Injuries in Austrian football players: Are they an issue?

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (01) ◽  
pp. 43-50
Author(s):  
Felix Fischer ◽  
Christian Hoser ◽  
Cornelia Blank ◽  
Wolfgang Schobersberger ◽  
Caroline Hepperger ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose and Hypothesis With its load characteristics, the team sport of football places high physical demands on players and thus is associated with a high risk of injury. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to collect information about injuries suffered by football players in Austria during training or matches to enable participating clubs to learn about injuries. Methods One hundred and forty-five players from seven teams with age ranging from 16 to 38 years participated in this prospective study during the 2015/16 season. Injury surveillance was conducted according to the consensus statement of Fuller et al. (2006). Results During the period of study, a total of 83 injuries were recorded, which represents an overall incidence of 4.5 injuries/1000 hours (2.3 injuries/1000 hours in training and 14.2 injuries/1000 hours of match play). There was a significant difference for older age in injured players compared to non-injured players (p = 0.019). No differences in BMI were detected (p = 0.427). Ninety-four percent of all injuries occurred in the lower extremity, with the thigh (25.8 %), ankle (19.3 %) and knee (13.3 %) being the major locations of injuries. Muscle tendon injuries were the most common non-contact injuries (78.9 %). Conclusion Lower extremity injuries are the most common injury in Austrian football. The incidence of muscle injuries is high, especially injuries of the posterior thigh. There are promising preventive strategies for the most common injury types. The implementation of these strategies is essential in order to reduce the incidence or recurrence of these football injuries.

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 839-844
Author(s):  
Parisa Namazi ◽  
Mostafa Zarei ◽  
Hamed Abbasi ◽  
Fariborz Hovanloo ◽  
Nikki Rommers ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0004
Author(s):  
Norman Waldrop ◽  
Lyle Cain ◽  
Benton Emblom ◽  
Michael Ryan

Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: Return to sport criteria after surgical treatment of lower extremity injuries are highly variable and without consensus. Thigh measurements assessing atrophy, single-leg hop testing and isokinetic strength measurements are commonly used metrics when considering return to sport after surgical treatment of lower-extremity injuries. Yet, these modalities are limited in scope, as they do not fully or accurately evaluate functional movements required in elite athletics. Alternatively, using new Global Positioning System (GPS) technology, a wide breadth of functional movements can be tracked for each athlete, which can be used as a comparative self-control in the event of an injury. This data proposes a more comprehensive, dynamic and longitudinal comparison of athlete performance, which may more accurately reflect functional return to sport in elite athletes after surgery. Methods: Over a three-year period, GPS data was collected on thirteen elite American College Football players at a single FBS Subdivision University. A total of 300 data points per athlete were collected for every practice, scrimmage and game starting in spring prep and extending through regular season, and post-season play. A total of 5.7 million data points including total distance traveled, average and maximum velocity, acceleration profiles, and explosive change of direction through inertial movement analysis were prospectively collected and analyzed. Individual pre-injury GPS functional profiles for each of the thirteen athletes were used as baseline, healthy comparisons, and functional recovery was determined prospectively during return to play progression after lower extremity surgery. Return to sport was allowed when post-operative GPS profiles demonstrated equivalence or superiority of all parameters compared to pre-injury measurements. Results: All thirteen players returned to sport after all measured parameters were equal to or greater than pre-injury levels. Conclusion: Modern GPS technology employed during preseason, regular season and post-season establishes an individualized, baseline, profile of lower-extremity function which allows for postoperative comparison and prospective assessment of safe return to play in elite football players.


2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 645.1-645
Author(s):  
A Nilstad ◽  
TE Andersen ◽  
R Bahr ◽  
IM Holme ◽  
K Steffen

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-788
Author(s):  
Mattias Eckerman ◽  
Kjell Svensson ◽  
Gunnar Edman ◽  
Marie Alricsson

Context: The physical and mental demands of an elite football player are complex, which may explain why injuries are common in football. At elite level, muscle injuries of the lower-extremity are the most common among male football players, and the research hitherto is limited. Objective: To investigate whether personality traits affect the incidence of muscle injuries among male football players from the first league in Sweden. Design: Prospective cohort study. Participants: A male football team from the first league in Sweden was prospectively followed, in terms of muscle injuries of the lower-extremity during 8 seasons, between 2007 and 2015. Intervention: All muscle injuries included in this study were evaluated and diagnosed with ultrasonography. Players from the team filled out the Swedish Universities Scales of Personality questionnaire. Swedish Universities Scales of Personality questionnaire consists of 91 items and is divided into 13 categories. Main Outcome Measures: The raw values of each scale were linearly transformed to T scores, having a mean (SD) of 50 (10). All variables were summarized with standard descriptive statistics, such as frequency, mean, and SD. As data were of interval scale and no variable distribution was severely skewed, differences between noninjured players, rarely injured players, and frequently injured players were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance with post hoc tests by Tukey honestly significant difference test. Results: No significant difference in personality traits were observed between noninjured players, rarely injured players, and frequently injured players regarding number of muscle injuries (P > .05). However, a trend (P = .07) was seen, where frequently injured players scored higher on stress susceptibility than rarely injured players. Conclusion: A player’s stress susceptibility should be taken into consideration by the player, coaches, and medical staff when assessing the risk of a muscle injury. Also, preventive measures available for these players may need to be considered.


2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (16) ◽  
pp. 1047-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnhild Bakken ◽  
Stephen Targett ◽  
Tone Bere ◽  
Cristiano Eirale ◽  
Abdulaziz Farooq ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe 9+ screening battery test consists of 11 tests to assess limitations in functional movement.AimTo examine the association of the 9+ with lower extremity injuries and to identify a cut-off point to predict injury risk.MethodsProfessional male football players in Qatar from 14 teams completed the 9+ at the beginning of the 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 seasons. Time-loss injuries and exposure in training and matches were registered prospectively by club medical staff during these seasons. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to calculate HR and 95% CI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to determine sensitivity and specificity and identify the optimal cut-off point for risk assessment.Results362 players completed the 9+ and had injury and exposure registration. There were 526 injuries among 203 players (56.1%) during the two seasons; injuries to the thigh were the most frequent. There was no association between 9+ total score and the risk of lower extremity injuries (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.05, p=0.13), even after adjusting for other risk factors in a multivariate analysis (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04, p=0.37). ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.48, and there was no cut-off point that distinguished injured from non-injured players.ConclusionThe 9+ was not associated with lower extremity injury, and it was no better than chance for distinguishing between injured and uninjured players. Therefore, the 9+ test cannot be recommended as an injury prediction tool in this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document