Newer Avenues in the Monitoring of Antithrombotic Therapy: The Role of Automation

1983 ◽  
Vol 9 (04) ◽  
pp. 340-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanine Walenga ◽  
Jawed Fareed ◽  
Harry Messmore
2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (02) ◽  
pp. 229-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Spronk ◽  
T. Padro ◽  
J. Siland ◽  
J. Prochaska ◽  
J. Winters ◽  
...  

AbstractAtherothrombosis is a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality and long-term morbidity. Platelets and coagulation proteases, interacting with circulating cells and in different vascular beds, modify several complex pathologies including atherosclerosis. In the second Maastricht Consensus Conference on Thrombosis, this theme was addressed by diverse scientists from bench to bedside. All presentations were discussed with audience members and the results of these discussions were incorporated in the final document that presents a state-of-the-art reflection of expert opinions and consensus recommendations regarding the following five topics: 1. Risk factors, biomarkers and plaque instability: In atherothrombosis research, more focus on the contribution of specific risk factors like ectopic fat needs to be considered; definitions of atherothrombosis are important distinguishing different phases of disease, including plaque (in)stability; proteomic and metabolomics data are to be added to genetic information. 2. Circulating cells including platelets and atherothrombosis: Mechanisms of leukocyte and macrophage plasticity, migration, and transformation in murine atherosclerosis need to be considered; disease mechanism-based biomarkers need to be identified; experimental systems are needed that incorporate whole-blood flow to understand how red blood cells influence thrombus formation and stability; knowledge on platelet heterogeneity and priming conditions needs to be translated toward the in vivo situation. 3. Coagulation proteases, fibrin(ogen) and thrombus formation: The role of factor (F) XI in thrombosis including the lower margins of this factor related to safe and effective antithrombotic therapy needs to be established; FXI is a key regulator in linking platelets, thrombin generation, and inflammatory mechanisms in a renin–angiotensin dependent manner; however, the impact on thrombin-dependent PAR signaling needs further study; the fundamental mechanisms in FXIII biology and biochemistry and its impact on thrombus biophysical characteristics need to be explored; the interactions of red cells and fibrin formation and its consequences for thrombus formation and lysis need to be addressed. Platelet–fibrin interactions are pivotal determinants of clot formation and stability with potential therapeutic consequences. 4. Preventive and acute treatment of atherothrombosis and arterial embolism; novel ways and tailoring? The role of protease-activated receptor (PAR)-4 vis à vis PAR-1 as target for antithrombotic therapy merits study; ongoing trials on platelet function test-based antiplatelet therapy adjustment support development of practically feasible tests; risk scores for patients with atrial fibrillation need refinement, taking new biomarkers including coagulation into account; risk scores that consider organ system differences in bleeding may have added value; all forms of oral anticoagulant treatment require better organization, including education and emergency access; laboratory testing still needs rapidly available sensitive tests with short turnaround time. 5. Pleiotropy of coagulation proteases, thrombus resolution and ischaemia–reperfusion: Biobanks specifically for thrombus storage and analysis are needed; further studies on novel modified activated protein C–based agents are required including its cytoprotective properties; new avenues for optimizing treatment of patients with ischaemic stroke are needed, also including novel agents that modify fibrinolytic activity (aimed at plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor.


2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 1352-1356
Author(s):  
Dion Stub ◽  
Himawan Fernando ◽  
James D. McFadyen ◽  
Jathushan Palasubramaniam ◽  
James Shaw ◽  
...  

AbstractThere have been numerous and intriguing advancements in antithrombotic therapy for myocardial infarction since it was described in the earliest issues of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. In this article, we revisit historical breakthroughs and describe the four most challenging contemporary themes relating to antithrombotic therapy in myocardial infarction. In all four, the challenge is to find the best balance of reducing specific levels of ischaemic risks without increasing bleeding risk. The first is the question of the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This includes discussion of monotherapy after a period of DAPT. The second relates to the role of genotype and phenotype-guided individualisation of antiplatelet therapy. There is emerging evidence for a role of pheno/genotyping in identifying individuals at high risk for recurrent ischaemic events or in guiding the timing of cardiac surgery for patients on DAPT. The third addresses the increasing evidence for dual pathway inhibition, for example, with rivaroxaban in addition to aspirin in patients where high ischaemic and low bleeding risk is demonstrated. Finally the fourth highlights the challenge of the most appropriate combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy for patients with known atrial fibrillation after PCI. In most individuals, oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy combined with a direct acting oral anticoagulant appears to be the best strategy based on the available evidence. Overall, the progress in antithrombotic therapy achieved over the last seven decades is remarkable, however, there are important issues to address and progress still to be made.


2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (11) ◽  
pp. 1594-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Chaudhary ◽  
Rolf P. Kreutz ◽  
Kevin P. Bliden ◽  
Udaya S. Tantry ◽  
Paul A. Gurbel

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (23) ◽  
pp. 2762-2768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia Vogiatzi ◽  
Antonios Pantazis ◽  
Dimitris Tousoulis

: Cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of heart muscle diseases and important cause of heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Although there is an increasing body of evidence on the incidence, pathophysiology, and natural history of heart failure (HF) in cardiomyopathies, certain aspects of the therapeutic strategies remain unclear. More particularly, there is no consensus if to whether antithrombotic therapy has a favorable risk: benefit ratio in reducing thromboembolic event rate in patients with cardiomyopathies without suffering from primary valvular disease or atrial fibrillation. Although the observational data on increased venous thromboembolic risk are supported by multiple pathophysiological mechanisms, the role of antithrombotic therapy in these patients remains unclear. This review article provides an overview of epidemiologic, pathophysiologic, clinical, and therapeutic data for the prevention of thromboembolism in heart failure due to cardiomyopathies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document