Difference of Spatial Frequency Selectivity between Static and Flicker Motion Aftereffects

Perception ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1313-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ashida ◽  
Naoyuki Osaka
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Test Stimulus ◽  
Motion Aftereffect ◽  
Frequency Selectivity ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Early Processing ◽  
Motion Aftereffects

The strength of motion aftereffect (MAE) was measured with the use of sinusoidal gratings of several spatial frequencies, to examine the spatial frequency selectivity of two types of MAE. With ordinary static grating as a test stimulus, to measure ‘static MAE’, the maximum aftereffect for each adapting spatial frequency was obtained at the testing stimuli of the same spatial frequency, showing spatial frequency selectivity. However, in the case when the sinusoidally flickering grating was used as a test stimulus, to measure ‘flicker MAE’, no spatial frequency selectivity was observed. The two types of MAE were considered to be based on different mechanisms. Static MAE is thought to depend on the spatiotemporal channel mechanism in the early processing stages, whereas flicker MAE might reflect higher-level processes which might occur at the extrastriate regions.

Temporal and Spatial Frequency Tuning of the Flicker Motion Aftereffect

Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
P J Bex ◽  
F A J Verstraten ◽  
I Mareschal
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Motion Aftereffect ◽  
Sine Wave ◽  
Test Grating ◽  
Spatial Frequency Tuning ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Sine Wave Gratings

The motion aftereffect (MAE) was used to study the temporal-frequency and spatial-frequency selectivity of the visual system at suprathreshold contrasts. Observers adapted to drifting sine-wave gratings of a range of spatial and temporal frequencies. The magnitude of the MAE induced by the adaptation was measured with counterphasing test gratings of a variety of spatial and temporal frequencies. Independently of the spatial or temporal frequency of the adapting grating, the largest MAE was found with slowly counterphasing test gratings (∼0.125 – 0.25 Hz). For slowly counterphasing test gratings (<∼2 Hz), the largest MAEs were found when the test grating was of similar spatial frequency to that of the adapting grating, even at very low spatial frequencies (0.125 cycle deg−1). However, such narrow spatial frequency tuning was lost when the temporal frequency of the test grating was increased. The data suggest that MAEs are dominated by a single, low-pass temporal-frequency mechanism and by a series of band-pass spatial-frequency mechanisms at low temporal frequencies. At higher test temporal frequencies, the loss of spatial-frequency tuning implicates separate mechanisms with broader spatial frequency tuning.

The Effect of Spatial Frequency and Contrast on Visual Persistence

Perception ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 529-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Bowling ◽  
William Lovegrove ◽  
Barry Mapperson
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual Persistence ◽  
Published Data ◽  
High Contrast ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings

The visual persistence of sinusoidal gratings of varying spatial frequency and contrast was measured. It was found that the persistence of low-contrast gratings was longer than that of high-contrast stimuli for all spatial frequencies investigated. At higher contrast levels of 1 and 4 cycles deg−1 gratings, a tendency for persistence to be independent of contrast was observed. For 12 cycles deg−1 gratings, however, persistence continued to decrease with increasing contrast. These results are compared with recently published data on other temporal responses, and are discussed in terms of the different properties of sustained and transient channels.

Contrast adaptation in retinal and cortical evoked potentials: No adaptation to low spatial frequencies

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
THOMAS STEPHAN HEINRICH ◽  
MICHAEL BACH
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Opposite Effect ◽  
Pattern Electroretinogram ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Contrast Adaptation ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Cross Adaptation

Contrast adaptation occurs in both the retina and the cortex. Defining its spatial dependence is crucial for understanding its potential roles. We thus asked to what degree contrast adaptation depends on spatial frequency, including cross-adaptation. Measuring the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and the visual evoked potential (VEP) allowed separating retinal and cortical contributions. In ten subjects we recorded simultaneous PERGs and VEPs. Test stimuli were sinusoidal gratings of 98% contrast with spatial frequencies of 0.5 or 5.0 cpd, phase reversing at 17 reversals/s. Adaptation was controlled by prolonged presentation of these test stimuli or homogenous gray fields of the same luminance. When adaptation and test frequency were identical, we observed significant contrast adaptation only at 5 cpd: an amplitude reduction in the PERG (−22%) and VEP (−58%), and an effective reduction of latency in the PERG (−0.95 ms). When adapting at 5 cpd and testing at 0.5 cpd, the opposite effect was observed: enhancement of VEP amplitude by +26% and increase in effective PERG latency by +1.35 ms. When adapting at 0.5 cpd and testing at 5 cpd, there was no significant amplitude change in PERG and VEP, but a small effective PERG latency increase of +0.65 ms. The 0.5-cpd channel was not adapted by spatial frequencies of 0.5 cpd. The adaptability of the 5-cpd channel may mediate improved detail recognition after prolonged blur. The existence of both adaptable and nonadaptable mechanisms in the retina allows for the possibility that by comparing the adaptational state of spatial-frequency channels the retina can discern between overall low contrast and defocus in emmetropization control.

