P092 COMPARISON OF INFLIXIMAB AND ADALIMUMAB CONCENTRATIONS BETWEEN THE ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY AND THE HOMOGENEOUS MOBILITY SHIFT ASSAY (HMSA) IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: AN UPDATE FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES FOR THE HMSA

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. S112-S113
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Papamichail ◽  
William Clarke ◽  
Niels VandeCasteele ◽  
Katharine Germansky ◽  
Joseph Feuerstein ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. e143-e145 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T Clarke ◽  
Konstantinos Papamichael ◽  
Niels Vande Casteele ◽  
Katharine A Germansky ◽  
Joseph D Feuerstein ◽  
...  

This prospective observational study including consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with either infliximab or adalimumab showed that although the correlation between the ELISA and the homogeneous mobility shift assay was good for both drugs, the agreement was poor.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S69-S69
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Papamichail ◽  
William Clarke ◽  
Niels VandeCasteele ◽  
Katharine Germansky ◽  
Joseph Feuerstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims We previously showed a discrepancy between a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the homogenous mobility shift assay (HMSA) for both infliximab and adalimumab concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).1 Based also on the results of this study, Prometheus Laboratories initiated a comprehensive review of their HMSA assays and found that there was an upward drift for both infliximab and adalimumab over a 2-year period, including when our study was being performed. Prometheus corrected the errant values and reported the revised drug concentrations to physicians. We aimed to compare these two assays following the implementation of these corrective measures. Methods Samples from patients with IBD either on infliximab or adalimumab maintenance therapy were prospectively evaluated using both ELISA (InformTx™, Inform Diagnostics) (for research purposes) and the HMSA (ANSER™, Prometheus Laboratories) (performed clinically). Comparison of drug concentrations between assays was performed as previously described.1 Results In total 74 samples were analysed (infliximab, n=45; adalimumab, n=29). Drug concentrations (median [interquartile range, IQR]) were still significantly higher when measured by the HMSA compared to ELISA for foth infliximab (9 [7.1–12.4] vs. 5.7 [4.8–9] μg/ml; p<0.001, respectively) and adalimumab (12.9 [10.3–16.9] vs. 10.6 [8.6–14] μg/ml; p=0.036, respectively). The correlation of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations between assays is depicted in Figure 1. Agreement between assays was moderate [ICC: 0.658; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.080 to 0.892; p<0.001] for infliximab and strong (ICC = 0.826, 95%CI: -0.066 to 0.949, p<0.001) for adalimumab. A Bland–Altman plot of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations to compare the two assays is shown in Figure 2. Qualitative agreement in drug concentration status (therapeutic or sub-therapeutic) was only minimal between assays using >5 μg/ml (K = 0.299, p=0.005), >7 μg/ml (K = 0.303, p=0.005) or >10 μg/ml (K = 0.323, p=0.003) as therapeutic drug concentrations for infliximab, while for adalimumab was weak using >10 μg/ml as therapeutic drug concentrations (K = 0.437, p=0.004), although overall agreement using either >5 or >7 μg/ml as therapeutic drug concentrations was 97%. Conclusions These data suggest that although the correlation between the ELISA and the HMSA was very good for both infliximab and adalimumab it is difficult to compare absolute drug concentrations. Until commercial assays are properly cross-validated and standardized, assay-dependent drug concentration thresholds may need to be applied to better interpret therapeutic drug monitoring results and it is advisable that patients are monitored with the same assay. 1Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 Sep 27. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izz202. [Epub ahead of print]


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 963-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan C Ungaro ◽  
Andres Yarur ◽  
Jacqueline Jossen ◽  
Becky L Phan ◽  
Ezra Chefitz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Vedolizumab is an anti-α4β7 biologic approved for ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn’s disease [CD]. We aimed to examine the association of maintenance vedolizumab concentrations with remission. Methods We performed a cross-sectional multi-centre study of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients on maintenance vedolizumab. A homogeneous mobility shift assay [HMSA] was used to determine trough serum concentrations of vedolizumab and anti-drug antibodies [ATVs]. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission defined as a composite of clinical remission, normalized C-reactive protein [CRP] and no corticosteroid use in 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included corticosteroid-free endoscopic and deep remission. Vedolizumab concentrations were compared between patients in remission and with active disease. Logistic regression, adjusting for confounders, assessed the association between concentrations and remission. Results In total, 258 IBD patients were included [55% CD and 45% UC]. Patients in clinical and biochemical remission had significantly higher vedolizumab concentrations [12.7 µg/mL vs 10.1 µg/mL, p = 0.002]. Concentrations were also higher among patients in endoscopic and deep remission [14.2 µg/mL vs 8.5 µg/mL, p = 0.003 and 14.8 µg/mL vs 10.1 µg/mL, p = 0.01, respectively]. After controlling for potential confounders, IBD patients with vedolizumab concentrations >11.5 µg/mL were nearly 2.4 times more likely to be in corticosteroid-free clinical and biochemical remission. Only 1.6% of patients had ATVs. Conclusions In a large real-world cohort of vedolizumab maintenance concentrations, IBD patients with remission defined by objective measures [CRP and endoscopy] had significantly higher trough vedolizumab concentrations and immunogenicity was uncommon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document