89 Effect of Oral Sodium Bicarbonate on Calcium-Phosphate Nephrolithiasis Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the BASE Pilot Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 594
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i34-i36
Author(s):  
M D Witham ◽  
M Band ◽  
H Chong ◽  
P T Donnan ◽  
G Hampson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Oral sodium bicarbonate is often used to treat metabolic acidosis in older people with advanced chronic kidney disease, but evidence is lacking on whether this provides a net gain in health or quality of life. Methods We conducted a multicentre, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Adults aged 60 years and over with category 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease, not on dialysis, with serum bicarbonate concentrations <22 mmol/L were recruited from 27 UK centres. Participants were randomised 1:1 to oral sodium bicarbonate or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the Short Physical Performance Battery at 12 months, adjusted for baseline. Other key outcome measures included generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life, anthropometry, physical performance, renal function, adverse events including commencement of renal replacement therapy, and health economic analysis. Results We randomised 300 participants, mean age 74 years; 86 (29%) were female. Mean baseline estimated GFR was 19 ml/min/1.73m2. Study medication adherence was 73% in both groups. No significant treatment effect was evident for the primary outcome of the between-group difference in the Short Physical Performance Battery at 12 months (-0.4 points; 95% CI -0.9 to 0.1, p=0.15). No significant treatment benefit was seen for any of the secondary outcomes. Adverse events were more frequent in the bicarbonate arm (457 versus 400). Time to commencing renal replacement therapy was similar in both groups (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.02, p=0.43). Health economic analysis showed lower quality of life and higher costs in the bicarbonate arm at one year (£1234 vs £807); placebo dominated bicarbonate under all sensitivity analyses for incremental cost-effectiveness. Conclusions Oral sodium bicarbonate did not improve a wide range of health measures in this trial, and is unlikely to be cost-effective for use in the UK NHS in this patient group.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikaru Morooka ◽  
Junichiro Yamamoto ◽  
Akihito Tanaka ◽  
Daijo Inaguma ◽  
Shoichi Maruyama

Abstract Background Patients with chronic kidney disease often experience metabolic acidosis. Whether oral sodium bicarbonate can reduce mortality in patients with metabolic acidosis has been debated for years. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the utility of sodium bicarbonate in patients who will undergo dialysis therapy. In this study, we investigated the effect of oral sodium bicarbonate therapy on mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) initiated on dialysis therapy. Methods We conducted an observational study of patients when they started dialysis therapy. There were 17 centres participating in the Aichi Cohort Study of Prognosis in Patients Newly Initiated into Dialysis. Data were available on patients’ sex, age, use of sodium bicarbonate, drug history, medical history, vital data, and laboratory data. We investigated whether patients on oral sodium bicarbonate for more than three months before dialysis initiation had a better prognosis than those without sodium bicarbonate therapy. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality. Results The study included 1524 patients with chronic kidney disease who initiated dialysis between October 2011 and September 2013. Among them, 1030 were men and 492 women, with a mean age of 67.5 ± 13.1 years. Of these, 677 used sodium bicarbonate and 845 did not; 13.6% of the patients in the former group and 21.2% of those in the latter group died by March 2015 (p <  0.001). Even after adjusting for various factors, the use of sodium bicarbonate independently reduced mortality (p <  0.001). Conclusions The use of oral sodium bicarbonate at the time of dialysis initiation significantly reduced all-cause mortality in patients undergoing dialysis therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (27) ◽  
pp. 1-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miles D Witham ◽  
Margaret Band ◽  
Huey Chong ◽  
Peter T Donnan ◽  
Geeta Hampson ◽  
...  

