scholarly journals Endoscopic management of superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffroy Vanbiervliet ◽  
Alan Moss ◽  
Marianna Arvanitakis ◽  
Urban Arnelo ◽  
Torsten Beyna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Duodenal Adenoma ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Strong Recommendation ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Duodenal Adenomas ◽  
Moderate Quality ◽  
Quality Evidence

Main recommendations 1 ESGE recommends that all duodenal adenomas should be considered for endoscopic resection as progression to invasive carcinoma is highly likely.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2 ESGE recommends performance of a colonoscopy, if that has not yet been done, in cases of duodenal adenoma.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3 ESGE recommends the use of the cap-assisted method when the location of the minor and/or major papilla and their relationship to a duodenal adenoma is not clearly established during forward-viewing endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 ESGE recommends the routine use of a side-viewing endoscope when a laterally spreading adenoma with extension to the minor and/or major papilla is suspected.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5 ESGE suggests cold snare polypectomy for small (< 6 mm in size) nonmalignant duodenal adenomas.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6 ESGE recommends endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as the first-line endoscopic resection technique for nonmalignant large nonampullary duodenal adenomas.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7 ESGE recommends that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for duodenal adenomas is an effective resection technique only in expert hands.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8 ESGE recommends using techniques that minimize adverse events such as immediate or delayed bleeding or perforation. These may include piecemeal resection, defect closure techniques, noncontact hemostasis, and other emerging techniques, and these should be considered on a case-by-case basis.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 9 ESGE recommends endoscopic surveillance 3 months after the index treatment. In cases of no recurrence, a further follow-up endoscopy should be done 1 year later. Thereafter, surveillance intervals should be adapted to the lesion site, en bloc resection status, and initial histological result. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

scholarly journals Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffroy Vanbiervliet ◽  
Marin Strijker ◽  
Marianna Arvanitakis ◽  
Arthur Aelvoet ◽  
Urban Arnelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Strong Recommendation ◽  
Moderate Quality ◽  
Endoscopic Papillectomy ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stenting ◽  
Ampullary Tumors ◽  
Quality Evidence

Main Recommendations 1 ESGE recommends against diagnostic/therapeutic papillectomy when adenoma is not proven.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2 ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasound and abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for staging of ampullary tumors.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3 ESGE recommends endoscopic papillectomy in patients with ampullary adenoma without intraductal extension, because of good results regarding outcome (technical and clinical success, morbidity, and recurrence).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 ESGE recommends en bloc resection of ampullary adenomas up to 20–30 mm in diameter to achieve R0 resection, for optimizing the complete resection rate, providing optimal histopathology, and reduction of the recurrence rate after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5 ESGE suggests considering surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas when endoscopic resection is not feasible for technical reasons (e. g. diverticulum, size > 4 cm), and in the case of intraductal involvement (of > 20 mm). Surveillance thereafter is still mandatory.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6 ESGE recommends direct snare resection without submucosal injection for endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7 ESGE recommends prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting to reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 8 ESGE recommends long-term monitoring of patients after endoscopic papillectomy or surgical ampullectomy, based on duodenoscopy with biopsies of the scar and of any abnormal area, within the first 3 months, at 6 and 12 months, and thereafter yearly for at least 5 years.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Resection of Esophageal Granular Cell Tumors: A Single Center Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaipeng Liu ◽  
Yangyang Zhou ◽  
Qingfen Zheng ◽  
Dan Liu ◽  
Huiyu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Muscularis Propria ◽  
Granular Cell ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Clinicopathological Characteristics ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: Granular cell tumors (GCTs) are rare tumors probably originating from neurogenic Schwann cells. The aim was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of endoscopic resection for esophageal GCTs. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed patients with pathologically diagnosed esophageal GCTs in our center from February 2012 to December 2020. Clinicopathological characteristics, endoscopic features and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: 12 males and 10 females were identified. Lesions were located in the upper, middle and lower esophagus in three, six and thirteen cases respectively. 14 lesions (63.6%) exhibited white-to-yellow discoloration. The mean maximum diameter of these lesions was 5.7±2.2 mm (range 2-11.6 mm). The most lesions (91%) were located in the mucosa or submucosa layer, and 2 lesions (9.0%) were in the muscularis propria layer. Endoscopic mucosal resection (n=17), endoscopic submucosal dissection (n=4) and endoscopic submucosal excavation (n=1) were performed. En bloc resection was achieved in 20 lesions (90.9%). The R0 resection was achieved in 20 lesions (90.9%). No patients experienced intraoperative perforation or delayed bleeding in the mean length of postoperative hospital stay of 4.2±2.1 days (range 1-9 days). All patients had no recurrence or metastasis during the mean follow-up period of 48.1±27.2 months (range 2-102 months). Conclusion: Endoscopic resection is safe and effective for management of esophageal GCTs. Clinically, the appropriate approach of endoscopic resection should be selected according to the origin and size of the lesion.

Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal tumors: 10 years’ experience in 18 Japanese high-volume centers

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiko Kato ◽  
Yoji Takeuchi ◽  
Shu Hoteya ◽  
Tsuneo Oyama ◽  
Satoru Nonaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Local Recurrence Rate ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
High Volume ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding

Background and study aim: There is no enough data for endoscopic resection (ER) of superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs) due to its rarity. There are two main kinds of ER techniques for SDETs: EMR and ESD. In addition, modified EMR techniques, underwater EMR (UEMR) and cold polypectomy (CP), are getting popular. We conducted a large-scale retrospective multicenter study to clarify detailed outcomes of duodenal ER. Patients and methods : Patients with SDETs who underwent ER at 18 institutions from January 2008 to December 2018 were included. The rates of en bloc resection and delayed adverse events (AEs) (defined as delayed bleeding or perforation) were analyzed. Local recurrence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In total, 3107 patients (including 1017 receiving ESD) were included. En bloc resection rates were 79.1%, 78.6%, 86.8%, and 94.8%, and delayed AE rates were 0.5%, 2.2%, 2.8%, and 7.3% for CP, UEMR, EMR and ESD, respectively. The delayed AE rate was significantly higher for ESD group than non-ESD group among lesions less than 19 mm (7.4% vs 1.9%, p<0.0001), but not among lesions larger than 20 mm (6.1% vs 7.1%, p=0.6432). The local recurrence rate was significantly lower in ESD group than non-ESD group (p<0.001). Furthermore, for lesions larger than 30 mm, the cumulative local recurrence rate at 2 years was 22.6% in non-ESD group compared to only 1.6% in ESD group (p<0.0001). Conclusions: ER outcomes for SDETs were generally acceptable. ESD by highly experienced endoscopists might be an option for very large SDETs.

scholarly journals Endoscopic tissue sampling – Part 1: Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary tracts. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roos E. Pouw ◽  
Maximilien Barret ◽  
Katharina Biermann ◽  
Raf Bisschops ◽  
László Czakó ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Fine Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Strong Recommendation ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Weak Recommendation ◽  
Moderate Quality ◽  
Quality Evidence

Main Recommendations 1 ESGE recommends that, where there is a suspicion of eosinophilic esophagitis, at least six biopsies should be taken, two to four biopsies from the distal esophagus and two to four biopsies from the proximal esophagus, targeting areas with endoscopic mucosal abnormalities. Distal and proximal biopsies should be placed in separate containers.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 2 ESGE recommends obtaining six biopsies, including from the base and edge of the esophageal ulcers, for histologic analysis in patients with suspected viral esophagitis.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 3 ESGE recommends at least six biopsies are taken in cases of suspected advanced esophageal cancer and suspected advanced gastric cancer.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 4 ESGE recommends taking only one to two targeted biopsies for lesions in the esophagus or stomach that are potentially amenable to endoscopic resection (Paris classification 0-I, 0-II) in order to confirm the diagnosis and not compromise subsequent endoscopic resection.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 5 ESGE recommends obtaining two biopsies from the antrum and two from the corpus in patients with suspected Helicobacter pylori infection and for gastritis staging.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 6 ESGE recommends biopsies from or, if endoscopically resectable, resection of gastric adenomas.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 7 ESGE recommends fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles equally for sampling of solid pancreatic masses.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 8 ESGE suggests performing peroral cholangioscopy (POC) and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition in indeterminate biliary strictures. For proximal and intrinsic strictures, POC is preferred. For distal and extrinsic strictures, EUS-guided sampling is preferred, with POC where this is not diagnostic.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 9 ESGE suggests obtaining possible non-neoplastic biopsies before sampling suspected malignant lesions to prevent intraluminal spread of malignant disease.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 10 ESGE suggests dividing EUS-FNA material into smears (two per pass) and liquid-based cytology (LBC), or the whole of the EUS-FNA material can be processed as LBC, depending on local experience.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.

