Immunosuppression following liver transplantation and the course of inflammatory bowel disease – a case control study

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (02) ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Mogl ◽  
Daniel Baumgart ◽  
Andreas Fischer ◽  
Johann Pratschke ◽  
Andreas Pascher

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of immunosuppression following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) on course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including disease activity and complications. Methods Out of 1168 patients undergoing liver transplantation between 1988 and 2000 at our center, we identified those with IBD (n = 67). In a comparative cohort study, IBD patients after OLT were compared to controls without OLT. All drugs including immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory medication and complications during follow-up were recorded in 6-month intervals. Also, surgical interventions before and after OLT as well as endoscopic interventions with macroscopic and microscopic findings were collected and analyzed. Additionally, development of malignant neoplasias was recorded. Results Of the 67 individuals with IBD and OLT, 41 were available for analyses and compared with 42 controls. The mean follow-up was 7.4 (range: 3 – 15) years. Short-term therapy with calcineurin inhibitors or mycophenolate mofetil led to short-term remission, yet sustained remission could only be achieved in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil. At 14.5 years, clinical remission was reached by significantly more patients in the transplant group (54 %) than in the control group (33 %, p = 0.0295). Patients in the control group required nearly 2 times as many surgical interventions related to IBD than patients in the transplant group. Neoplasias were more common in the OLT (n = 8) compared with 4 solid organ cancers in the control group, respectively. Conclusions Our data demonstrate an overall positive impact of immunosuppression following OLT on the course of IBD, especially with mycophenolate mofetil, but an increased rate of malignancies.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e054154
Author(s):  
Marleen Bouhuys ◽  
Willem S Lexmond ◽  
Gerard Dijkstra ◽  
Triana Lobatón ◽  
Edouard Louis ◽  
...  