Direction-sensitive X and Y cells within the A laminae of the cat's LGNd

1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 927-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk G. Thompson ◽  
Yifeng Zhou ◽  
Audie G. Leventhal
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Preferred Orientation ◽  
General Direction ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
X And Y Cells ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Direction Sensitivity ◽  
Y Cells

AbstractDrifting sinusoidal gratings, moving bars, and moving spots were employed to study the direction sensitivity of 425 neurons in the A laminae of the cat's LGNd. Thirty-two percent of X- and Y-type LGNd relay cells exhibit significant direction sensitivity when tested with drifting sinusoidal gratings. X and Y cells exhibit the same degree of direction sensitivity. Moving spots and bars elicit direction specific responses from LGNd cells that are consistent with those elicited when drifting sinusoidal gratings are employed. For cells that are both orientation and direction sensitive, the preferred direction tends to be orthogonal to the preferred orientation. In general, direction sensitivity is strongest at relatively low spatial frequencies, well below the spatial-frequency cutoff for the cell. The presence of significant numbers of direction-sensitive LGNd cells raises the possibility that subcortical direction specificity is important for the generation of this property in the visual cortex.

Right-Hemisphere Superiority in the Discrimination of Spatial Phase

Perception ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 695-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Fiorentini ◽  
Nicoletta Berardi
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Frequency Discrimination ◽  
High Contrast ◽  
Spatial Phase ◽  
Phase Discrimination ◽  
Visual Hemifield ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
The Right

Visual field differences have been investigated in various detection and discrimination tasks for simple sinusoidal gratings or for complex gratings composed of two sinusoids of spatial frequencies f and 3 f. Sinusoidal gratings were employed to evaluate contrast sensitivity, subthreshold summation effects, aftereffects of adaptation to a high-contrast grating, and spatial-frequency discrimination. The tasks with complex gratings were detection of the 3 f component in the presence of a high-contrast f component and spatial-phase discrimination. The stimuli were presented either in the left or in the right visual hemifield. The results indicate a lack of lateralization for detection and spatial-frequency discrimination of sinusoidal gratings, and for the bandwidth of subthreshold summation effects and adaptation aftereffects, whereas the detection of the 3 f component in the presence of a high-contrast f component, as well as spatial-phase discrimination of f + 3 f gratings, show a left-field advantage. This suggests a right-hemisphere superiority in the processing of spatial phase.

Orientation and Direction Tuning of Goldfish Ganglion Cells

1989 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Bilotta ◽  
Israel Abramov
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Direction Tuning

AbstractOrientation and direction tuning were examined in goldfish ganglion cells by drifting sinusoidal gratings across the receptive field of the cell. Each ganglion cell was first classified as X-, Y- or W-like based on its responses to a contrast-reversal grating positioned at various spatial phases of the cell's receptive field. Sinusoidal gratings were drifted at different orientations and directions across the receptive field of the cell; spatial frequency and contrast of the grating were also varied. It was found that some X-like cells responded similarly to all orientations and directions, indicating that these cells had circular and symmetrical fields. Other X-like cells showed a preference for certain orientations at high spatial frequencies suggesting that these cells possess an elliptical center mechanism (since only the center mechanism is sensitive to high spatial frequencies). In virtually all cases, X-like cells were not directionally tuned. All but one Y-like cell displayed orientation tuning but, as with X-like cells, orientation tuning appeared only at high spatial frequencies. A substantial portion of these Y-like cells also showed a direction preference. This preference was dependent on spatial frequency but in a manner different from orientation tuning, suggesting that these two phenomena result from different mechanisms. All W-like cells possessed orientation and direction tuning, both of which depended on the spatial frequency of the stimulus. These results support past work which suggests that the center and surround components of retinal ganglion cell receptive fields are not necessarily circular or concentric, and that they may actually consist of smaller subareas.

scholarly journals The “Spinner” Illusion: More Dots, More Speed?

i-Perception ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 204166951770797
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ashida ◽  
Alan Ho ◽  
Akiyoshi Kitaoka ◽  
Stuart Anstis
Keyword(s):  
Test Stimulus ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Angular Speed ◽  
Circular Path ◽  
Reference Stimulus ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Speed Perception ◽  
Perceived Speed

The perceived speed of a ring of equally spaced dots moving around a circular path appears faster as the number of dots increases (Ho & Anstis, 2013, Best Illusion of the Year contest). We measured this “spinner” effect with radial sinusoidal gratings, using a 2AFC procedure where participants selected the faster one between two briefly presented gratings of different spatial frequencies (SFs) rotating at various angular speeds. Compared with the reference stimulus with 4 c/rev (0.64 c/rad), participants consistently overestimated the angular speed for test stimuli of higher radial SFs but underestimated that for a test stimulus of lower radial SFs. The spinner effect increased in magnitude but saturated rapidly as the test radial SF increased. Similar effects were observed with translating linear sinusoidal gratings of different SFs. Our results support the idea that human speed perception is biased by temporal frequency, which physically goes up as SF increases when the speed is held constant. Hence, the more dots or lines, the greater the perceived speed when they are moving coherently in a defined area.