scholarly journals Comparison of Endoscopic Techniques in the Management of Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Francesco Panzuto ◽  
Ludovica Magi ◽  
Gianluca Esposito ◽  
Maria Rinzivillo ◽  
Bruno Annibale
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Endoscopic Technique ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Type I ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Endoscopic Techniques ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasia

Background. Endoscopic resection is considered the treatment of choice for type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia (gNEN) given its indolent behaviour; however, the favoured endoscopic technique to remove these tumours is not well established. Aims. This systematic review is aimed at investigating the best endoscopic management for type I gNEN. Methods. PubMed Central/Medline and Scopus were systematically searched for records up to August 31, 2020. Results. After screening the 675 retrieved records, 6 studies were selected for the final analysis. The main endoscopic resection techniques described were endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Overall, 112 gNENs were removed by EMR and 77 by ESD. Both techniques showed similar results for complete and en bloc resection (97.4% and 98.7%; 92.3% and 96.3% with ESD and EMR, respectively). ESD was associated with a higher rate of complications than EMR (11.7% vs. 5.4%), but this difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.17 ). The rates of recurrence during follow-up were 18.2% and 11.5% for EMR and ESD, respectively. Conclusions. To date, there are no sufficient data showing superiority of a given endoscopic technique over others. Both ESD and EMR seem to be effective in the management of type I gNEN, with a relatively low rate of recurrence.

scholarly journals Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2021

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (03) ◽  
pp. 300-332
Author(s):  
Ian M. Gralnek ◽  
Adrian J. Stanley ◽  
A. John Morris ◽  
Marine Camus ◽  
James Lau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Dose ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage ◽  
Strong Recommendation ◽  
Epinephrine Injection ◽  
Moderate Quality ◽  
High Quality Evidence ◽  
Mechanical Therapy ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal ◽  
Quality Evidence

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS 1 ESGE recommends in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) the use of the Glasgow–Blatchford Score (GBS) for pre-endoscopy risk stratification. Patients with GBS ≤ 1 are at very low risk of rebleeding, mortality within 30 days, or needing hospital-based intervention and can be safely managed as outpatients with outpatient endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2 ESGE recommends that in patients with acute UGIH who are taking low-dose aspirin as monotherapy for secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis, aspirin should not be interrupted. If for any reason it is interrupted, aspirin should be re-started as soon as possible, preferably within 3–5 days.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3 ESGE recommends that following hemodynamic resuscitation, early (≤ 24 hours) upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy should be performed. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 4 ESGE does not recommend urgent (≤ 12 hours) upper GI endoscopy since as compared to early endoscopy, patient outcomes are not improved. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 5 ESGE recommends for patients with actively bleeding ulcers (FIa, FIb), combination therapy using epinephrine injection plus a second hemostasis modality (contact thermal or mechanical therapy). Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 6 ESGE recommends for patients with an ulcer with a nonbleeding visible vessel (FIIa), contact or noncontact thermal therapy, mechanical therapy, or injection of a sclerosing agent, each as monotherapy or in combination with epinephrine injection. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 7 ESGE suggests that in patients with persistent bleeding refractory to standard hemostasis modalities, the use of a topical hemostatic spray/powder or cap-mounted clip should be considered. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 8 ESGE recommends that for patients with clinical evidence of recurrent peptic ulcer hemorrhage, use of a cap-mounted clip should be considered. In the case of failure of this second attempt at endoscopic hemostasis, transcatheter angiographic embolization (TAE) should be considered. Surgery is indicated when TAE is not locally available or after failed TAE. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 9 ESGE recommends high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for patients who receive endoscopic hemostasis and for patients with FIIb ulcer stigmata (adherent clot) not treated endoscopically. (a) PPI therapy should be administered as an intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion (e. g., 80 mg then 8 mg/hour) for 72 hours post endoscopy. (b) High dose PPI therapies given as intravenous bolus dosing (twice-daily) or in oral formulation (twice-daily) can be considered as alternative regimens.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 10 ESGE recommends that in patients who require ongoing anticoagulation therapy following acute NVUGIH (e. g., peptic ulcer hemorrhage), anticoagulation should be resumed as soon as the bleeding has been controlled, preferably within or soon after 7 days of the bleeding event, based on thromboembolic risk. The rapid onset of action of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS), as compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), must be considered in this context.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

