scholarly journals Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Settings

Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Omer ◽  
Jose E. Exaire ◽  
Jacob C. Jentzer ◽  
Yader B. Sandoval ◽  
Mandeep Singh ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite the widespread adoption of primary percutaneous intervention and modern antithrombotic therapy, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains the leading cause of death in the United States and remains one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Certain high-risk patients present a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. The widespread adoption of primary percutaneous intervention in addition to modern antithrombotic therapy has resulted in substantial improvement in the short- and long-term prognosis following STEMI. In this review, we aim to provide a brief analysis of the state-of-the-art treatment for patients presenting with STEMI, focusing on cardiogenic shock, current treatment and controversies, cardiac arrest, and diagnosis and treatment of mechanical complications, as well as multivessel and left main-related STEMI.

Angiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yalcin Velibey ◽  
Tolga Sinan Guvenc ◽  
Koray Demir ◽  
Ahmet Oz ◽  
Evliya Akdeniz ◽  
...  

We retrospectively analyzed short- and long-term outcomes of patients who received bailout tirofiban during primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI). A total of 2681patients who underwent pPCI between 2009 and 2014 were analyzed; 1331 (49.6%) out of 2681 patients received bailout tirofiban. Using propensity score matching, 2100 patients (1050 patient received bail-out tirofiban) with similar preprocedural characteristics were identified. Patients who received bailout tirofiban had a significantly higher incidence of acute stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and major cardiac or cerebrovascular events during the in-hospital period. There were numerically fewer deaths in the bailout tirofiban group in the unmatched cohort (1.7% vs 2.5%, P = .118). In the matched cohort, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower (1.1% vs 2.4%, P = .03), and survival at 12 and 60 months were higher (96.9% vs 95.2%, P = .056 for 12 months and 95.1% vs 92.0%, P = .01 for 60 months) in the bailout tirofiban group. After multivariate adjustment, bailout tirofiban was associated with a lower mortality at 12 months (odds ratio [OR]: 0.554, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.349-0.880, P = .012) and 60 months (OR: 0.595, 95% CI, 0.413-0.859, P = .006). In conclusion, bailout tirofiban strategy during pPCI is associated with a lower short- and long-term mortality, although in-hospital complications were more frequent.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin W Tung ◽  
Zhe Yan Ng ◽  
William Kristanto ◽  
Kalyar W Saw ◽  
winnie C sia ◽  
...  

Introduction: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality leading to loss of productivity and productive life years, especially in younger patients. Understanding the characteristics of younger patients with STEMI and their outcomes could help focus public health efforts in STEMI prevention within a population. Aim: This study aims to compare the characteristics and outcomes of younger versus older patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI). Methods: Data from the Coronary Care Unit database of the National University Hospital between July 2015 to June 2019 was reviewed. Patients were divided into Young (<50 years old) or Old (≥50 years old) groups. Results: Of the 1818 consecutive patients with STEMI and underwent PPCI, 465 (25.6%) were Young patients with mean age 43±4.9 years old as compared to Old patients with mean age 63.2±9.4 years old. Young patients were more likely to be male (94% vs. 85%, p<0.0001), current smokers (61.1% vs. 42.6%, p<0.0001), of Indian ethnicity (32% vs. 16.3%, p<0.0001), and had family history of myocardial infarction (MI) (18.1% vs. 9.5%, p<0.0001). Compared to Old patients, Young patients had better post-MI left ventricular ejection fraction (49.5±10.7 vs. 47.8±11.6, p=0.007) with fewer of them suffered from cardiogenic shock (7.1% vs. 13.2%, p<0.0001), and had lower mortality at one year (3.4% vs. 10.4%, p<0.0001). Although diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia was less common among the Young patients when compared to the Old, the prevalence was high in the range of 28 to 38% (Table 1). Conclusions: A sizable proportion of STEMI patients are younger than 50 years old. The risk profile of these younger patients can be attributed to constitutional factors and smoking but other cardiovascular risk factors are also prevalent among them. Although mortality is lower among the younger than the older patients, it is not negligible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document