Medical abortion: Public health and private lives

2000 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. S1-S2 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Grimes
Author(s):  
Deborah B Doroshow

Abstract In the late 1930s, states began to pass laws requiring men and women applying for marriage licences to demonstrate proof of a blood test showing that they did not harbour communicable syphilis. Advocates of the laws positioned marriage as a public health checkpoint to identify new cases of syphilis as part of a broader effort to approach the disease as a public health problem, rather than a moral one. Although the laws appeared to have broad popular support, in reality they were a failed public health intervention. Couples rushed to the altar before laws went into effect and border-hopped to marry in states without blood test laws. The blood tests used to detect syphilis were difficult to interpret and physicians could not agree on a standard definition of communicable disease. But for over 30 years, premarital examination laws represented a tangible government presence in the private lives of most Americans.


1996 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. BRAZIER ◽  
J. HARRIS
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 295-316
Author(s):  
Margaret Brazier ◽  
John Harris
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. S72-S72
Author(s):  
P. Sanhueza ◽  
B. Winikoff ◽  
J. Morales ◽  
R. Schiavon

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjsrh-2020-200724
Author(s):  
Caroline Moreau ◽  
Mridula Shankar ◽  
Anna Glasier ◽  
Sharon Cameron ◽  
Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson

BackgroundUnprecedented public health actions restricting movement and non-COVID related health services are likely to have affected abortion care during the pandemic in Europe. In the absence of a common approach to ensure access to this essential health service, we sought to describe the variability of abortion policies during the outbreak in Europe in order to identify strategies that improve availability and access to abortion in times of public health crises.MethodsWe collected information from 46 countries/regions: 31 for which country-experts completed a survey and 15 for which we conducted a desk review. We describe abortion regulations and changes to regulations and practice during the pandemic.ResultsDuring COVID-19, abortions were banned in six countries and suspended in one. Surgical abortion was less available due to COVID-19 in 12 countries/regions and services were not available or delayed for women with COVID-19 symptoms in eleven. No country expanded its gestational limit for abortion. Changes during COVID-19, mostly designed to reduce in-person consultations, occurred in 13 countries/regions. Altogether eight countries/regions provided home medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol beyond 9 weeks (from 9 weeks+6 days to 11 weeks+6 days) and 13 countries/regions up to 9 weeks (in some instances only misoprostol could be taken at home). Only six countries/regions offered abortion by telemedicine.ConclusionsThe lack of a unified policy response to COVID-19 restrictions has widened inequities in abortion access in Europe, but some innovations including telemedicine deployed during the outbreak could serve as a catalyst to ensure continuity and equity of abortion care.


Author(s):  
Lucia Fontanelli Sulekova ◽  
Martina Spaziante ◽  
Serena Vita ◽  
Paola Zuccalà ◽  
Valentina Mazzocato ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Migration has a significant impact on overall health and pregnancy outcome. Despite the fact that growing volume of migration flows significantly engaging the public health system of European host countries, there is a lack of evidence concerning pregnancy outcomes of newly arrived asylum-seeking women. Methods Data about pregnant asylum seekers hosted in the Italian Reception Centers between the 1 st June 2016 and the 1st June 2018 were retrospectively collected and analysed in the present study. We examined the following pregnancy outcomes: miscarriage, self-induced abortion, voluntary pregnancy termination, live-birth; and studied potentially related socio-demographic factors. Results Out of the 110 pregnant women living in the reception centers, 44 (40%) had eutocic delivery, 8 (7.3%) dystocic delivery, 15 (13.6%) miscarriage, 17 (15.5%) self-induced abortion and 26 (23.6%) underwent voluntary pregnancy termination. Nigerian women were at a significantly higher risk of abortive outcomes for voluntary pregnancy termination (p < 0.001), miscarriage (p = 0.049) and self-induced abortion (p < 0.001). Being unmarried was significantly associated with voluntary pregnancy termination and self-induced abortion. Women who chose to undergo unsafe abortion did not result to have significantly lower educational levels, compared to women who preferred medical abortion. Conclusion This study offers first insights into pregnancy outcomes among asylum-seeking women in Italy. The country of origin and marital status seem to significantly impact on pregnancy outcome. We identified sub-groups of migrant women at increased risk of abortive outcomes, and highlight the need to improve care in order to promote migrant women’s reproductive health.


1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Terrey Oliver Penn ◽  
Susan E. Abbott

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document