Investigations into the Clinical Utility of Latex D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (01) ◽  
pp. 008-011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedric J Carter ◽  
D Lynn Doyle ◽  
Nigel Dawson ◽  
Shauna Fowler ◽  
Dana V Devine
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Fibrin Degradation Product ◽  
Current Form ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryThe serial use of non-invasive tests has been shown to be a safe method of managing outpatients who are suspected of having lower limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Objective testing has shown that the majority of these outpatients do not have venous thrombosis. A rapid test to exclude DVT in these patients, without the need for expensive and inconvenient serial non-invasive vascular testing, would have practical and economic advantages.Studies measuring the fibrin degradation product D-dimer using enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIA) in patients with veno-graphically proven DVT suggest that it should be possible to exclude this condition by the use of one of the rapid latex bead D-dimer tests.We have examined 190 patients with suspected DVT using both a latex and an EIA D-dimer assay. The latex D-dimer test used in this study was negative in 7 of the 36 proven cases of DVT. This sensitivity of only 80% is not sufficient to allow this type of assay, in its current form, to be used as an exclusion test for DVT. The same plasma samples were tested with an EIA assay. This information was used to mathematically model the effects of selecting a range of D-dimer discriminant cut off points for the diagnosis of DVT. These results indicate that 62% of suspected clinically significant DVT could have this diagnosis excluded, with a 98% sensitivity, if the rapid latex or equivalent D-dimer test could be reformulated to measure less than 185 ng/ml of D-dimer.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Use of a Negative D-Dimer and Modified Low Wells Score in Excluding above Knee Deep Venous Thrombosis in an Outpatient Population, Assessing Need for Diagnostic Ultrasound

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Rahiminejad ◽  
Anshul Rastogi ◽  
Shirish Prabhudesai ◽  
David Mcclinton ◽  
Peter MacCallum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Clinical Risk Factor ◽  
Diagnostic Pathway ◽  
Clinical Diagnostic ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Wells Score ◽  
D Dimer

Aims. Colour doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) is widely used in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT); however, the number of scans positive for above knee DVT is low. The present study evaluates the reliability of the D-dimer test combined with a clinical probability score (Wells score) in ruling out an above knee DVT and identifying patients who do not need a CDUS. Materials and Method. This study is a retrospective audit and reaudit of a total of 816 outpatients presenting with suspected lower limb DVT from March 2009 to March 2010 and from September 2011 to February 2012. Following the initial audit, a revised clinical diagnostic pathway was implemented. Results. In our initial audit, seven patients (4.9%) with a negative D-dimer and a low Wells score had a DVT. On review, all seven had a risk factor identified that was not included in the Wells score. No patient with negative D-dimer and low Wells score with no extra clinical risk factor had a DVT on CDUS (negative predictive value 100%). A reaudit confirmed adherence to our revised clinical diagnostic pathway. Conclusions. A negative D-dimer together with a low Wells score and no risk factors effectively excludes a lower limb DVT and an ultrasound is unnecessary in these patients.

Role of an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff level in the diagnosis algorithm of lower limb deep venous thrombosis in outpatients

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 734-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Jimenez-Guiu ◽  
Antonio Romera-Villegas ◽  
Malka Huici-Sanchez ◽  
Carlos Martinez-Rico ◽  
Ramon Vila-Coll
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Diagnosis Algorithm ◽  
D Dimer

Does an immunochromatographic D-dimer exclude acute lower limb deep venous thrombosis?

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 457-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rathan M Subramaniam ◽  
Rebekah Heath ◽  
Kim Cox ◽  
Tina Chou ◽  
Joanna Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
D Dimer

scholarly journals Reliability of Five Rapid D-Dimer Assays Compared to ELISA in the Exclusion of Deep Venous Thrombosis

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (02) ◽  
pp. 262-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
M C H Janssen ◽  
A E Heebels ◽  
M de Metz ◽  
H Verbruggen ◽  
H Wollersheim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Degradation Product ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Latex Agglutination ◽  
Fibrin Degradation Product ◽  
D Dimer

SummaryStudies measuring the fibrin degradation product D-Dimer (DD) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in patients with venographically proven deep venous thrombosis (DVT) suggest that it is possible to exclude DVT when DD level is below a certain cut-off level. However, ELISA methods are time-consuming and not available in all laboratories. Different rapid latex-agglutination assays have been investigated, but their sensitivity is considerably lower.In the present study we compared the value of four novel latex DD tests (Tinaquant®, Minutex®, Ortho® and SimpliRed®) and one rapid ELISA (VIDAS®) to a classical ELISA DD assay (Organon Mab Y18®) in 132 patients suspected of DVT.The VIDAS®, a new quantitative automated ELISA, had a sensitivity of 100% and a negative predictive value of 100% for both proximal and distal DVT at a cut-off level of 500 ng/ml. The Tinaquant® assay, a new quantitative latex method, had a sensitivity of 99% and a negative predictive value of 93% for both proximal and distal DVT at a cut-off level of 500 ng/ml. For proximal DVT only, both assays had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%. VIDAS® and Tinaquant® correlated well with ELISA (correlation of r = 0.96 and r = 0.98 respectively). Sensitivities of the semi-quantitative latex assays Minutex®, Ortho® and SimpliRed® were considerably lower (77%, 51 % and 61 % respectively).These results suggest that VIDAS® and Tinaquant® may be used instead of ELISA DD in the exclusion of DVT. Tinaquant® can be performed within 20 min and VIDAS® within 35 min. Both assays might be used as a routine screening test and should be evaluated in large clinical management studies.

scholarly journals Homocysteine is potential serological marker for predicting the risk of deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities in patients received operation of lower limb fracture

Pteridines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
Xiao Chen ◽  
Weiran Zhang ◽  
Jingmin Huang
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cut Point ◽  
Limb Fracture ◽  
And Control ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Objective The aim of the study is to investigate the correlations among serum homocysteine (Hcy), D-dimer, and the risk of developing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities in patients who underwent operation for lower limb fracture. Methods Seventy-five cases who underwent operation for lower limb fracture were included and further divided into DVT group (n = 26) and control group (n = 49) based on post-DVT diagnostic criteria. The serum Hcy and D-dimer were examined 48 h after operation. The serum Hcy and D-dimer levels were compared between the two groups. The correlation between serum Hcy and D-dimer was investigated by the Pearson correlation test. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum Hcy and D-dimer as serological markers for DVT. Results The serum Hcy concentrations were 11.96 ± 3.98 μmol/L and 7.92 ± 3.27 μmol/L for DVT and control groups, respectively, with statistical difference (t = 4.72, P < 0.01). The serum D-dimer in the DVT group was significantly higher than that of the control group (8.99 ± 4.50 vs 1.70 ± 2.11) μg/mL with statistical difference (t = 9.56, P < 0.01). Line regression analysis indicated that serum Hcy was positively correlated with serum D-dimer concentration and can be demonstrated by the equation of Y = 0.6651*X + 1.036 for the DVT group. Using serum Hcy as the biomarker for predicting DVT, the prediction sensitivity and specificity were 76.92 and 71.44%, respectively, with the AUC of 0.7804 under the cut-point of 9.54 μmol/L. For serum D-dimer, the prediction sensitivity and specificity were 96.15 and 73.47%, respectively, with the area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.9455 under the cut-point of 1.66 μg/mL. Conclusion Serum Hcy was significantly elevated in DTV patients, and hence, it can be applied as a serological marker for DVT prediction in patients who underwent operation for lower limb fracture. However, the DVT prediction performance of serum Hcy was inferior to D-dimer especially for diagnostic sensitivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document