Endoscopic Management of Enterocutaneous Fistulae

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelin A. Mirkin ◽  
Eric M. Pauli
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Endoscopic Therapy ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Therapeutic Endoscopy ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Unique Challenge ◽  
Endoscopic Techniques ◽  
Definitive Management

AbstractEnterocutaneous fistulae (ECFs), abnormal epithelialized connections between the small bowel and skin, are associated with significant morbidity, and pose a unique challenge to patients and clinicians. Management of ECF requires sepsis control, effluent management, nutritional support, and local wound care. Traditionally, surgical intervention was required for ECF that failed to close with conservative management. With the rise of therapeutic endoscopy, new management strategies have emerged. Fluoroscopy-guided endoscopy is now used to delineate anatomy and determine potential therapy options. Definitive endoscopic management may involve through-the-scope and over-the-scope clips, or endoscopic suturing devices. Adjuncts to definitive management include removing foreign bodies, alleviating distal obstructions, and de-epithelializing fistula tracts. Even if an ECF is not amenable to definitive endoscopic therapy, endoscopy may help temporize and optimize a patient preoperatively. Endoscopy allows for the placement and repositioning of drains, stent placement to allow for diversion or improved wound care, and the placement of enteric feeding access. As endoscopic techniques expand and more tools become available, the ability to manage complex problems, such as ECF, endoscopically will grow.

Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in an Academic General Surgical Program: Implications for Acute Care Surgeons

2020 ◽  
pp. 155335062095780
Author(s):  
James T. Ross ◽  
Norah E. Liang ◽  
Carter C. Lebares ◽  
Jonathan T. Carter ◽  
Hobart W. Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Endoscopic Therapy ◽  
Acute Care Surgery ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Endoscopic Techniques ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
American Society ◽  
Care Surgery

Background. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an important tool in the evolving specialty of acute care surgery (ACS). Understanding the types of nonelective EGDs performed by ACS groups is important for the development of ACS programs and the training of future general surgeons. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of all EGDs performed by ACS surgeons at a single urban academic center over a 5-year period (January 2013-December 2018). Results. A total of 495 EGDs were performed, of which 129 (26%) were urgent, nonelective procedures. Patients who underwent urgent EGD were younger than those who underwent elective procedures (median 55 vs 60 years, P = .03), had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes (median ASA 3 vs 2, P = .0002), and longer hospital stays (median 5 days vs 0 days, P < .0001). The most common indications for urgent endoscopies were the management of leak, dysphagia, or stenosis in patients with a history of foregut surgery, followed by the management of esophageal perforation. The success rate of endoscopic therapy was high (median 88%, interquartile range (IQR) 78-89%). However, some patients required multiple interventions (median 1, IQR 1-3), and patients treated for leaks were less likely to be successfully treated with endoscopic therapy alone than patients treated for other indications (success rate 65% vs 88%, P = .003). Conclusions. Our experience suggests that EGD has an important role in current ACS practice and that endoscopic management is safe and effective in a range of urgent surgical scenarios. Future ACS surgeons should be facile with endoscopic techniques.

scholarly journals Impacted Metallic Spring Requiring Cervical Esophagotomy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature on Foreign Body Removal

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Patrick Stoner ◽  
Eric Hilgenfeldt ◽  
Alexander Schlachterman
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Thoracic Esophagus ◽  
Unique Case ◽  
Foreign Body Removal ◽  
Endoscopic Techniques ◽  
Successful Removal ◽  
Upper Thoracic ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Foreign body ingestion is a commonly encountered problem and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. When removal of a foreign body from the upper gastrointestinal tract is indicated, endoscopy is the modality of choice and has a high reported success rate. However, in less than 1% of cases, endoscopic removal of a foreign body is unsuccessful and surgical intervention is necessary. We report a unique case of a large, sharp metallic spring swallowed by an incarcerated patient which subsequently became lodged in his upper thoracic esophagus. This spring was unable to be removed endoscopically due to risk of perforation and cervical esophagotomy was needed for its successful removal, illustrating the limitations of endoscopic techniques in removal of foreign bodies and the role surgical intervention has in these rare instances.

scholarly journals Endotherapy for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 078-092
Author(s):  
Chhagan L. Birda ◽  
Antriksh Kumar ◽  
Jayanta Samanta
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Thermal Therapy ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ◽  
Transfusion Strategy ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Primary Hemostasis ◽  
Mechanical Therapy ◽  
Definitive Management ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

AbstractNonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH) is a common GI emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Triaging cases on the basis of patient-related factors, restrictive blood transfusion strategy, and hemodynamic stabilization are key initial steps for the management of patients with NVUGIH. Endoscopy remains a vital step for both diagnosis and definitive management. Multiple studies and guidelines have now defined the optimum timing for performing the endoscopy after hospitalization, to better the outcome. Conventional methods for achieving endoscopic hemostasis, such as injection therapy, contact, and noncontact thermal therapy, and mechanical therapy, such as through-the-scope clips, have reported to have 76 to 90% efficacy for primary hemostasis. Newer modalities to enhance hemostasis rates have come in vogue. Many of these modalities, such as cap-mounted clips, coagulation forceps, and hemostatic powders have proved to be efficacious in multiple studies. Thus, the newer modalities are recommended not only for management of persistent bleed and recurrent bleed after failed initial hemostasis, using conventional modalities but also now being advocated for primary hemostasis. Failure of endotherapy would warrant radiological or surgical intervention. Some newer tools to optimize endotherapy, such as endoscopic Doppler probes, for determining flow in visible or underlying vessels in ulcer bleed are now being evaluated. This review is focused on the technical aspects and efficacy of various endoscopic modalities, both conventional and new. A synopsis of the various studies describing and comparing the modalities have been outlined. Postendoscopic management including Helicobacter pylori therapy and starting of anticoagulants and antiplatelets have also been outlined.

scholarly journals Challenges in Management of Tracheobronchial Foreign Bodies with Delayed Presentation: An Institutional Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darwin Kaushal ◽  
Amit Goyal ◽  
Kapil Soni ◽  
Bikram Choudhury ◽  
Nithin Prakasan Nair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Rigid Bronchoscopy ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Betel Nut ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Tracheobronchial Foreign Body ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Definitive Management

Abstract Introduction Airway foreign bodies are emergencies involving multidisciplinary departments like Pediatrics, Aneasthesiology and Otorhinolaryngology. It is always a challenge to diagnose and manage patients who present late to our emergencies. Objective In the present study, we aim to analyze the various challenges faced during the management of tracheobronchial foreign bodies with delayed presentation. Methods A retrospective hospital record-based analysis of patients who presented to us with tracheobronchial foreign bodies from January 2017 to February 2020 was performed. All patients until the age of 16 years old were included in the present study. We assessed the demographics, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data of the patients. Results Seventeen patients were analyzed in the study. Among these, 44.4% of the patients had delayed presentation (> 1 month). The majority of the patients had an organic foreign body (Supari or betel nut). All patients underwent rigid bronchoscopy, followed by optical forceps-assisted removal of the foreign body. A total of 82% of the patients had granulations around the foreign body. Conclusion Management of delayed presentation tracheobronchial foreign body is a big challenge for Otorhinolaryngologists. The key factors for preventing complications in the definitive management of tracheobronchial foreign bodies are preoperative planning, multi-discipline teamwork, surgeon expertise and technique.

scholarly journals Complicated Diverticular Disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Coakley ◽  
Bradley R. Davis ◽  
Kevin R. Kasten
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Diverticular Disease ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Complicated Diverticulitis ◽  
Careful Attention ◽  
Correct Treatment ◽  
Treatment Paradigm ◽  
Colonic Diverticular Disease

AbstractThe modern management of colonic diverticular disease involves grouping patients into uncomplicated or complicated diverticulitis, after which the correct treatment paradigm is instituted. Recent controversies suggest overlap in management strategies between these two groups. While most reports still support surgical intervention for the treatment of complicated diverticular disease, more data are forthcoming suggesting complicated diverticulitis does not merit surgical resection in all scenarios. Given the significant risk for complication in surgery for diverticulitis, careful attention should be paid to patient and procedure selection. Here, we define complicated diverticulitis, discuss options for surgical intervention, and explain strategies for avoiding operative pitfalls that result in early and late postoperative complications.

scholarly journals 778 Management of Colorectal Anastomotic leaks: The East of England Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Aker ◽  
A Askari ◽  
M Rabie ◽  
M Aly ◽  
S Adegbola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Mortality ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Anastomotic Leaks ◽  
Consensus Approach ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
Population Mortality ◽  
Radiological Intervention

Abstract Introduction Colorectal anastomotic leaks (AL) are an unfortunate occurrence and are associated with a high mortality. The aim of this multi-centre study is to explore the different management strategies used and compare outcomes in the management of AL. Method All patients who had an AL were included at seven hospitals across the East of England. Morbidity, mortality, and survival were compared across the different management strategies. Results A total of 247 consecutive patients were included of which 60.3% were male and the median age was 68 (IQR 57-77). Half of patients were initially managed conservatively, a further 10.5% had a radiological procedure. 39.7% required surgery as an initial treatment. Of those who initially did not have a surgical intervention (n = 149), 10.7% (n = 16/149) eventually required laparotomy. Ultimately, 42.7% (n = 106/248) required a laparotomy. The 30- and 90-day across the entire population mortality were 3.6% and 4.9% respectively. There were no significant differences in mortality or long-terms survival between the different initial treatment modalities. Conclusions Despite initial conservative, antibiotic and radiological intervention being successful in the majority of patients, two out of five patients will still require a laparotomy. A consensus approach is required to standardise management in these difficult scenarios.

