Treatment Of Venous Thromboembolism - Case For Thrombolytic Therapy

1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
V V Kakkar

Thrombolytic therapy has a unique advantage in the treatment of patients suffering from thrombotic disease, since it is capable of inducing the dissolution of intravascular fibrin and thus causing the reduction or elimination of thrombi. The rapidity of thrombus removal distinguishes this form of treatment from anticoagulant therapy, in which normal physiological processes are allowed to restore the obstructed circulation. By quickly removing the obstruction, it should be possible to reduce the mortality arising from acute thromboembolic episodes.The results of therapy for deep-vein thrombosis have been fairly uniform. The published studies can be broadly classified into two main groups; in uncontrolled trials, partial or complete lysis of thrombi was obtained in approximately 65-80% of the patients who received streptokinase, while only 10-25% of the patients receiving heparin showed this change.In patients suffering from acute major or massive pulmonary embolism, a number of trials have demonstrated a more rapid resolution of the embolus than would be expected by treatment with heparin alone.The role of lytic therapy in preventing the late sequelae of deep vein thrombosis at present remains uncertian. Studies involving large numbers of patients and longer periods of follow-up are required to determine the extent to which post phlebitic venous insufficiency is reduced by early thrombolytic therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (5) ◽  
pp. 251-252
Author(s):  
Francisco Galeano-Valle ◽  
Jorge del-Toro-Cervera ◽  
Pablo Demelo-Rodríguez

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 512-516
Author(s):  
Vijay Bahadur Singh ◽  
Punya Pratap Singh ◽  
Rajesh Malik ◽  
Lovely Kaushal ◽  
Vijay Verma ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 181-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brahman Dharmarajah ◽  
Tristan RA Lane ◽  
Hayley M Moore ◽  
HA Martino Neumann ◽  
Eberhard Rabe ◽  
...  

Background Worldwide superficial and deep venous diseases are common and associated with significant individual and socioeconomic morbidity. Increasing burden of venous disease requires Phlebology to define itself as an independent specialty representing not only patients but the multidisciplinary physicians involved in venous care. Methods & Results In this article the scope of venous disease in Europe and subsequent future governance for treatment in the region is discussed. Superficial venous disease is common with 26.9-68.6% of European populations reported to have C2-C6 disease according to the CEAP (Clinical severity, Aetiology, Anatomy and Pathophysiology) scoring system. However, a significant disparity is observed in the treatment of superficial venous disease across Europe. Post thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) contributes to the increasing burden of deep venous disease. Aggressive thrombus removal for acute ileofemoral DVT provides a cost-effective 14.4% risk reduction in the development of PTS. Additionally, deep venous lesions requiring endovascular intervention are being increasingly performed to prevent recurrent thrombosis. The European College of Phlebology (ECoP) has been formed to provide a responsible body for the care of the European patient with venous disease. The role of the ECoP includes unifying European member states through standardised guideline production, identification of research strategy and provision of training and accreditation of physicians. Conclusion Creation of a European venous disease specific speciality will provide a patient centred approach through understanding of the impact of disease in the region and delivery of high quality diagnostics and treatment from an appropriately certified Phlebologist.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-194
Author(s):  
M.G. Vashist ◽  
S. Deswal ◽  
M. Verma ◽  
S. Kharb

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Sousa Nanji ◽  
André Torres Cardoso ◽  
João Costa ◽  
António Vaz-Carneiro

<p>The standard treatment for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) targets to reduce immediate complications, however thrombolysis could reduce the long-term complications of post-thrombotic syndrome in the affected limb. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of thrombolytic therapy and anticoagulation <em>versus </em>anticoagulation in people with deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb through the effects on pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, major bleeding, post-thrombotic complications, venous patency and venous function. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last search in April 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 4). A total of 17 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 1103 participants were included. In the experimental group receiving thrombolysis, complete clot lysis occurred more frequently and there was greater improvement in venous patency. The incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome decreased by a 1/3 and venous ulcers were less frequent. There were more bleeding complications and 3 strokes occurred in less recent studies, yet there seemed to be no significant effect on mortality. Data on the occurrence of pulmonary embolism and recurrent deep vein thrombosis were inconclusive. There are advantages to thrombolysis, yet the application of rigorous criteria is warranted to reduce bleeding complications. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is the current preferred method, as opposed to systemic thrombolysis in the past, and other studies comparing these procedures show that results are similar.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombolytic Therapy; Venous Thrombosis.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document