scholarly journals Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Western Center: Analysis of Outcomes and Safety Profile

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
João Santos-Antunes ◽  
Margarida Marques ◽  
Rui Morais ◽  
Fátima Carneiro ◽  
Guilherme Macedo
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Gastrointestinal Lesions

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established endoscopic technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal lesions. Colorectal ESD outcomes are less reported in the Western literature, and Portuguese data are still very scarce. Our aim was to describe our experience on colorectal ESD regarding its outcomes and safety profile. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective evaluation of recorded data on ESDs performed between 2015 and 2020. Only ESDs performed on epithelial neoplastic lesions were selected for further analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of a total of 167 colorectal ESDs, 153 were included. Technical success was achieved in 147 procedures (96%). The lesions were located in the colon (<i>n</i> = 24) and rectum (<i>n</i> = 123). The en bloc resection rate was 92% and 97%, the R0 resection rate was 83% and 82%, and the curative resection rate was 79% and 78% for the colon and the rectum, respectively. The need for a hybrid technique was the only risk factor for piecemeal or R1 resection. We report a perforation rate of 3.4% and a 4.1% rate of delayed bleeding; all the adverse events were manageable endoscopically, without the need of blood transfusions or surgery. Most of the lesions were laterally spreading tumours of the granular mixed type (70%), and 20% of the lesions were malignant (12% submucosal and 8% intramucosal cancer). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our series on colorectal ESD reports a very good efficacy and safety profile. This technique can be applied by endoscopists experienced in ESD.

scholarly journals Anchoring the snare tip is a feasible endoscopic mucosal resection method for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeongseok Kim ◽  
Jisup Kim ◽  
Eun Hye Oh ◽  
Nam Seok Ham ◽  
Sung Wook Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
The Mean

AbstractSmall rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be treated using cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-C), which requires additional effort to apply a dedicated cap and snare. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a simpler modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique, so-called anchored snare-tip EMR (ASEMR), for the treatment of small rectal NETs, comparing it with EMR-C. We retrospectively evaluated 45 ASEMR and 41 EMR-C procedures attempted on small suspected or established rectal NETs between July 2015 and May 2020. The mean (SD) lesion size was 5.4 (2.2) mm and 5.2 (1.7) mm in the ASEMR and EMR-C groups, respectively (p = 0.558). The en bloc resection rates of suspected or established rectal NETs were 95.6% (43/45) and 100%, respectively (p = 0.271). The rates of histologic complete resection of rectal NETs were 94.1% (32/34) and 88.2% (30/34), respectively (p = 0.673). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the ASEMR group than in the EMR-C group (3.12 [1.97] vs. 4.13 [1.59] min, p = 0.024). Delayed bleeding occurred in 6.7% (3/45) and 2.4% (1/41) of patients, respectively (p = 0.618). In conclusion, ASEMR was less time-consuming than EMR-C, and showed similar efficacy and safety profiles. ASEMR is a feasible treatment option for small rectal NETs.

scholarly journals Prevention and Management of Complications and Education in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2511
Author(s):  
Yoshitsugu Misumi ◽  
Kouichi Nonaka
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Educational Methods ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Management Of Complications

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered superior to endoscopic mucosal resection as an endoscopic resection because of its higher en bloc resection rate, but it is more difficult to perform. As ESD techniques have become more common, and the range of treatment by ESD has expanded, the number of possible complications has also increased, and endoscopists need to manage them. In this report, we will review the management of critical complications, such as hemorrhage, perforation, and stenosis, and we will also discuss educational methods for acquiring and improving ESD skills.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document