scholarly journals Image Guided Percutaneous Cholecystostomy–A Single Center Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (01) ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
Sathya Narayanan ◽  
Shyamkumar N. Keshava ◽  
Vinu Moses ◽  
Munawwar Ahmed ◽  
Aswin Padmanabhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hemodynamic Instability ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Emergency Cholecystectomy

Abstract Purpose To assess the technical feasibility of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) for acute cholecystitis and formulate an algorithm for PCC. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study of 35 patients (28 male and 7 female; mean age 60 years) who underwent image-guided PCC from 2008 to 2018 at a tertiary care hospital in South India. Descriptive summary statistics and frequencies were used to assess the technical success and complications. Results The patients (35/35) presented with fever, abdominal pain, and a few of them had severe sepsis. All these patients were high risk for surgery considering the comorbidities (17/35) and hemodynamic instability (18/35). PCC was performed under ultrasoundguidance, through transhepatic approach, and using single puncture and modified single puncture techniques. The procedure was technically successful in all 35 patients (100%). Two patients (2/35) did not improve clinically after PCC; hence, they were taken up for emergency cholecystectomy with high-risk consent. One patient required a repeat procedure after 3 days due to tube dislodgement. There were no major procedure-related complications. Conclusion Image-guided PCC can be performed safely and is effective for treating high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis.

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1256-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Welschbillig-Meunier ◽  
P. Pessaux ◽  
J. Lebigot ◽  
E. Lermite ◽  
Ch. Aube ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

scholarly journals Is percutaneous cholecystostomy acceptable as a bridge treatment for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients who has a biliary problem?

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S334
Author(s):  
Kwangyeol Paik ◽  
Ji Seon Oh ◽  
Chul Seung Lee ◽  
Sung Hoon Yoon ◽  
Dong Do You
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

scholarly journals Long-term outcome following percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis

HPB ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e669
Author(s):  
V. Costas-Fernandez ◽  
S. Cea-Pereira ◽  
M. Casal-Rivas ◽  
E. Casal-Nuñez ◽  
F. Ausania
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

scholarly journals APACHE IV system helps to determine cholecystostomy role in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Jiang ◽  
Guo Guo ◽  
Zhimin Yao ◽  
Yuehua Wang
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Therapeutic Effect ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Apache Iv

Abstract Background Cholecystostomy offers an alternative method for patients unfit to undergo immediate cholecystectomy. Nevertheless, the role of cholecystostomy in the clinical management of high-risk surgical patients remains unclear. One of the main problems concerning the therapeutic effect in critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis is the lack of validated, well-established scoring systems to stratify the severity of patient disease states. APACHE IV scoring system was useful to estimate the hospital mortality for high-risk patients. We try to evaluate the performance of the APACHE IV scoring system in patients over 65 years of age with acute cholecystitis and the therapeutic effect of percutaneous cholecystostomy. Methods 597 patients over 65 years of age with acute cholecystitis between January 2011 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed with the APACHE IV scores. Results Among the 597 patients, 52 successfully underwent cholecystectomy (2 died, 3.85%), 65 underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy (1 died, 1.54%), and 480 received conservative therapy (27 died, 5.63%). The fitness of the APACHE IV score prediction is good with the area under the ROC curve of 0.894. The APACHE IV models were well-calibrated (with the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic). Using the method of binary regression analysis, for the patients whose estimated mortality rate was more than 10%, cholecystostomy was an important factor for prognosis (P = 0.048). The estimated mortality of PC patients before and after operation was compared, which indicated that the estimated mortality after puncture was significantly decreased, either in the whole patient group (P = 0.004) or in the group with an estimated mortality greater than 10% (P = 0.008). Conclusion The APACHE IV scoring system showed that cholecystostomy was a safe and effective treatment for elderly high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis.

scholarly journals Practice of “Defensive Medicine” Among Doctors at a Tertiary Care Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
Binus Bhandari ◽  
Dipendra Khadka ◽  
Prem Saxena ◽  
S.M. Mishra
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Defensive Medicine ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Risk Patients