Background Advanced chronic kidney disease is common in older people and is frequently accompanied by metabolic acidosis. Oral sodium bicarbonate is used to treat this acidosis, but evidence is lacking on whether or not this provides a net gain in health or quality of life for older people. Objectives The objectives were to determine whether or not oral bicarbonate therapy improves physical function, quality of life, markers of renal function, bone turnover and vascular health compared with placebo in older people with chronic kidney disease and mild acidosis; to assess the safety of oral bicarbonate; and to establish whether or not oral bicarbonate therapy is cost-effective in this setting. Design A parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Setting The setting was nephrology and geriatric medicine outpatient departments in 27 UK hospitals. Participants Participants were adults aged ≥ 60 years with advanced chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate category 4 or 5, not on dialysis) with a serum bicarbonate concentration of < 22 mmol/l. Interventions Eligible participants were randomised 1 : 1 to oral sodium bicarbonate or matching placebo. Dosing started at 500 mg three times daily, increasing to 1 g three times daily if the serum bicarbonate concentration was < 22 mmol/l at 3 months. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the Short Physical Performance Battery score at 12 months, adjusted for baseline. Other outcome measures included generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life, anthropometry, 6-minute walk speed, grip strength, renal function, markers of bone turnover, blood pressure and brain natriuretic peptide. All adverse events were recorded, including commencement of renal replacement therapy. For the health economic analysis, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year was the main outcome. Results In total, 300 participants were randomised, 152 to bicarbonate and 148 to placebo. The mean age of participants was 74 years and 86 (29%) were female. Adherence to study medication was 73% in both groups. A total of 220 (73%) participants were assessed at the 12-month visit. No significant treatment effect was evident for the primary outcome of the between-group difference in the Short Physical Performance Battery score at 12 months (–0.4 points, 95% confidence interval –0.9 to 0.1 points; p = 0.15). No significant treatment benefit was seen for any of the secondary outcomes. Adverse events were more frequent in the bicarbonate arm (457 vs. 400). Time to commencement of renal replacement therapy was similar in both groups (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 2.02; p = 0.43). Health economic analysis showed higher costs and lower quality of life in the bicarbonate arm at 1 year, with additional costs of £564 (95% confidence interval £88 to £1154) and a quality-adjusted life-year difference of –0.05 (95% confidence interval –0.08 to –0.01); placebo dominated bicarbonate under all sensitivity analyses for incremental cost-effectiveness. Limitations The trial population was predominantly white and male, limiting generalisability. The increment in serum bicarbonate concentrations achieved was small and a benefit from larger doses of bicarbonate cannot be excluded. Conclusions Oral sodium bicarbonate did not improve a range of health measures in people aged ≥ 60 years with chronic kidney disease category 4 or 5 and mild acidosis, and is unlikely to be cost-effective for use in the NHS in this patient group. Once other current trials of bicarbonate therapy in chronic kidney disease are complete, an individual participant meta-analysis would be helpful to determine which subgroups, if any, are more likely to benefit and which treatment regimens are more beneficial. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN09486651 and EudraCT 2011-005271-16. The systematic review is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018112908. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 27. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikaru Morooka ◽  
Junichiro Yamamoto ◽  
Akihito Tanaka ◽  
Daijo Inaguma ◽  
Shoichi Maruyama

Abstract Background Patients with chronic kidney disease often experience metabolic acidosis. Whether oral sodium bicarbonate can reduce mortality in patients with metabolic acidosis has been debated for years. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the utility of sodium bicarbonate in patients who will undergo dialysis therapy. In this study, we investigated the effect of oral sodium bicarbonate therapy on mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) initiated on dialysis therapy. Methods We conducted an observational study of patients when they started dialysis therapy. There were 17 centres participating in the Aichi Cohort Study of Prognosis in Patients Newly Initiated into Dialysis. Data were available on patients’ sex, age, use of sodium bicarbonate, drug history, medical history, vital data, and laboratory data. We investigated whether patients on oral sodium bicarbonate for more than three months before dialysis initiation had a better prognosis than those without sodium bicarbonate therapy. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality. Results The study included 1524 patients with chronic kidney disease who initiated dialysis between October 2011 and September 2013. Among them, 1030 were men and 492 women, with a mean age of 67.5 ± 13.1 years. Of these, 677 used sodium bicarbonate and 845 did not; 13.6% of the patients in the former group and 21.2% of those in the latter group died by March 2015 (p < 0.001). Even after adjusting for various factors, the use of sodium bicarbonate independently reduced mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusions The use of oral sodium bicarbonate at the time of dialysis initiation significantly reduced all-cause mortality in patients undergoing dialysis therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Gaggl ◽  
Alexandra Repitz ◽  
Sonja Riesenhuber ◽  
Christof Aigner ◽  
Christopher Sliber ◽  
...  

Background: Sodium bicarbonate supplementation is a mainstay in the treatment of metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recent studies showed reduction of progression of CKD and reduced all-cause mortality. However, additional sodium loading could worsen arterial hypertension, a well-known contributor to progression of CKD. This patient-relevant and economically negative side effect is under-studied in prospective studies up until now.Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of sodium bicarbonate treatment on arterial blood pressure at baseline and after 8 weeks.Methods: The SoBic study is an ongoing randomized controlled trial, in which patients with CKD receive either a high dose of oral sodium bicarbonate or a rescue treatment, if necessary. We used standardized office blood pressure and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24h-ABPM). Regression models were adjusted for estimated glomerular filtration rate and change of antihypertensives.Results: 47 subjects were enrolled and the mean age was 57 (±14.6) years and 18 (38%) were female. In 43 randomized subjects with sufficiently performed 24h-ABPM neither systolic 24h-ABPM (2.522; 95%CI: −2.364, 7.408; mmHg) nor diastolic 24h-ABPM (0.868; 95%CI: −2.411, 4.147; mmHg) was affected by study group allocation. When looking at the effect of individual sodium bicarbonate dose on 24h-ABPM, the fully adjusted model suggested an increase of 0.047 (95%CI: −0.026, 0.119) mmHg by each mg/kg per day increase of sodium bicarbonate dose.Conclusion: Sodium bicarbonate supplementation over 8 weeks did not significantly increase blood pressure measured by 24h-ABPM in CKD patients.Trial Registration: EUDRACT Number: 2012-001824-36; 12/07/2012 (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document