Advanced Endoscopic Tools

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor C. Fung
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Therapeutic Endoscopy ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Evolution And Development ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Endoscopic Clips

AbstractThe advent and success of therapeutic endoscopy has expanded the utilization of endoscopy as an effective alternative to surgical intervention in some cases with decreased morbidity, improved outcomes, and shortened length of hospital stay. Gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, leaks, fistulas, and strictures have become increasingly managed by endoscopy with the evolution and development of endoscopic tools for effective closure of full-thickness gastrointestinal defects, dilation, and hemostasis. This article reviews the characteristics and role of endoscopic clips, stents, dilation balloons, endoscopic knives, and suturing devices.

Foreign Body Ingestion

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Jajoo ◽  
Allison R Schulman
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
The United States ◽  
Foreign Body Ingestion ◽  
Gi Tract ◽  
Food Bolus ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
Food Bolus Impaction ◽  
Bolus Impaction

Foreign-body ingestion and food bolus impaction are common causes of esophageal obstruction, with an annual incidence of 13 cases per 100,000, and represent approximately 4% of all emergency endoscopies. Although the majority of foreign bodies that travel to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract will pass spontaneously, 10 to 20% must be removed endoscopically, and 1 to 5% will require surgery. Key diagnostic and therapeutic decisions are based on common factors, including the type of ingested object, number of objects, timing between ingestion and presentation, anatomic location of the object, and presence or absence of symptoms. Complications relating to foreign-body ingestion are typically uncommon; however, the associated morbidity may be severe and occasionally life threatening, and despite the fact that overall mortality has been extremely low, it has been estimated that up to 1,500 deaths occur annually in the United States as a result of foreign-body ingestion. The initial and follow-up management strategies are crucial to preventing morbidity. This review details the epidemiology, etiology and pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and complications of foreign-body ingestion. Figures show examples of foreign bodies in the esophagus and stomach, three esophageal areas where a foreign body is likely to be impacted, examples of a meat bolus in the esophagus, radiograph of a patient who swallowed one nail and three batteries, and examples of linear erosions of the esophagus and stomach. Tables list the most common GI pathology predisposing individuals to esophageal foreign-body impaction, timing and management of food bolus impaction and foreign-body ingestion, endoscopic management strategies for food bolus impaction and ingested foreign bodies, and radiographic and surgical management strategies for monitoring progress of foreign-body passage through the GI tract. This review contains 5 highly rendered figures, 4 tables, and 78 references.

Caustic and Toxic Ingestions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
CDR Thomas Q Gallagher ◽  
CDR Robert L Ricca
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Tracheobronchial Tree ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Caustic Ingestion ◽  
Stricture Formation ◽  
Accidental Ingestion

Ingestion of caustic substances remains a potentially fatal public health concern with extensive morbidity and the possibility of long-term sequelae. The management strategies of these complex injuries continue to be extensively studied in the literature. Areas of interest include the most efficacious treatment of caustic esophageal stricture to preserve the native esophagus, use of steroids, and use of esophageal stents. Prevention of accidental ingestion through strategies to limit the availability of caustic substances is a key factor in reducing the incidence of injury, but there continues to be a high rate of accidental ingestion in developing countries with less rigorous manufacturing standards. Initial evaluation includes endoscopic evaluation of the esophagus and tracheobronchial tree. Optimal treatment strategies, including the use of proton pump inhibitors to reduce gastroesophageal reflux, steroid use to prevent stricture formation, and use of stents for management of strictures, continue to be debated. Initial surgical management includes esophagectomy for full-thickness injury with abdominal exploration. Multiple surgical options exist for both restoration of gastrointestinal continuity after esophagectomy and the management of strictures refractory to medical management, including reverse gastric tube, colonic interposition, and gastric advancement. Numerous small studies have evaluated the efficacy of these interventions, but there continues to be a need for larger prospective studies to develop a worldwide consensus opinion on best practices. We provide a review of the recent literature and practice recommendations for the management of injuries due to caustic ingestion. Key words: caustic ingestion, endoscopic management, stricture, surgical management 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document