IntroductionAnti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy has greatly improved treatment outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but long-term use is associated with cutaneous reactions, susceptibility to infections and frequent injections or hospital visits. Several non-controlled studies have demonstrated that dose reduction is feasible for a subset of patients, provided that early detection of a disease flare is possible. Here, we aim to compare the effectiveness of interval lengthening with standard dosing in maintaining remission in young patients with IBD.Methods and analysisIn this international, prospective, non-inferiority, partially randomised patient preference trial, we aim to recruit 148 patients aged 12–25 years with luminal Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis in sustained remission (ie, three consecutive in-range faecal calprotectin (FC) results or recently confirmed endoscopic remission). In the interventional arm, the dosing interval will be lengthened from 8 to 12 weeks for infliximab users and from 2 to 3 weeks for adalimumab users. In the control group, standard dosing will be continued. Rapid tests will be performed for FC every 4 weeks and for anti-TNF trough levels every 12 weeks. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of out-of-range FC results at 48-week follow-up. Secondary endpoints include time to get out-of-range FC results, cumulative incidence of adverse effects, proportion of patients progressing to loss of response and identification of predictors of successful interval lengthening.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the University Medical Centre Groningen and is pending at the other participating centres. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.Trial registration numberEudraCT number: 2020-001811-26; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04646187. Protocol version 4, date 17 September 2021.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S241-S241
Author(s):  
M Vernero ◽  
D G Ribaldone ◽  
G Giudici ◽  
F M Stalla ◽  
C Dutto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and undetermined IBD (IBD-U), are autoimmune chronic remittent diseases affecting the gut. On the other hand celiac disease (CeD) is a gluten related disorder leading to duodenal villous atrophy. Lately, the link between CeD and IBD has become of growing interest. Indeed, CeD prevalence among IBD population has been widely investigated, as well as IBD prevalence in CeD population. Particularly, IBD seems to have a significantly higher prevalence among CeD population than in general population and CeD seems to be more prevalent in IBD population. However, there is still lack of data on whether CeD can influence IBD outcome. So, primary outcome of our study is to measure prevalence of CeD among IBD population and secondary outcome is to evaluate possible influence of CeD on IBD outcome. Methods Data were collected from march 2020 to September 2020 from IBD internal registry in San Giovanni Antica Sede Hospital in Turin. To detect CeD patients, all patients were screened and the ones with a reported duodenal lesion were selected. From those, the ones with defined diagnosis of CeD (presence of serum IgA antitransglutaminase and or IgA anti endomisial antibodies) were finally selected. Prevalence of CeD among IBD was compared to that of general population basing on literature. Then 76 patients were randomly selected as control group, in roder to investigate secondary outcome. To define IBD as complicated Siegel’s score was used (1 out of five item needed to define complicated disease). Results Among 5732 IBD patients we detected 80 patients with duodenal lesions, of whom 27 were diagnosed with CeD. So, prevalence of CeD among our population is about 0,49% whiich is similar to that of general population (0,48%, P=0.98). No differences were found in CeD prevalence among CD, UC and IBD-U subgroups. As regards secondary outcome, in case group complicated IBD was 44,4% while among control group 26,3% (p=0.08). In a mean follow up time of 133,93 months, mean time from diagnosis to complication of IBD was 58,2 months in case group and 102,7 months in control group. As shown in figure 1, Kaplan-Maier curve for event free survival comparing the two groups shows a significant difference between CeD + IBD patients and IBD only patients (p=0,002). Conclusion Even though the retrospective nature of the study could lead to underestimate CeD diagnosis, among our cohort of IBD patients CeD prevalence seems not to be significantly higher than among general population. Despite of that, when associated to CeD, IBD seems to have earlier complications, so these patients may deserve a top down therapeutical approach and/ or a more strict follow up.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S489-S490
Author(s):  
A Hernandez Camba ◽  
L Arranz ◽  
I Vera ◽  
D Carpio ◽  
M Calafat Sard ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunomodulatory drug that inhibits T and B cells, through a reversible inhibition of inositol monophosphate dehydrogenase. MMF is commonly used for prophylaxis of organ rejection after transplant. Studies to evaluate its use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited especially after the appearance of biological treatments (BT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF in IBD. Methods IBD patients who had received MMF were identified in the ENEIDA registry (prospective database of GETECCU). Patients with Crohn′s disease (CD) or Ulcerative colitis (UC) in whom oral MMF was prescribed for this condition were evaluated. Demographic and IBD clinical data were collected. Clinical activity was assessed through Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) and partial Mayo score (pMS); C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) were reviewed at baseline (at MMF starting), 3 and 6 months and at the end of follow-up (at MMF stopping or the last visit while on MMF). Adverse events (AEs) during MMF treatment were documented. Statistical analyses were performed by descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests. Results Between June 1999 and November 2018 a total of 83 patients received MMF (mean age 36.4 (SD12.3) years; 52F/31M; 66 CD and 17 UC). Indication for MMF use was maintenance of remission (50%), induction of remission (44%) and post-surgical prophylaxis (6%). Mean MMF dose used was 1269.8 (SD 741) mg/day. In 61% of cases, systemic steroids were administered starting MMF and it was used concomitantly to BT in 27% of patients. In CD, statistically significant differences in HBI at 6 months (mean 5.9 (SD 4.8), p = 0.04) and at the end of follow-up (mean 5.7 (SD 5), p = 0.014) compared with baseline (mean 7.6 (SD 4.3)) were observed. In UC, statistically significant differences in pMS at 6 months (mean 2.1 (SD 2.7), p = 0.018) and at the end of follow-up (mean 1.8 (SD 2.6), p = 0.003) compared with baseline (mean 4.8 (SD 2.5)) were determined. No significant differences in CRP or CF values during follow-up were observed. Concomitant use of BT was significantly associated with clinical response (OR 1.36 95% CI 1.08–1.73). MMF was maintained for a median time of 28.9 months (IQR 20.4–37.5) and was stopped in 84% of patients due to lack of response (50%), loss of response (17%) and remission (15%). Overall, 23% of patients presented MMF-related AEs (60% abdominal pain). MMF was withdrawn in 11% of patients due to AEs. Conclusion MMFshows a clinical benefit in the long term in both CD and UC patients with a favourable safety profile. MMF could be a treatment option alone or in combination with biologics in patients with IBD in clinical practice.


