A Prospective Analysis of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Incidence in the Black Women's Health Study

Abstract Objectives African Americans have the highest incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) of any racial/ethnic group in the US. High intake of red and processed meats has been shown to increase CRC risk in populations of European ancestry, but evidence in African American populations is limited. The association between saturated and monounsaturated fatty acid intakes, the primary types of fat in red and processed meat, and CRC is inconclusive. Thus, we prospectively assessed the intake of red and processed meats and dietary saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids in relation to CRC risk, utilizing the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS, 1995–2018). Methods Dietary data were derived from validated food frequency questionnaires completed in 1995 and 2001 by 52,695 BWHS participants. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for energy, fiber, and discretionary fat. Results Over a median follow-up of 22 years, 564 women developed incident CRC. Total red meat intake was associated with a 25% increased risk of CRC per 100 g/day (HR = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.94–1.66), which was primarily due to intake of unprocessed red meat (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.05–1.70). Processed meat and total saturated and monounsaturated fatty acid intakes were not associated with an increased risk of CRC. Conclusions Unprocessed red meat intake was associated with an increased risk of CRC in this cohort of African American women. The strong evidence, now including African American women, that red meat plays a role in the etiology of CRC suggests opportunities for prevention. Funding Sources This research was funded by National Institutes of Health grants U01 CA164974 and R01 CA058420, the Karin Grunebaum Cancer Research Foundation, and the Boston University Peter Paul Career Development Professorship.

Download Full-text

Towards refining WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations for red and processed meat intake: Insights from Alberta’s Tomorrow Project cohort

British Journal Of Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s0007114521001240 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-38

Author(s):

Ala Al Rajabi ◽

Geraldine Lo Siou ◽

Alianu K. Akawung ◽

Kathryn L McDonald ◽

Tiffany R. Price ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Prevention ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Red Meat ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Processed Meat ◽

Carcinogenic Effect ◽

Meat Intake ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Red Meats ◽

Red And Processed Meat

ABSTRACT Current cancer prevention recommendations advise limiting red meat intake to <500g/week and avoiding consumption of processed meat, but do not differentiate the source of processed meat. We examined the associations of processed meat derived from red vs. non-red meats with cancer risk in a prospective cohort of 26,218 adults who reported dietary intake using the Canadian Diet History Questionnaire. Incidence of cancer was obtained through data linkage with Alberta Cancer Registry with median (IQR) follow-up of 13.3 (5.1) years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were adjusted for covariates and stratified by age and gender. The median (IQR) consumption (g/week) of red meat, processed meat from red meat and processed meat from non-red meat were 267.9 (269.9), 53.6 (83.3), and 11.9 (31.8), respectively. High intakes (4th Quartile) of processed meat from red meat was associated with increased risk of gastro-intestinal cancer Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) (95% CI): 1.68 (1.09 – 2.57) and colorectal cancers AHR (95% CI): 1.90 (1.12 – 3.22), respectively in women. No statistically significant associations were observed for intakes of red meat or processed meat from non-red meat. Results suggests that the carcinogenic effect associated with processed meat intake may be limited to processed meat derived from red meats. The findings provide preliminary evidence toward refining cancer prevention recommendations for red and processed meat intake.

Download Full-text

Variation in Red Meat Categories Meaningfully Influences Red Meat Intake Estimates of the U.S. Population Aged 2 + Years

Current Developments in Nutrition ◽

10.1093/cdn/nzab053_064 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. 1071-1071

Author(s):

Lauren O'Connor ◽

Kirsten Herrick ◽

Ruth Parsons ◽

Jill Reedy

Keyword(s):

