A Novel ABC Score Predicts Mortality in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Author(s):  
Ying-Ying Zheng ◽  
Ting-Ting Wu ◽  
Ying Gao ◽  
Qian-Qian Guo ◽  
Yan-Yan Ma ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective In the present study, we aimed to establish a novel score to predict long-term mortality of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods A total of 2,174 NSTE-ACS patients from the CORFCHD-ZZ study were enrolled as the derivation cohort. The validation cohort including 1,808 NSTE-ACS patients were from the CORFCHD-PCI study. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and area under the curve (AUC) evaluation were used to select the candidate variables. The model performance was validated internally and externally. The primary outcome was cardiac mortality (CM). We also explored the model performance for all-cause mortality (ACM). Results Initially, 28 risk factors were selected and ranked according to their AUC values. Finally, we selected age, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and creatinine to develop a novel prediction model named “ABC” model. The ABC model had a high discriminatory ability for both CM (C-index: 0.774, p < 0.001) and ACM (C-index: 0.758, p < 0.001) in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, the C-index of CM was 0.802 (p < 0.001) and that of ACM was 0.797 (p < 0.001), which suggested good discrimination. In addition, this model had adequate calibration in both the derivation and validation cohorts. Furthermore, the ABC score outperformed the GRACE score to predict mortality in NSTE-ACS patients who underwent PCI. Conclusion In the present study, we developed and validated a novel model to predict mortality in patients with NSTE-ACS who underwent PCI. This model can be used as a credible tool for risk assessment and management of NSTE-ACS after PCI.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Héctor E. Flores-Salinas ◽  
Fidel Casillas-Muñoz ◽  
Yeminia Valle ◽  
Cesar M. Guzmán-Sánchez ◽  
Jorge Ramon Padilla-Gutiérrez

Introduction and Objective. In Mexico, there has been an increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease due to rising life expectancy, westernized lifestyle, lack of prevention, and industrialized exposure. This article describes the pharmacological treatment, surgical interventions, and associated clinical complications in patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and their impact on in-hospital mortality frequency in a Cardiology Unit in Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Methods. This is a retrospective study including male and female patients aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with ACS. The collected data included demographic characteristics, risk factors, medications, electrocardiograms, surgical procedures, and in-hospital deaths. Results. There are at least 20% more diagnoses of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in this hospital compared to the latest national reports in Mexico. The most common risk factors were type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, and dyslipidaemia. Diabetic patients with a clinical history of percutaneous coronary intervention had a higher risk of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction than nondiabetics (OR: 2.34; p=0.013), also smoking patients with previous heart surgery than nonsmokers (OR: 7.73; p=0.0007). The average in-hospital mortality was 3.6% for ACS. Conclusions. There is a higher percentage of coronary interventionism and improvement in pharmacological treatment, which is reflected in lower mortality. The substantial burden of T2DM could be related to a higher number of cases of STEMI. Diabetics with precedent percutaneous coronary intervention and smokers with previous heart surgery have an increased risk of subsequent infarction.


2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 860-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Crouch ◽  
Jean M Nappi ◽  
Kai I Cheang

OBJECTIVE: To review the contemporary role of the glycoprotein (GYP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and to provide an algorithm based on currently available evidence for specific agents. DATA SOURCES: Primary articles were identified by a MEDLINE search (1966–January 2003); references cited in these articles provided additional resources. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All of the articles identified from data sources were considered for relevant information; this article primarily addresses large, controlled or comparative studies, and meta-analyses. DATA SYNTHESIS: The role of GYP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing PCI and those with ACS has progressed markedly. To date, abciximab has the most robust data in patients undergoing PCI, particularly high-risk individuals. In PCI patients with lower risk (e.g., elective stenting), eptifibatide is a reasonable first-line option. Data do not support tirofiban for routine use in patients undergoing PCI. For individuals with signs and symptoms of ACS, specifically unstable angina or non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), eptifibatide or tirofiban is recommended in high-risk patients when a conservative approach is used (PCI is not planned). Abciximab is not recommended in this situation. In patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), abciximab is the only GYP IIb/IIIa inhibitor evaluated in large, well-designed investigations. For medical management in combination with a fibrinolytic agent, the role of abciximab remains unclear. For patients undergoing primary PCI for the management of STEMI, the available evidence supports the use of abciximab, albeit further investigation is warranted. CONCLUSIONS: The role of GYP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in clinical cardiology continues to evolve. Choice of the agent depends on situation of use, patient-specific characteristics and risk stratification, and, in the case of ACS, chosen management strategy (medical management or intervention).


2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-62
Author(s):  
V. I. Denisov ◽  
K. G. Pereverzeva ◽  
D. Y. Boyakov ◽  
A. D. Chuchunov ◽  
D. A. Khazov

Aim: to study the risk factors, clinical peculiarities, diagnosis and treatment of young patients with myocardial infarction (≤ 44 years).Material and methods. The research included 189 patients, who had MI in the period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019 at the age of ≤ 44; 92.1% of patients were men. The average age of all patients was 41,2 (37.3; 43.6).Results. Most frequent risk factors for the development of MI were: smoking — in 77.8%, essential hypertension — in 73.5%, burdened inheritance — in 49.2%, obesity — in 39.7% and pancreatic diabetes — in 10.6% of all cases. ST segment elevation was registered on the electrocardiogram in 87,8% of patients; 4.2% of them had only thrombolytic therapy; thrombolytic therapy was followed by coronarography with the intention of performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 30.7% of cases; coronarography with the intention of performing primary PCI was applied to 54.2% of patients. PCI was performed in 76.5% of patients. 12.2% of patients had acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation, and 95.7% of them had coronarography with the intention of performing percutaneous coronary intervention. PCI was performed in 73.9% of patients. Assignment frequency of beta-adrenergic blocking agent prescription was 95,2% (178 out of 187), аngiotensin-convertingenzyme inhibitors and sartans — 95.2% (178 out of 187), statins — 99.5% (188 of 189), dual antiplatelet therapy — 99.5% (188 out of 189), mineral corticoid receptor antagonists with ejection fraction of left ventricle of heart ≤ 40% — 28.6% (2 of 7).Conclusion. The conducted research aims at the discussion of the vital topic of young patients with myocardial infarction management. It focuses on risk factors, clinical and angiographic presentation, and secondary prevention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document