scholarly journals Primary adenocarcinoma arising in esophageal colon interposition for corrosive esophageal injury: a case report and review of the literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (12) ◽  
pp. E1406-E1409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo De Moura ◽  
Igor Ribeiro ◽  
Martin Coronel ◽  
Eduardo De Moura ◽  
Joana Carvalho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Colon interposition for benign strictures is associated with significant perioperative complications that carry high morbidity and mortality. Although rarely reported in the literature, adenocarcinoma can occur as a late complication in an interposed colonic segment. We report a case of a late-stage adenocarcinoma in a colonic interposition performed for benign esophageal stricture.

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
C. Spitali ◽  
K. De Vogelaere ◽  
G. Delvaux

Colon interposition is an established technique for esophageal reconstruction. We describe the case of primary adenocarcinoma arising in a colonic interposition graft that was performed after total esophagectomy for recurrence adenocarcinoma derived from the Barrett esophagus.


2010 ◽  
Vol 252 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mircea Chirica ◽  
Nicolas Veyrie ◽  
Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand ◽  
Sarah Zohar ◽  
Bruno Halimi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasit Mahawongkajit ◽  
Nuttorn Boochangkool

Abstract Background Colonic evaluation is an essential step before proceeding with esophagectomy to reconstruct by colonic interposition. Colonoscopy is the standard practice for colorectal cancer screening, but it has a chance of failing cecal intubation and carries a risk of horrific complication by colonic perforation. CT colonography is a less invasive alternative method that has been reported as useful for colonoscopic screening in cases of average risk of colorectal cancer. This study set out to report our clinical experience and to evaluate CT colonoscopy in the preoperative process for colonic interposition of esophagectomy patients. Methods Data for esophagectomy with colonic interposition patients between March 2016 and December 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Results Nineteen patients were included in this study with 13 in the esophageal cancer group and 6 in the corrosive esophageal injury group. The majority of conduits used ileocolonic graft. After colonic interposition, endoscopy was performed and no lesions of conduits were detected. Conclusion CT colonoscopy is a minimally invasive and reliable colonic evaluation method for the patient of average colorectal cancer risk who has undergone esophagectomy with colonic interposition.


2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (S1) ◽  
pp. 205-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadrien Tranchart ◽  
Mircea Chirica ◽  
Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand ◽  
Emile Sarfati ◽  
Pierre Cattan

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailesh Mohandas ◽  
Stephen Lake

Primary adenocarcinoma is a rare and late complication following proctocolectomy and ileostomy for ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, Crohn's disease and multifocal colorectal cancer. We report a case of adenocarcinoma of the ileostomy occurring 48 years after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. A review of the literature suggests that there are 39 cases reported in literature and this case reports the longest interval between formation of ileostomy and diagnosis of ileostomy adenocarcinoma. This case also reports lymph node metastasis to the adjacent mesenteric lymph node. The incidence of lymphnode metastasis is 15 percent as per literature. Onces diagnosis is confirmed by biopsy enblock excision with or without stomal relocation is the main stay of treatment. Patient education and regular surveillance of patients with long-standing ileostomy is recommended for early detection of this unusual cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 362
Author(s):  
Santiyamadhi Subramanyan ◽  
Komathi Ramachandran ◽  
Ing Ping Tang

The incidence of esophageal impacted denture is proportionately increasing as there is increasing number of people wearing denture in current days. Impacted denture has to be removed as soon as possible because the delay can lead to complications. The successful removal of impacted denture in the esophagus in a patient is reported, with a review of the literature. A 52-year-old Malay lady complained of dysphagia with no history of foreign body ingestion. Following unsuccessful attempts of removal via a rigid esophagoscope, open surgery was performed. Without further delay, the impacted denture was removed by cervical esophagotomy, and the patient recovered uneventfully. Esophageal foreign bodies are usually removed by endoscopy. However, in situations where this appears potentially hazardous, such as with impacted denture, open surgical extraction that is promptly performed is a safer option.International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 05 No. 03 July’21 Page: 362-365


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-69
Author(s):  
Jacek Sobocki ◽  
Marek Jackowski ◽  
Adam Dziki ◽  
Wiesław Tarnowski ◽  
Tomasz Banasiewicz ◽  
...  

Introduction: Gastrointestinal fistula is one of the most difficult problems in gastrointestinal surgery. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality, numerous complications, prolonged hospitalization, and high cost of treatment. </br>Aim: This project aimed to develop recommendations for the treatment of gastrointestinal fistulas, based on evidence-based medicine and best clinical practice to reduce treatment-related mortality and morbidity. </br>Material and methods: The preparation of these recommendations is based on a review of the literature from the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases from 1.01.2010 to 31.12.2020, with particular emphasis on systematic reviews and clinical recommendations of recognized scientific societies. Recommendations in the form of a directive were formulated and assessed using the Delphi method. </br>Results and conclusions: Nine recommendations were presented along with a discussion and comments of experts. Treatment should be managed by a multidisciplinary team (surgeon, anesthetist, clinical nutritionist/dietician, nurse, pharmacist, endoscopist).


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-162
Author(s):  
Álynson Larocca Kulcheski ◽  
Eduardo Teston Bondan ◽  
Xavier Soler I Graells ◽  
Pedro Grein Santoro ◽  
Guilherme S. Moraes ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: Obesity is a public health problem with high morbidity and mortality rates and perioperative complications in the general population. Minimally invasive procedures are promising alternatives to perioperative complications in individuals with a high body mass index (BMI). Endoscopic lumbar discectomy has been gaining popularity in this regard. However, there are few descriptions in the literature about the endoscopic approach to improve pain and quality of life in obese individuals. Likewise, it is not determined whether individuals with a high BMI have more complications in this type of surgical approach. Methods: A longitudinal retrospective case-control study was performed with 63 subjects submitted to endoscopic discectomy, divided into 2 groups according to BMI (Group A, BMI ≥ 30kg/m2 and Group B, BMI <30kg/m2), in order to compare improvement in quality of life through the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and pain improvement by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), as well as to observe the incidence of postoperative complications in both groups. Results: There was no difference in postoperative ODI (p=0.36) and VAS (p=0.54) between groups, nor was there a statistical difference in the incidence of complications between groups (p=0.56). Conclusions: Endoscopic discectomy brings similar results in pain and quality of life in obese and non-obese patients without causing higher rates of complications. Level of Evidence III; Case-Control Study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document