scholarly journals Managing Diabetes in the COVID-19 Era: Focus on COVID-19 Safe Clinics, Telemedicine, and Diabetes Self-Management

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (01) ◽  
pp. 003-007
Author(s):  
Rajan Palui ◽  
Subhodip Pramanik ◽  
Arindam Ray ◽  
Uttio Gupta ◽  
Sattik Siddhanta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Social Hygiene ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Clinic Practice ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

AbstractNovel coronavirus disease 2019 is a dreaded pandemic that is going to persist, and diabetic people with poor glycemic control are at high risk of complications and death from it. Social distancing being the only way to prevent infection spread, it is very difficult to continue usual clinic-based diabetes care. So, in this review, we focus to discuss safe clinic practice recommendations, scope of telemedicine in care of follow-up patients, and diabetes self-management that every individual with diabetes needs to follow. These issues will be of utmost important as we need to understand and implement personal and social hygiene in a better way even in post lockdown period.

scholarly journals Determinants of Poor Glycemic Control in Patients with Kidney Transplants: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study in Canada

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205435812092262
Author(s):  
Daniel Chan Chun Kong ◽  
Ayub Akbari ◽  
Janine Malcolm ◽  
Mary-Anne Doyle ◽  
Stephanie Hoar
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Readmission Rates

Background: Kidney transplant immunosuppressive medications are known to impair glucose metabolism, causing worsened glycemic control in patients with pre-transplant diabetes mellitus (PrTDM) and new onset of diabetes after transplant (NODAT). Objectives: To determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of both PrTDM and NODAT patients. Design: This is a single-center retrospective observational cohort study. Setting: The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada. Participant: A total of 132 adult (>18 years) kidney transplant patients from 2013 to 2015 were retrospectively followed 3 years post-transplant. Measurements: Patient characteristics, transplant information, pre- and post-transplant HbA1C and random glucose, follow-up appointments, complications, and readmissions. Methods: We looked at the prevalence of poor glycemic control (HbA1c >8.5%) in the PrTDM group before and after transplant and compared the prevalence, follow-up appointments, and rate of complications and readmission rates in both the PrTDM and NODAT groups. We determined the risk factors of developing poor glycemic control in PrTDM patients and NODAT. Student t-test was used to compare means, chi-squared test was used to compare percentages, and univariate analysis to determine risk factors was performed by logistical regression. Results: A total of 42 patients (31.8%) had PrTDM and 12 patients (13.3%) developed NODAT. Poor glycemic control (HbA1c >8.5%) was more prevalent in the PrTDM (76.4%) patients compared to those with NODAT (16.7%; P < .01). PrTDM patients were more likely to receive follow-up with an endocrinologist ( P < .01) and diabetes nurse ( P < .01) compared to those with NODAT. There were no differences in the complication and readmission rates for PrTDM and NODAT patients. Receiving a transplant from a deceased donor was associated with having poor glycemic control, odds ratio (OR) = 3.34, confidence interval (CI = 1.08, 10.4), P = .04. Both patient age, OR = 1.07, CI (1.02, 1.3), P < .01, and peritoneal dialysis prior to transplant, OR = 4.57, CI (1.28, 16.3), P = .02, were associated with NODAT. Limitations: Our study was limited by our small sample size. We also could not account for any diabetes screening performed outside of our center or follow-up appointments with family physicians or community endocrinologists. Conclusion: Poor glycemic control is common in the kidney transplant population. Glycemic targets for patients with PrTDM are not being met in our center and our study highlights the gap in the literature focusing on the prevalence and outcomes of poor glycemic control in these patients. Closer follow-up and attention may be needed for those who are at risk for worse glycemic control, which include older patients, those who received a deceased donor kidney, and/or prior peritoneal dialysis.

scholarly journals One-year follow-up of a remotely delivered epilepsy self-management program in high-risk people with epilepsy

2019 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 237-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Sajatovic ◽  
Kari Colon-Zimmermann ◽  
Mustafa Kahriman ◽  
Edna Fuentes-Casiano ◽  
Christopher Burant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Self Management ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Factors associated with poor glycemic control among type-2 diabetes mellitus patients in Yemen

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1539-1546
Author(s):  
Sultan A.M. Saghir ◽  
Abdullah E.A. Alhariri ◽  
Sameer A. Alkubat ◽  
Amer A. Almiamn ◽  
Saleem H. Aladaileh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Diabetic Patients

Purpose: To determine the status of glycemic control and its associated factors among adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Hodeidah City, Yemen. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved T2DM patients attending an outpatient clinic at the Military Hospital in Hodeidah, from January to March 2017. Relevant socio-demographic characteristics, clinical factors and self-management behaviours were recorded in face-to-face interviews. Blood pressure, body weight, and height measurements were also obtained. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and lipid profile were evaluated. Urine samples were also obtained and analysed by albuminuria assay. Results: Of 246 participants, 73.2 % showed poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7 %). Female patients, those aged ≥ 40 years, the illiterate, and Khat chewers were more likely to have poor glycemic control. Moreover, longer disease duration, insulin administration and albuminuria were significantly associated with poor glycemic control. In contrast, a healthy diet, physical exercise, proper self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and taking medicines as prescribed significantly increased the likelihood of good glycemic control. Conclusion: A majority of the Yemeni diabetic patients have poor glycemic control. To achieve better awareness, diabetes educational programs that highlight the benefits of self-management are recommended.