Red Meat ◽

Dietary Guidelines ◽

Processed Meat ◽

Pairwise Comparisons ◽

Eating Patterns ◽

Meat Intake ◽

Lean Meat ◽

Red Meat Intake ◽

The U.S ◽

Red And Processed Meat

Abstract Objectives Limitations in dietary assessment methodology lead to broad and inconsistent red meat intake categories. For example, red meat is often combined with processed meat, which includes processed poultry. Our objective was to quantitatively assess how these limitations influence red meat intake estimates of the U.S. population. Methods Three distinct red meat categories were identified from a series of systematic literature reviews. By systematically disaggregating and reaggregating meat variables (lean meat oz-eq) from the USDA's Food Pattern Equivalents Database, the following categories were created: 1) ‘unprocessed red meat’, 2) ‘total red meat’ [unprocessed red meat + processed red meat], and 3) ‘mixed red and processed meat’ [unprocessed red meat + total processed meat which includes processed poultry]. The 2015–16 and 2017–18 cycles of NHANES (n = 15,039) were combined to estimate and compare mean intakes across these three categories as well as the proportion of the population that exceeded age- and sex-specific red meat allotments in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommended eating patterns for those aged 2 + years. The two-part correlated model of the NCI Usual Intake method in SAS was used. Estimates were adjusted for age, sex, race, and ethnicity and pairwise comparisons were made across categories; P < 0.05. Results Mean intake estimates (lean meat oz-eq/day) differed by red meat category (pairwise comparisons P < 0.00,001): 1.5 ± 0.04 for unprocessed red meat, 2.2 ± 0.05 for total red meat, 2.4 ± 0.05 for mixed red and processed meat. The % of the population exceeding their respective age-sex red meat allotment in the DGA eating patterns also differed by category (pairwise comparisons P < 0.00,001): 18.3 ± 1.9% for unprocessed red meat, 45.1 ± 1.8% for total red meat, 55.2 ± 1.8% for mixed red and processed meat. Conclusions Our results emphasize the importance of accurate and transparent red meat categories in nutrition epidemiology when estimating population intakes. Future research should examine how differences in these intake categories can influence associations between red meat intake and chronic disease. Funding Sources Not applicable.

Download Full-text

A metabolomic study of red and processed meat intake and acylcarnitine concentrations in human urine and blood

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition ◽

10.1093/ajcn/nqaa140 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 112 (2) ◽

pp. 381-388

Author(s):

Roland Wedekind ◽

Agneta Kiss ◽

Pekka Keski-Rahkonen ◽

Vivian Viallon ◽

Joseph A Rothwell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intervention Study ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Red Meat ◽

Processed Meat ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Meat Intake ◽

Red Meat Intake ◽

Red And Processed Meat

ABSTRACT Background Acylcarnitines (ACs) play a major role in fatty acid metabolism and are potential markers of metabolic dysfunction with higher blood concentrations reported in obese and diabetic individuals. Diet, and in particular red and processed meat intake, has been shown to influence AC concentrations but data on the effect of meat consumption on AC concentrations is limited. Objectives To investigate the effect of red and processed meat intake on AC concentrations in plasma and urine using a randomized controlled trial with replication in an observational cohort. Methods In the randomized crossover trial, 12 volunteers successively consumed 2 different diets containing either pork or tofu for 3 d each. A panel of 44 ACs including several oxidized ACs was analyzed by LC-MS in plasma and urine samples collected after the 3-d period. ACs that were associated with pork intake were then measured in urine (n = 474) and serum samples (n = 451) from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) study and tested for associations with habitual red and processed meat intake derived from dietary questionnaires. Results In urine samples from the intervention study, pork intake was positively associated with concentrations of 18 short- and medium-chain ACs. Eleven of these were also positively associated with habitual red and processed meat intake in the EPIC cross-sectional study. In blood, C18:0 was positively associated with red meat intake in both the intervention study (q = 0.004, Student's t-test) and the cross-sectional study (q = 0.033, linear regression). Conclusions AC concentrations in urine and blood were associated with red meat intake in both a highly controlled intervention study and in subjects of a cross-sectional study. Our data on the role of meat intake on this important pathway of fatty acid and energy metabolism may help understanding the role of red meat consumption in the etiology of some chronic diseases. This trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03354130.

Download Full-text

Meat consumption and risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke: results from the UK Biobank

Proceedings of The Nutrition Society ◽

10.1017/s0029665120004024 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽

Author(s):

Keren Papier ◽

Georgina Fensom ◽

Anika Knuppel ◽

Timothy Key ◽

Aurora Perez-Cornago

Keyword(s):

Meat Consumption ◽

Haemorrhagic Stroke ◽

Red Meat ◽

Processed Meat ◽

Uk Biobank ◽

Meat Intake ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Total Meat ◽

Red And Processed Meat

AbstractIntroductionMeat consumption may be associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, but the evidence remains inconclusive. We prospectively examined the association between meat (total meat, red and processed meat, red meat, processed meat and poultry) intake and risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke, including ischemic and haemorrhagic subtypes, in a large British cohort.Materials and methodsData were from UK Biobank participants who were free of IHD, stroke and cancer at recruitment (2006–2010), with available information on meat intake in the baseline touchscreen survey, and linked hospital admissions and death data for IHD, stroke, and stroke subtypes over follow-up (n = 441,700). We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to assess associations between meat consumption and risk of IHD, total stroke and ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke subtypes.ResultsOver a mean of 8.1 years of follow-up, 13,590 incident cases of IHD, 5,441 cases of total stroke, 2,258, cases of ischaemic stroke, and 949 cases of haemorrhagic stroke occurred. The risk of IHD was positively associated with intakes of total meat (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.09, 1.27 per 100 g/day higher intake), red and processed meat (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.08, 1.24 per 70 g/day higher intake), red meat (HR = 1.15, 95%, CI 1.07–1.24 per 50 g/day higher intake), processed meat (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.05, 1.16 per 20 g/day higher intake), and poultry (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.01, 1.13 per 30 g/day higher intake). The risk of total stroke was positively associated with intakes of total meat (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.02–1.29 per 100 g/day higher intake) and red and processed meat (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.27 per 70 g/day higher intake). Meat intake was not associated with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke.DiscussionThis large prospective study found that any meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of IHD and that red and processed meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of total stroke. Our findings for IHD and total stroke in relation to red and processed meat are in line with previous studies but our positive findings for poultry and IHD and null findings for red meat and ischaemic stroke are not, thus warranting further study.