scholarly journals Spatial and Temporal Selectivity of Translational Glass Patterns Assessed With the Tilt After-Effect

i-Perception ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 204166952110179
Author(s):  
Andrea Pavan ◽  
Adriano Contillo ◽  
Filippo Ghin ◽  
Rita Donato ◽  
Matthew J. Foxwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Frequency Selectivity ◽  
Frequency Content ◽  
Global Orientation ◽  
Global Form ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
After Effect ◽  
Glass Patterns

Glass patterns (GPs) have been widely employed to investigate the mechanisms underlying processing of global form from locally oriented cues. The current study aimed to psychophysically investigate the level at which global orientation is extracted from translational GPs using the tilt after-effect (TAE) and manipulating the spatiotemporal properties of the adapting pattern. We adapted participants to translational GPs and tested with sinewave gratings. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether orientation-selective units are sensitive to the temporal frequency of the adapting GP. We used static and dynamic translational GPs, with dynamic GPs refreshed at different temporal frequencies. In Experiment 2, we investigated the spatial frequency selectivity of orientation-selective units by manipulating the spatial frequency content of the adapting GPs. The results showed that the TAE peaked at a temporal frequency of ∼30 Hz, suggesting that orientation-selective units responding to translational GPs are sensitive to high temporal frequencies. In addition, TAE from translational GPs peaked at lower spatial frequencies than the dipoles’ spatial constant. These effects are consistent with form-motion integration at low and intermediate levels of visual processing.

Spatiospectral properties of goldfish retinal ganglion cells

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1140-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bilotta ◽  
I. Abramov
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Relative Sensitivity ◽  
Sinusoidal Grating ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Center Cell

1. Responses of single ganglion cells from isolated goldfish retinas were recorded during presentation of various spatial and spectral stimuli. Each cell was classified along several spatial [spatial summation class, spatial contrast sensitivity function (CSF), and response to contrast] and spectral (Red-ON, Red-OFF or Red-ON/OFF, and spectral opponency/nonopponency) dimensions. 2. Linearity of spatial summation was determined from responses to contrast-reversal sinusoidal gratings positioned at various locations across the receptive field of the cell. CSFs were derived from responses to sinusoidal gratings of various spatial frequencies and contrasts, drifting across the cell's receptive field at a rate of 4 Hz. Response to contrast was determined from responses to variations in contrast of a sinusoidal grating of optimal spatial frequency. Spectral classifications were based on responses to monochromatic stimuli presented separately to the center and surround portions of the receptive field. 3. Linearity of spatial summation (X-, Y-, and W-like) was independent of the cell's spectral properties; for example, an X-like cell could be classified as either a Red-ON, Red-OFF, or Red-ON/OFF center cell and as spectrally opponent or nonopponent. 4. There were differences in response to contrast across spectral categories. Red-OFF center cells were very sensitive to contrast compared with Red-ON center cells. Spectrally nonopponent cells were more responsive to contrast than spectrally opponent cells. 5. There were dramatic differences across the spectral categories in relative sensitivity to low spatial frequency stimuli; however, the spatial resolution (i.e., sensitivity to high spatial frequencies) of each spectral classification appeared to be similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

scholarly journals Numerical Simulation on Spatial-Frequency Domain Imaging for Estimating Optical Absorption and Scattering Properties of Two-Layered Horticultural Products

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 617
Author(s):  
Dong Hu ◽  
Yuping Huang ◽  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Lijian Yao ◽  
Zidong Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optical Properties ◽  
Optical Property ◽  
Optical Absorption ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Estimation Accuracy ◽  
Property Estimation ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Stepwise Method ◽  
Horticultural Products ◽  
Layered Samples

Spatial-frequency domain imaging (SFDI) is a wide-field, noncontact, and label-free imaging modality that is currently being explored as a new means for estimating optical absorption and scattering properties of two-layered turbid materials. The accuracy of SFDI for optical property estimation, however, depends on light transfer model and inverse algorithm. This study was therefore aimed at providing theoretical analyses of the diffusion model and inverse algorithm through numerical simulation, so as to evaluate the potential for estimating optical absorption and reduced scattering coefficients of two-layered horticultural products. The effect of varying optical properties on reflectance prediction was first simulated, which indicated that there is good separation in diffuse reflectance over a large range of spatial frequencies for different reduced scattering values in the top layer, whereas there is less separation in diffuse reflectance for different values of absorption in the top layer, and even less separation for optical properties in the bottom layer. To implement the nonlinear least-square method for extracting the optical properties of two-layered samples from Monte Carlo-generated reflectance, five curve fitting strategies with different constrained parameters were conducted and compared. The results confirmed that estimation accuracy improved as fewer variables were to be estimated each time. A stepwise method was thus suggested for estimating optical properties of two-layered samples. Four factors influencing optical property estimation of the top layer, which is the basis for accurately implementing the stepwise method, were investigated by generating absolute error contour maps. Finally, the relationship between light penetration depth and spatial frequency was studied. The results showed that penetration depth decreased with the increased spatial frequency and also optical properties, suggesting that appropriate selection of spatial frequencies for a stepwise method to estimate optical properties from two-layered samples provides potential for estimation accuracy improvement. This work lays a foundation for improving optical property estimation of two-layered horticultural products using SFDI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document