Novel phase-corrected horn antenna of short length

1988 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 292
Author(s):  
O.W. Ata ◽  
T.M. Benson
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 1642-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingran He ◽  
Ning Ding ◽  
Lingfei Zhang ◽  
Wenjing Zhang ◽  
Biao Du

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-54
Author(s):  
Qurotul Aini ◽  
Siti Ria Zuliana ◽  
Nuke Puji Lestari Santoso

The scale is usually used to check and determine the value of a qualitative factor in quantitative measures. The measurement scale is a management in agreement that is used as a reference to determine the short length of the interval that is in the measuring instrument, so that the measuring instrument when used in measurements will produce quantitative data. The results of the scale management calculation must be interpreted carefully because in addition to producing a rough picture, the respondent's answers are not just straightforward to be trusted. Types of measurement scales: Likert scale, Guttman scale, semantic differential scale, rating scale, Thurstone scale, Borgadus scale, and various other measurement management scales. One of the most difficult jobs for information technology researchers faced with the necessity of measuring variables is: finding directions in the midst of many existing sizes. If there is a good size for a particular variable, it seems that there are not many reasons to compile a new size yourself. Keywords: Scale, Measurement, Variables.


2020 ◽  
Vol 140 (12) ◽  
pp. 601-602
Author(s):  
Gen Kawakami ◽  
Ken Kawamata ◽  
Shinobu Ishigami ◽  
Takeshi Ishida ◽  
Katsushige Harima ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 115-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yang ◽  
Lianghao Guo ◽  
Qing Zhou ◽  
Zhe Wu ◽  
Haibo Jiang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110114
Author(s):  
Andrew Nyce ◽  
Snehal Gandhi ◽  
Brian Freeze ◽  
Joshua Bosire ◽  
Terry Ricca ◽  
...  

Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse patient experience in patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). However, it is unclear which component of the waiting times is most impactful to the patient experience and the impact on hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of ED patients between July 2018 and March 30, 2020. In all, 3278 patients were included: 1477 patients were discharged from the ED, and 1680 were admitted. Discharged patients had a longer door-to-first provider and door-to-doctor time, but a shorter doctor-to-disposition, disposition-to-departure, and total ED time when compared to admitted patients. Some, but not all, components of waiting times were significantly higher in patients with suboptimal experience (<100th percentile). Prolonged door-to-doctor time was significantly associated with worse patient experience in discharged patients and in patients with hospital length of stay ≤4 days. Prolonged ED waiting times were significantly associated with worse patient experience in patients who were discharged from the ED and in inpatients with short length of stay. Door-to-doctor time seems to have the highest impact on the patient’s experience of these 2 groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document