Download Full-text

Meat intake, meat cooking methods, and meat-derived mutagen exposure and risk of sessile serrated lesions

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition ◽

10.1093/ajcn/nqaa030 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 111 (6) ◽

pp. 1244-1251 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Dominique Mosley ◽

Timothy Su ◽

Harvey J Murff ◽

Walter E Smalley ◽

Reid M Ness ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mutagenic Activity ◽

Colorectal Neoplasia ◽

Colorectal Polyp ◽

Red Meat ◽

Cooking Methods ◽

Processed Meat ◽

Meat Intake ◽

Logistic Regression Models ◽

Meat Cooking ◽

Increased Risk

Abstract Background Red and processed meat, recognized carcinogens, are risk factors for colorectal neoplasia, including polyps, the precursor for colorectal cancer. The mechanism is unclear. One possible explanation is the mutagenic activity of these foods, perhaps due to generation during cooking [e.g., heterocyclic amine (HCA) intake]. Few studies have evaluated meat intake and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) risk, a recently recognized precursor, and no study has evaluated meat cooking methods and meat-derived mutagens with SSL risk. Objective We evaluated intakes of meat, meat cooking methods, and inferred meat mutagens with SSL risk and in comparison to risk of other polyps. Methods Meat, well-done meat, and inferred meat mutagen intakes were evaluated. Polytomous logistic regression models were used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs among cases (556 hyperplastic polyp, 1753 adenoma, and 208 SSL) and controls (3804) in the large colonoscopy-based, case-control study, the Tennessee Colorectal Polyp Study. Results The highest quartile intakes of red meat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.44, 3.93), processed meat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.30, 3.17), well-done red meat (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.34, 3.60), and the HCA 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQX; OR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.49, 4.16) were associated with increased risk of SSLs in comparison to the lowest quartile intake. Conclusions High intakes of red and processed meats are strongly and especially associated with SSL risk and part of the association may be due to HCA intake. Future studies should evaluate other mechanism(s) and the potential for primary prevention.

Download Full-text

Meat intake and cancer risk: prospective analyses in UK Biobank

10.1101/19003822 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Anika Knuppel ◽

Keren Papier ◽

Georgina K. Fensom ◽

Paul N. Appleby ◽

Julie A. Schmidt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Meat Consumption ◽

Red Meat ◽

Processed Meat ◽

Uk Biobank ◽

Meat Intake ◽

Incidence Trends ◽

Red And Processed Meat

AbstractBackgroundRed and processed meat has been consistently associated with risk for colorectal cancer, but evidence for other cancer sites is limited and few studies have examined the association between poultry intake and cancer risk. We examined associations between total meat, red meat, processed meat and poultry intake and incidence for 20 common cancer sites.Methods and FindingsWe analysed data from 475,023 participants (54% women) in UK Biobank. Participants were aged 37-73 years and cancer free at baseline. Information on meat consumption was based on a touchscreen questionnaire completed at baseline covering type and frequency of meat intake. Diet intake was re-measured a minimum of three times in a subsample (15%) using a web-based 24h dietary recall questionnaire. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between baseline meat intake and cancer incidence. Trends in risk across baseline meat intake categories were calculated by assigning a mean value to each category using estimates from the re-measured meat intakes. During a mean follow-up of 6.9 years, 28,955 participants were diagnosed with a malignant cancer. Total, red and processed meat intakes were each positively associated with risk of colorectal cancer (e.g. hazard ratio (HR) per 70 g/day higher intake of red and processed meat combined 1.31, 95%-confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.52).Red meat intake was positively associated with breast cancer (HR per 50 g/day higher intake 1.12, 1.01-1.24) and prostate cancer (1.15, 1.03-1.29). Poultry intake was positively associated with risk for cancers of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues (HR per 30g/day higher intake 1.16, 1.03-1.32). Only the associations with colorectal cancer were robust to Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Study limitations include unrepresentativeness of the study sample for the UK population, low case numbers for less common cancers and the possibility of residual confounding.ConclusionsHigher intakes of red and processed meat were associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer. The observed positive associations of red meat consumption with breast and prostate cancer, and poultry intake with cancers of the lymphatic and hematopoietic tissues, require further investigation.