Author(s):  
Roxana Mardare ◽  
Natasha Burgess ◽  
Dominic Studart ◽  
Protima Deb ◽  
Marco Gasparetto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100337
Author(s):  
Vivek Ashok Rudrapatna ◽  
Benjamin Scott Glicksberg ◽  
Atul Janardhan Butte

ObjectivesElectronic health records (EHR) are receiving growing attention from regulators, biopharmaceuticals and payors as a potential source of real-world evidence. However, their suitability for the study of diseases with complex activity measures is unclear. We sought to evaluate the use of EHR data for estimating treatment effectiveness in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), using tofacitinib as a use case.MethodsRecords from the University of California, San Francisco (6/2012 to 4/2019) were queried to identify tofacitinib-treated IBD patients. Disease activity variables at baseline and follow-up were manually abstracted according to a preregistered protocol. The proportion of patients meeting the endpoints of recent randomised trials in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) was assessed.Results86 patients initiated tofacitinib. Baseline characteristics of the real-world and trial cohorts were similar, except for universal failure of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the former. 54% (UC) and 62% (CD) of patients had complete capture of disease activity at baseline (month −6 to 0), while only 32% (UC) and 69% (CD) of patients had complete follow-up data (month 2 to 8). Using data imputation, we estimated the proportion achieving the trial primary endpoints as being similar to the published estimates for both UC (16%, p value=0.5) and CD (38%, p-value=0.8).Discussion/ConclusionThis pilot study reproduced trial-based estimates of tofacitinib efficacy despite its use in a different cohort but revealed substantial missingness in routinely collected data. Future work is needed to strengthen EHR data and enable real-world evidence in complex diseases like IBD.


Author(s):  
Christopher X. W. Tan ◽  
Henk S. Brand ◽  
Bilgin Kalender ◽  
Nanne K. H. De Boer ◽  
Tymour Forouzanfar ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Although bowel symptoms are often predominant, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients can have several oral manifestations. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of dental caries and periodontal disease in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) compared to an age and gender-matched control group of patients without IBD. Material and methods The DMFT (Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth) scores and the DPSI (Dutch Periodontal Screening Index) of 229 IBD patients were retrieved from the electronic health record patient database axiUm at the Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) and were compared to the DMFT scores and DPSI from age and gender-matched non-IBD patients from the same database. Results The total DMFT index was significantly higher in the IBD group compared to the control group. When CD and UC were analyzed separately, a statistically significant increased DMFT index was observed in CD patients but not in UC patients. The DPSI did not differ significantly between the IBD and non-IBD groups for each of the sextants. However, in every sextant, IBD patients were more frequently edentulous compared to the control patients. Conclusion CD patients have significantly more dental health problems compared to a control group. Periodontal disease did not differ significantly between IBD and non-IBD groups as determined by the DPSI. Clinical relevance It is important that IBD patients and physicians are instructed about the correlation between their disease and oral health problems. Strict oral hygiene and preventive dental care such as more frequent checkups should be emphasized by dental clinicians.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 201-202
Author(s):  
Z Chattha ◽  
R Chattha ◽  
S Reza ◽  
M Moradshahi ◽  
M Fadida ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The relationship between older age and extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unknown. Aims This study aims to determine whether older age is associated with increased risk of EIMs in IBD patients. Methods This was a retrospective study of IBD patients seen at the McMaster University Medical Centre, in Hamilton, ON, Canada from 2012–2020. Patients were identified to have the primary outcome of interest if their gastroenterologist documented the presence of any EIM either during the baseline assessment or during the period of follow up. The independent variable, age at start of follow-up, was dichotomized into two categories age >=40 vs. <40.Prior knowledge in combination with forward selection was used to develop a logistic regression model. The variables utilized for the forward selection model included gender, disease duration, and current biologic use. Results A total of 995 IBD patients (625 with CD) were considered for the regression analysis, all for whom the EIM status was recorded. Out of the 995 patients, 270 patients reported at least one EIM – 99 with arthritis/arthralgia, 79 with dermatologic manifestations, 16 with ophthalmic manifestations, 30 with liver manifestations, and 116 with other EIMs. A univariate regression analysis foundincreased odds of EIMs in older patientsas compared to younger patients (odds ratio (OR) 1.41 (95% CI, 1.05 – 1.89)). In the multivariate regression analysis, current biologic use was found to have a significant relationship with odds of having EIMs (OR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.06 – 2.09). After adjustment for biologic use, patients aged 40 or over had 1.46 times higher odds of having EIMs (95% CI 1.03 – 2.05). A sub-analysis of individual EIM categoriesdid not show a significant association with older age. Conclusions Older age is associated with increased risk of EIMs in IBD patients. Patients with EIMs were also more likely to be treated with biological therapies. Clinicians should inquire about the presence of EIMs in older IBD patients. Funding Agencies None


Gut ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Waterman ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Amreen Dinani ◽  
A Hillary Steinhart ◽  
Kenneth Croitoru ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document