scholarly journals Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Central Opening Masonry Infill under Lateral Reversed Cyclic Loading.

2019 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 05009
Author(s):  
Maidiawati ◽  
Jafril Tanjung ◽  
Yulia Hayatfi ◽  
Hamdeni Medriosa
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Brick Masonry ◽  
Lateral Loading ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Clay Brick ◽  
Seismic Behaviour ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Central Opening ◽  
Lateral Strength ◽  
Reversed Cyclic

This paper will describe the seismic behaviour of masonry infilled RC frame with a central opening structure under reversed cyclic lateral loading. To achieve the purpose of this study, four 1/4-scale single story and single bay RC frame specimens were tested, i.e. one bare frame, one clay brick masonry infilled RC frame without opening and two clay brick masonry infills with a central opening in infills. The ratios of opening size to panel area were 25% and 40%. Through reversed cyclic lateral loading tests, the seismic performance of RC frames with a central opening brick masonry infills was investigated. As the results, significant distinctions of failure mechanism, lateral strength, stiffness, and ductility were observed between these specimens. In the case of infills with a central opening, the cracks sprouted and developed at the corners of the opening. Although the presence of the opening in infill reduces the lateral strength and stiffness overall structure, the brick infilled frames with a central opening of 25% and 40% of panel area show better seismic performance as compared to the bare frame.

scholarly journals Seismic performance of brick masonry infilled frame structures with bed joint reinforcements

2020 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 03004
Author(s):  
Maidiawati ◽  
Jafril Tanjung ◽  
Yulia Hayati ◽  
Agus ◽  
Satria Rangga
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Frame Structure ◽  
Frame Structures ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Infilled Frame ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Lateral Strength ◽  
Plane Direction ◽  
Infilled Rc Frames ◽  
Reversed Cyclic

This paper presents the evaluation of the seismic performance of brick infilled RC frame structures with bed joint reinforcements based on reversed cyclic lateral load tests. Three specimens of the structural model of 1/4 scale-down single-story single-bay brick infilled RC frame was prepared, which were brick infilled RC frames with and without bed joint reinforcements. Two specimens of brick infills with bed joint reinforcements were different in the spacing of bed joint rebars. The specimens were tested by applying a reversed cyclic lateral loading in-plane direction. During the tests, the crack propagation was observed at the peak and residual drifts of each loading cycle to recognize the failure mechanisms of the specimens. As the results, although the use of the bed joint reinforcements ineffective to increase the lateral strength of the overall infilled frame structure. The rebars in mortar bed joints role to sustain the lateral strength in plastic deformation, and provide the whole structure with high ductility. It seemed that the rebars in mortar bed joints confined the brick infills. Therefore, the infilled RC frames can survive in large deformation without failure of the infills in out of the plane direction.

scholarly journals Cyclic behavior of the R/C frames with reinforced masonry infills

2020 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 05014
Author(s):  
Jafril Tanjung ◽  
Maidiawati
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Brick Masonry ◽  
Frame Structure ◽  
Cyclic Behavior ◽  
Cyclic Loads ◽  
Seismic Capacity ◽  
Masonry Infill ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Experimental Works ◽  
Reversed Cyclic

This study focuses on the experimental works to define the behavior of the reinforced concrete (R/C) frame model with the strengthening of the brick masonry infill by using the embedded reinforcement bars subjected to lateral reversed cyclic loads. A previous study by applying the lateral monotonic static loads showed that the embedded reinforcement bars increased the lateral capacity of the R/C frame and also delayed the failure of the brick masonry infill and R/C frame structure as well. However, in order to define its seismic capacity, a lateral reversed cyclic loading is required. The experimental works in this study were conducted by preparing and testing the 1/4 scaled-down R/C frame specimens represented the first story of the middle multi-story commonly constructed in the earthquake-prone area such as West Sumatera, Indonesia. The R/C frame specimens were two R/C frames with brick masonry infills where one of them strengthened by the embedded reinforced bars. All specimens were tested for applying the lateral reversed cyclic loads. The applied lateral load, the lateral displacement, the progressive cracks, and the failure mode of the specimens were observed and recorded during experimental works. As it was expected, the presence of the embedded reinforced bars in the brick masonry infills increases the seismic capacity and stiffness of the R/C specimens and also delayed the failure of the specimens. The experimental results in this study imply the simple strengthening method for the brick masonry infills.

scholarly journals Effects of Single and Multi Openings in Brick Infills on the Seismic Response of Infilled RC Frames

2018 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 01036
Author(s):  
Maidiawati ◽  
Jafril Tanjung ◽  
Hamdeni Medriosa ◽  
Yulia Hayati
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Dissipated Energy ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Infilled Frames ◽  
Masonry Infill ◽  
Infilled Frame ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Central Opening ◽  
Lateral Strength ◽  
Infilled Rc Frames

Many researchers have performed a lot of studies of the seismic behavior reinforced concrete (RC) frame with masonry infill. They found that masonry infill affects the lateral strength, stiffness and ductility performance of the RC frame structures. However, when openings appeared in the panel infill for door and windows, the responses of the overall structure are entirely changed. The primary purpose of this study is to experimentally investigate the behavior of brick infilled RC frames possessing single opening and two openings. Four specimens of 1/4-scale single bay RC frames with brick infills were made that were one bare frame, one frame with full infill and two frames with infills having a central opening and two openings with the opening ratio of 25%. The specimens were tested under lateral reversed cyclic loads. Consequently, different responses of failure mechanism, lateral strength, stiffness and energy dissipated were observed among the specimens. The brick full infill failed in shear with propagation cracks in central part of the panel, but in the case of the infills with single and two openings, the cracks were dominated at the corners of the openings. The in-plane strength, stiffness and dissipated energy of infilled frames decreased when openings appeared in the panel. However, the seismic performance of brick infilled frame with the opening of 25% of panel area is better than those of bare frame. The brick infilled frames with a central opening and two openings are similar in lateral strength and dissipated energy. It seems that area and position of the openings control the seismic response to the overall infilled frame structure of the openings

Lateral Load Behavior of an Open-Ground-Story RC Building with AAC Infills in Upper Stories

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 1653-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supratik Bose ◽  
Durgesh C. Rai
Keyword(s):  
Brick Masonry ◽  
Hysteretic Behavior ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Rc Frame ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Open Ground ◽  
Strength And Stiffness ◽  
Infilled Rc Frames ◽  
Masonry Infilled Rc Frames

Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry infills in upper stories can be beneficial for improving the seismic response of open-ground-story (OGS), reinforced concrete (RC)–frame buildings. Two reduced 1:2.5-scale models of single-story, single-bay RC frames with and without AAC infill masonry were tested for resistance properties and hysteretic behavior. Low strength and stiffness of AAC masonry, about half of the conventional brick masonry, led to improved load sharing between the infill and the frame, which helped an early development of frame yield mechanism for enhanced energy dissipation. Test results were used to evaluate the reliability of using existing strength and stiffness relations of conventional masonry infilled RC frames for AAC infilled frames. Analytical models were developed to predict the observed hysteretic behavior of tested specimens. Nonlinear analyses of a five-story, four-bay OGS-RC frame were performed for conventional brick masonry infills and relatively softer and weaker AAC infills in upper stories. The results indicated that the undesirable effect of weak/soft ground story mechanism of OGS-RC frames can be reduced to an acceptable level by using AAC infills in upper stories.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document