Download Full-text

Background Diet Influences TMAO Concentrations Associated with Red Meat Intake without Influencing Apparent Hepatic TMAO-Related Activity in a Porcine Model

Metabolites ◽

10.3390/metabo10020057 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 57 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Rebekka Thøgersen ◽

Martin Krøyer Rasmussen ◽

Ulrik K. Sundekilde ◽

Sophie A. Goethals ◽

Thomas Van Hecke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mrna Expression ◽

Red Meat ◽

Processed Meat ◽

Related Activity ◽

Cvd Risk ◽

Meat Intake ◽

Expression Of Genes ◽

Background Diet ◽

The Impact ◽

Red And Processed Meat

Red meat has been associated with an increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, possibly through gut microbial-derived trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO). However, previous reports are conflicting, and influences from the background diet may modulate the impact of meat consumption. This study investigated the effect of red and white meat intake combined with two different background diets on urinary TMAO concentration and its association with the colon microbiome in addition to apparent hepatic TMAO-related activity. For 4 weeks, 32 pigs were fed chicken or red and processed meat combined with a prudent or western background diet. 1H NMR-based metabolomics analysis was conducted on urine samples and hepatic Mrna expression of TMAO-related genes determined. Lower urinary TMAO concentrations were observed after intake of red and processed meat when consumed with a prudent compared to a western background diet. In addition, correlation analyses between urinary TMAO concentrations and relative abundance of colon bacterial groups suggested an association between TMAO and specific bacterial taxa. Diet did not affect the hepatic Mrna expression of genes related to TMAO formation. The results suggest that meat-induced TMAO formation is regulated by mechanisms other than alterations at the hepatic gene expression level, possibly involving modulations of the gut microbiota.

Download Full-text

Bringing The Bacon Bome To Bath Class

Mathematics Teacher ◽

10.5951/mathteacher.111.5.0326 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 111 (5) ◽

pp. 326-327

Keyword(s):

World Health ◽

Processed Meat ◽

Daily Lives ◽

Processed Meats ◽

Increased Risk ◽

The Media ◽

The Many ◽

The One ◽

Health Organization ◽

Red And Processed Meat

As readers might recall, two years ago there was buzz in the air concerning a report about processed meats and cancer. News outlets pounced on the possibility of including bacon and cancer in the same sentence, and as a mathematics teacher, I pounced on the opportunity to discuss risk with students. In pursuit of engaging students with items that they might encounter or hear about in their daily lives and having a little extra time to discuss the notion of modeling and assumptions, I had students read in class one of the many news articles that discussed the topic. The one I chose, from Allison Aubrey of NPR, noted that there was a “16 percent increased risk of colorectal cancer associated with each 3.5 ounces of red and processed meat consumed per day” (Aubrey 2015). Aubrey had obtained the information from the World Health Organization (2015) report that initially started the media flurry.

Download Full-text

High Consumption of Red Meat Is Associated with Excess Mortality Among African-American Women

Journal of Nutrition ◽

10.1093/jn/nxaa282 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 150 (12) ◽

pp. 3249-3258

Author(s):

Shanshan Sheehy ◽

Julie R Palmer ◽

Lynn Rosenberg

Keyword(s):

African American Women ◽

Cardiovascular Mortality ◽

Excess Mortality ◽

Meat Consumption ◽

Red Meat ◽

Dietary Factors ◽

Health Study ◽

High Consumption ◽

Increased Risk ◽

All Cause Mortality

ABSTRACT Background Red meat is a rich source of nutrients but is typically high in saturated fats. Carcinogenic chemicals can be formed during cooking and processing. Little is known about the relation of red meat consumption to mortality in African Americans (AAs), a group with excess mortality and high consumption of red meat relative to whites. Objective Our objective was to assess the association between red meat consumption and mortality in AA women. Methods The Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) is a prospective cohort study of AA women across the USA who completed health questionnaires at enrollment in 1995 (median age 38 y, median BMI 27.9 kg/m2) and every 2 y thereafter. The analyses included 56,314 women who completed a validated FFQ and were free of cardiovascular disease and cancer at baseline in 1995. Exposures were total red meat, processed red meat, and unprocessed red meat consumption. Outcomes were all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Cox proportional hazards models with control for age, socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, medical history, and dietary factors were used to estimate HRs with 95% CIs. Results During 22 y of follow-up through to 2017, we identified 5054 deaths, which included 1354 cardiovascular deaths and 1801 cancer deaths. The HR for all-cause mortality was 1.47 (95% CI: 1.33, 1.62) for the highest quintile of total red meat consumption relative to the lowest. Each 1 serving/d increase in red meat consumption was associated with a 7% (95% CI: 5%, 9%) increased risk of all-cause mortality. Red meat consumption was also associated with increased cardiovascular mortality, but not with cancer mortality. Results were similar for the consumption of processed and unprocessed red meat. Conclusions Red meat consumption is associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among AA women.

Download Full-text