risk. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the associations between red, processed meat and poultry intake and incidence for 20 common cancer sites.Material and methodsWe analysed data from 475,264 participants (54 % women) in UK Biobank. Participants were aged 37–73 years and cancer free at baseline. Cancer diagnosis and death due to cancer without prior diagnosis during follow-up were determined using data-linkage with cancer and death registries (with follow-up until 31 March 2016 for England and Wales and until 31 October 2015 for Scotland, respectively). Information on meat consumption was based on a touchscreen questionnaire completed at baseline covering type and frequency of meat intake. We used multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to determine the association between baseline meat intake and cancer incidence. Analyses of lung cancer risk were restricted to never smokers. All analyses were adjusted for socio-demographic, lifestyle and women-specific factors.ResultsOver a mean 6.9 (SD 1.3) years of follow-up, 28,431 participants were diagnosed with any type of cancer. Red meat intake was positively associated with risk for colorectal cancer (n cases = 3,164; Hazard ratio (HR) per 50 g/day higher intake 1.22, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.05–1.41), breast cancer (n cases = 5,536; 1.12, 1.01–1.24) and prostate cancer (n cases = 5,807; 1.16, 1.03–1.30). Processed meat intake was positively associated with risk for colorectal cancer (n cases = 3,189; HR per 20 g/day higher intake 1.17, 95% CI 1.06–1.30). Poultry intake was positively associated with risk for cancers of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues (n cases = 2,431; HR per 30g/day increment in intake 1.16, 95%-CI 1.03, 1.32).DiscussionIn summary, higher intakes of red and processed meat were associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer. Red meat consumption was also positively associated with risk of breast and prostate cancer, but these associations are not supported by most previous prospective studies. The positive association of poultry intake with cancers of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues requires further investigation.

scholarly journals Dietary Intake of Red Meat, Processed Meat, and Poultry and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and All-Cause Mortality in the Context of Dietary Guideline Compliance

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Heddie Mejborn ◽  
Sanne Pagh Møller ◽  
Lau Caspar Thygesen ◽  
Anja Biltoft-Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Dietary Quality ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Activity Data ◽  
Meat Intake ◽  
Dietary Guideline ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

Meat intake has been linked to increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and mortality. However, diet composition may affect the risks. We aimed to estimate associations between red and processed meat and poultry intake and risk of CRC and all-cause mortality and if they are modified by dietary quality using Cox regression analyses. Baseline dietary data were obtained from three survey rounds of the Danish National Survey on Diet and Physical Activity. Data on CRC and all-cause mortality were extracted from national registers. The cohort was followed from date of survey interview—or for CRC, from age 50 years, whichever came last, until 31 December 2017. Meat intake was analysed categorically and continuously, and stratified by dietary quality for 15–75-year-old Danes at baseline, n 6282 for CRC and n 9848 for mortality analyses. We found no significant association between red and processed meat intake and CRC risk. For poultry, increased CRC risk for high versus low intake (HR 1.62; 95%CI 1.13–2.31) was found, but not when examining risk change per 100 g increased intake. We showed no association between meat intake and all-cause mortality. The association between meat intake and CRC or mortality risk was not modified by dietary quality.

scholarly journals Meat consumption and risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke: results from the UK Biobank

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keren Papier ◽  
Georgina Fensom ◽  
Anika Knuppel ◽  
Timothy Key ◽  
Aurora Perez-Cornago
Keyword(s):  
Meat Consumption ◽  
Haemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Meat Intake ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Total Meat ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

AbstractIntroductionMeat consumption may be associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, but the evidence remains inconclusive. We prospectively examined the association between meat (total meat, red and processed meat, red meat, processed meat and poultry) intake and risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke, including ischemic and haemorrhagic subtypes, in a large British cohort.Materials and methodsData were from UK Biobank participants who were free of IHD, stroke and cancer at recruitment (2006–2010), with available information on meat intake in the baseline touchscreen survey, and linked hospital admissions and death data for IHD, stroke, and stroke subtypes over follow-up (n = 441,700). We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to assess associations between meat consumption and risk of IHD, total stroke and ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke subtypes.ResultsOver a mean of 8.1 years of follow-up, 13,590 incident cases of IHD, 5,441 cases of total stroke, 2,258, cases of ischaemic stroke, and 949 cases of haemorrhagic stroke occurred. The risk of IHD was positively associated with intakes of total meat (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.09, 1.27 per 100 g/day higher intake), red and processed meat (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.08, 1.24 per 70 g/day higher intake), red meat (HR = 1.15, 95%, CI 1.07–1.24 per 50 g/day higher intake), processed meat (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.05, 1.16 per 20 g/day higher intake), and poultry (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.01, 1.13 per 30 g/day higher intake). The risk of total stroke was positively associated with intakes of total meat (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.02–1.29 per 100 g/day higher intake) and red and processed meat (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.27 per 70 g/day higher intake). Meat intake was not associated with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke.DiscussionThis large prospective study found that any meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of IHD and that red and processed meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of total stroke. Our findings for IHD and total stroke in relation to red and processed meat are in line with previous studies but our positive findings for poultry and IHD and null findings for red meat and ischaemic stroke are not, thus warranting further study.

scholarly journals A Prospective Analysis of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Incidence in the Black Women's Health Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 288-288
Author(s):  
Ioanna Yiannakou ◽  
Lauren E. Barber ◽  
Shanshan Sheehy ◽  
Julie R. Palmer ◽  
Lynn Rosenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
African American ◽  
African American Women ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Processed Meat ◽  
Meat Intake ◽  
Processed Meats ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Red Meat Intake ◽  
Red And Processed Meat

Abstract Objectives African Americans have the highest incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) of any racial/ethnic group in the US. High intake of red and processed meats has been shown to increase CRC risk in populations of European ancestry, but evidence in African American populations is limited. The association between saturated and monounsaturated fatty acid intakes, the primary types of fat in red and processed meat, and CRC is inconclusive. Thus, we prospectively assessed the intake of red and processed meats and dietary saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids in relation to CRC risk, utilizing the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS, 1995–2018). Methods Dietary data were derived from validated food frequency questionnaires completed in 1995 and 2001 by 52,695 BWHS participants. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for energy, fiber, and discretionary fat. Results Over a median follow-up of 22 years, 564 women developed incident CRC. Total red meat intake was associated with a 25% increased risk of CRC per 100 g/day (HR = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.94–1.66), which was primarily due to intake of unprocessed red meat (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.05–1.70). Processed meat and total saturated and monounsaturated fatty acid intakes were not associated with an increased risk of CRC. Conclusions Unprocessed red meat intake was associated with an increased risk of CRC in this cohort of African American women. The strong evidence, now including African American women, that red meat plays a role in the etiology of CRC suggests opportunities for prevention. Funding Sources This research was funded by National Institutes of Health grants U01 CA164974 and R01 CA058420, the Karin Grunebaum Cancer Research Foundation, and the Boston University Peter Paul Career Development Professorship.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document