High Quality of Diabetes Care Based Upon Individualised Treatment Goals – A Cross Sectional Study in 4784 Patients in Germany

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (05) ◽  
pp. 294-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kloos ◽  
N. Müller ◽  
P. Hartmann ◽  
T. Lehmann ◽  
A. Sämann ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 188-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirokazu Tanaka ◽  
Takehiro Sugiyama ◽  
Noriko Ihana-Sugiyama ◽  
Kohjiro Ueki ◽  
Yasuki Kobayashi ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1442-1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Whyte ◽  
C. Penny ◽  
M. Phelan ◽  
J. Hippisley-Cox ◽  
A. Majeed

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al-Shafaee ◽  
Yousuf Al-Farsi ◽  
Yousuf Al-Kaabi ◽  
Yajnavalka Banerjee ◽  
Najat Al-Zadjali ◽  
...  

Objective: To assess the quality of diabetic care provided in primary health care settings in Oman. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of randomly selected 500 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) attending 6 primary care diabetic clinics in the north Al-Batinah region of Oman from January to December 2010. Nine standards on the quality of diabetes care were audited. Results: The mean age of the sample was 51±13 years, ranging from 15 to 87 years; the majority (61%) were females. The mean duration of DM was 4±3 years, ranging from 1 to 18 years. Seventy-seven percent of the patients attended diabetic clinics at least 4 times per year. Of the 9 assessed diabetic standards, HbA1c was documented in 33% of the patients, body mass index in 12%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in 40%, urinary albumin:creatinine ratio in 28%, creatinine in 63% and blood pressure (BP) in 96%. Optimal control among the documented indicators was noted in 32, 21, 25, 85, 95 and 19%, respectively. Twenty percent of the patients had their ECGs done while only 39% of the patients had foot examination. No patient had attained control in all of HbA1c., BP and LDL-C. Conclusion: There is a gap between the recommended DM care guidelines and current practice with consequent poor quality of care in these patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lolemo Kelbiso ◽  
Admasu Belay ◽  
Mirkuzie Woldie

Background. A high quality of work life (QWL) is a crucial issue for health care facilities to have qualified, dedicated, and inspired employees. Among different specialties in health care settings, nurses have a major share among other health care providers. So, they should experience a better QWL to deliver high-quality holistic care to those who need help. Objective. To assess the level of quality of work life and its predictors among nurses working in Hawassa town public health facilities, South Ethiopia. Methods. A facility based cross-sectional study was conducted on 253 nurses of two hospitals and nine health centers. The total sample size was allocated to each facility based on the number of nurses in each facility. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. The interitem consistency of the scale used to measure QWL had Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.86. A multinomial logistic regression model was fitted to identify significant predictors of quality of work life using SPSS version 20. Results. The study showed that 67.2% of the nurses were dissatisfied with the quality of their work life. We found that educational status, monthly income, working unit, and work environment were strong predictors of quality of work life among nurses (p<0.05). Conclusion. Significant proportions of the nurses were dissatisfied with the quality of their work life. The findings in this study and studies reported from elsewhere pinpoint that perception of nurses about the quality of their work life can be modified if health care managers are considerate of the key issues surrounding QWL.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz A. Díaz-Apodaca ◽  
Federico G. de Cosío ◽  
Jaume Canela-Soler ◽  
Rosalba Ruiz-Holguín ◽  
Maria Teresa Cerqueira

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolanta Majer ◽  
Sandra Pyda ◽  
Jerzy Robert Ladny ◽  
Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez ◽  
Lukasz Szarpak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document