Introduction: Defensive medicine is the short term coined for a defensive medical decision making.It means advising diagnostic tests, prescribing more drugs than required or avoids treating and operating high risk patients. These may not be the best options for the patient but the practice among doctors is currently adopted to avoid litigation. A situation aggravated by the promulgation of tough consumer laws and other criminal laws applicable to health care providers. This study was conducted to assess the frequency of defensive medicine practice among doctors at the teaching medical college hospital of NGMC. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted at Nepalgunj Medical College, Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur, a tertiary care center in between January to December 2018. A questionnaire was developed to assess the various aspects of defensive medicine practice. In this study, a total of 75 doctors participated. Results: Practice of defensive medicine was common in age between 30-40 years. Fear of caring high risk patients (76%)), ordering un-necessary tests (56%)) followed by avoiding high risk procedures (46%) were common forms of defensive medicine practices observed in sampled doctors. Senior faculties were found practicing more defensive medicine than juniors (69.4% versus 30.6%) and more in surgical field as compared to non-surgical 61% vs. 39%. Conclusion: Defensive medical practice in various ways is common among the doctors. This has produced a positive impact in the form of greater communications with the patients and awareness to have a good medical record keeping. However, the negative impacts on the doctors have been more in the form of prescribing more investigations, drugs, more referral and reluctance to accept high risk patients if there is choice.  

Acute cholecystitis in high surgical risk patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy or emergency cholecystectomy?

2012 ◽  
Vol 204 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Rodríguez-Sanjuán ◽  
Arantxa Arruabarrena ◽  
Laura Sánchez-Moreno ◽  
Francisco González-Sánchez ◽  
Luis A. Herrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
Surgical Risk ◽  
High Surgical Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Emergency Cholecystectomy

scholarly journals Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Severe Acute Cholecystitis: A Useful Procedure in High-Risk Patients for Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Aroori ◽  
C. Mangan ◽  
L. Reza ◽  
N. Gafoor
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Acalculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Physiological Reserve ◽  
American Society

Background: Acute cholecystitis has the potential to cause sepsis and death, particularly in patients with poor physiological reserve. The gold standard treatment of acute cholecystitis (cholecystectomy) is often not safe in high-risk patients and recourse is made to percutaneous cholecystostomy as either definite treatment or temporizing measure. The aim of this study is to evaluate early and late outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis treated at our institution. Methods: All patients who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis (excluding patients with malignancy) between January 2005 and September 2014 were included in the study. Results: A total of 53 patients (22 female, median age, 74 years; range, 27–95 years) underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy during the study period. In total, 12 patients (22.6%) had acalculous cholecystitis. The main indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy were significant co-morbidities (n = 28, 52.8%) and patients too unstable for surgery (n = 21, 39.6%). The median time to percutaneous cholecystostomy from diagnosis of acute cholecystitis was 3.6 days (range, 0–45 days). The median length of hospital stay was 27 (range, 4–87) days. The overall 90-day mortality was 9.3% with two further deaths at 12-month follow up. The mortality was significantly higher in patients with American Society of Anesthesiology grade 4–5 (18% vs 0% in American Society of Anesthesiology grade 2–3, p = 0.026) and in patients with acalculous cholecystitis (25% vs 4.5%, p = 0.035). The overall readmission rate was 18%. A total of 24 (45.2%) patients had surgery: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, n = 11; laparoscopic converted to open, n = 5; open total cholecystectomy, n = 5; open cholecystectomy, n = 1; laparotomy and washout, n = 1; laparotomy partial cholecystectomy and closure of perforated small intestine and gastrostomy, n = 1. Conclusion: Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a useful temporary or permanent procedure in patients with acute cholecystitis of both calculous and acalculous origin, who are unfit for surgery.

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients

1987 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Klimberg ◽  
Irvin Hawkins ◽  
Stephen B. Vogel
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document