The Importance of Specialist Treatment, Treatment Satisfaction and Diabetes Education for the Compliance of Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes - Results from a Population-based Survey

2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (02) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Arnold-Wörner ◽  
R. Holle ◽  
W. Rathmann ◽  
A. Mielck
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Reynoso-Noverón ◽  
Roopa Mehta ◽  
Paloma Almeda-Valdes ◽  
Rosalba Rojas-Martinez ◽  
Salvador Villalpando ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne F. Awad ◽  
Peijue Huangfu ◽  
Soha R. Dargham ◽  
Kamel Ajlouni ◽  
Anwar Batieha ◽  
...  

AbstractWe aimed to characterize the type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) epidemic and the role of key risk factors in Jordan between 1990–2050, and to forecast the T2DM-related costs. A recently-developed population-level T2DM mathematical model was adapted and applied to Jordan. The model was fitted to six population-based survey data collected between 1990 and 2017. T2DM prevalence was 14.0% in 1990, and projected to be 16.0% in 2020, and 20.6% in 2050. The total predicted number of T2DM cases were 218,326 (12,313 were new cases) in 1990, 702,326 (36,941 were new cases) in 2020, and 1.9 million (79,419 were new cases) in 2050. Out of Jordan’s total health expenditure, 19.0% in 1990, 21.1% in 2020, and 25.2% in 2050 was forecasted to be spent on T2DM. The proportion of T2DM incident cases attributed to obesity was 55.6% in 1990, 59.5% in 2020, and 62.6% in 2050. Meanwhile, the combined contribution of smoking and physical inactivity hovered around 5% between 1990 and 2050. Jordan’s T2DM epidemic is predicted to grow sizably in the next three decades, driven by population ageing and high and increasing obesity levels. The national strategy to prevent T2DM needs to be strengthened by focusing it on preventive interventions targeting T2DM and key risk factors.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Lawrenson ◽  
Grace Joshy ◽  
Yoska Eerens ◽  
Wayne Johnstone

INTRODUCTION: Education is accepted as the mainstay of management for people with diabetes. However, there are few population-based studies describing what education has been delivered from the patient’s perspective. AIM: To ascertain the sources of education for patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes; what education was received and what were the patients’ views of group education. Delivery of education to Maori was compared with non-Maori. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of patients identified from the Waikato Regional Diabetes Service database. Patients identified in one calendar year, having a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and being aged between 20 and 89 years were included in the survey. Patients were sent a four-page questionnaire. Non-responders were followed up by telephone. RESULTS: 333/667 patients (50%) responded. The principal source of education for Waikato patients was general practice, from the general practitioner and/or the practice nurse. Ninety-three percent of patients reported that they had received some education about diabetes at the time of diagnosis. There was no difference between Maori and non-Maori in the reported levels of diabetes education received, but the patient perceived knowledge score was significantly lower for Maori in all aspects studied. DISCUSSION: The overall impression was that patients were receiving appropriate information about diabetes, but there does appear to be room for improvement in some areas, particularly the importance of blood pressure and lipid control. We believe that further research on the educational needs of Maori and ethnic minorities is needed. KEYWORDS: Diabetes; family practice; education; New Zealand


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document