Factors Predicting Adequate Glycemic Control after Participation in Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Program: The Role of Behavioral Change

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-417
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Management Education ◽  
Goal Achievement ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Initial Visit ◽  
Baseline Hba1c ◽  
Insulin Use ◽  
Diabetes Educators ◽  
Behavioral Goal

Objective: To explore the predictors of achieving adequate glycemic control at a 6-months follow-up in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who participated in the diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) program. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of T2D patients who completed the DSMES program (an initial visit and a 3-month follow-up) at Ramathibodi Hospital between 2014 and 2017 was conducted. Behavioral goals were set at the initial visit and whether these were achieved by the patients was assessed at a 3-month follow-up. Diabetes history, baseline, and 6-month hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) values were collected. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of adequate glycemic control at 6-month, defined as HbA1c of less than 7% or less than 7.5% in those younger than 65 years or those 65 years or older, respectively. Results: Ninety-two patients were included, with a mean (SD) age 60.7 (10.9) years, an average diabetes duration of 9.1 (9.5) years and 51.1% were using insulin. Seventy-six patients (82.6%) reported that they achieved behavioral goals as set at the initial visit, and 56.5% had adequate glycemic control at 6-month. Multiple regression analysis adjusting for age, baseline HbA1c, and insulin use revealed that behavioral goal achievement at three months was independently associated with HbA1c achievement at six months (OR 3.473, 95% CI 1.005 to 12.001), while higher baseline HbA1c was associated with a lower likelihood of achieving adequate glycemic control (OR 0.727, 95% CI 0.540 to 0.979). Conclusion: Behavioral goal achievement was an independent predictor of adequate glycemic control in participants of the DSMES programs, suggesting that adherence to behavioral changes can improve clinical outcomes. Goal setting skills should be adopted by diabetes educators and incorporated as a key part of DSMES process. Keywords: Factors predicting glycemic control, Diabetes self-management education, Behavioral goal achievement, Diabetic educators

scholarly journals Predictors of poor glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes on follow-up care at a tertiary healthcare setting in Ethiopia

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gebre Teklemariam Demoz ◽  
Alem Gebremariam ◽  
Helen Yifter ◽  
Minyahil Alebachew ◽  
Yirga Legesse Niriayo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
Poor Glycemic Control ◽  
Follow Up Care ◽  
Tertiary Healthcare

scholarly journals LO53: Emergency department visits for hyperglycemia: through the eyes of the patient

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S26-S26
Author(s):  
J. Yan ◽  
D. Azzam ◽  
S. Liu ◽  
T. Spaic ◽  
M. Columbus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Post Discharge

Introduction: Patients with poorly-controlled diabetes often visit the emergency department (ED) for treatment of hyperglycemia. While previous qualitative studies have examined the patient experience of diabetes as a chronic illness, there are no studies describing patients’ perceptions of ED care for hyperglycemia. The objective of this study was to explore the patient experience regarding ED hyperglycemia visits, and to characterize perceived barriers to adequate glycemic control post-discharge. Methods: This study was conducted at a tertiary care academic centre in London, Ontario. A qualitative constructivist grounded theory methodology was used to understand the experience of adult patient partners who have had an ED hyperglycemia visit. Patient partners, purposively sampled to capture a breadth of age, sex, disease and presentation frequency were invited to participate in a semi-structured individual interview to probe their experiences. Sampling continued until a theoretical framework representing key experiences and expectations reached sufficiency. Data were collected and analyzed iteratively using a constant comparative approach. Results: 22 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes were interviewed. Participants sought care in the ED over other options because of their concern of having a potentially life-threatening condition, advice from a healthcare provider or family member, or a perceived lack of convenient alternatives to the ED based on time and location. Participants’ care expectations centred around symptom relief, glycemic control, reassurance and education, and seeking referral to specialist diabetes care post-discharge. Finally, perceived system barriers that challenged participants’ glycemic control included affordability of medical supplies and medications, access to follow-up and, in some cases, the transition from pediatric to adult diabetes care. Conclusion: Patients with diabetes utilize the ED for a variety of urgent and emergent hyperglycemic concerns. In addition to providing excellent medical treatment, ED healthcare providers should consider patients’ expectations when caring for those presenting with hyperglycemia. Future studies will focus on developing strategies to help patients navigate some of the barriers that exist within our current limited healthcare system, enhance follow-up care, and improve short- and long-term health outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document