scholarly journals Strengthening clinical governance through cultivating the line management role

2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Balding

The implementation of clinical governance in health care services introduces increased responsibility and transparency around safety and quality into all staff roles. Encouraging staff to assume these responsibilities as part of their daily routine is fundamental to achieving effective clinical governance, and requires health care managers at all levels to embrace clinical governance leadership and management. Fostering this role will need to be approached skilfully if managers are to achieve effective leadership of clinical governance activities. This paper reviews the management and quality-related literature to explore how these roles may best be developed to ensure that health care managers are equipped and willing to undertake the critical task of translating clinical governance policy into day-to-day practice.

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Gary Strack ◽  
Myron D Fottler ◽  
Ann Osbourne Kilpatrick

This exploratory survey examines the relationship between selected dimensions of spirituality and self-perceived effective leadership practices of health-care managers. Kouzes and Posner's Leadership Practices Inventory and Beazley's Spiritual Assessment Scale were administered to a sample of health-care managers. Significant statistical relationships were found between and among the dimensions of both subscales. Analysis of variance revealed a statistically significant difference in three effective leadership practices by ‘more spiritual than non-spiritual’ managers. The confirmatory factor analysis of our theory-based model revealed a moderately positive correlation between spirituality and leadership ( r = 0.50). The paper concludes with a conceptual theory postulating a rationale for the relationship between spirituality and effective leadership.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruria Adini ◽  
Avi Israeli ◽  
Moran Bodas ◽  
Kobi Peleg

AbstractObjectiveThe study aimed to examine impact of think-tanks designed to create policies for emerging threats on medical teams’ perceptions of individual and systemic emergency preparedness.MethodsMulti-professional think-tanks were established to design policies for potential attacks on civilian communities. In total, 59 multi-sector health care managers participated in think-tanks focused on: (a) primary care services in risk zones; (b) hospital care; (c) casualty evacuation policies; (d) medical services to special-needs populations; and (e) services in a “temporary military-closed zone.” Participants rotated systematically between think-tanks. Perceived individual and systemic emergency preparedness was reviewed pre-post participation in think-tanks.ResultsA significant increase in perceived emergency preparedness pre-post-think-tanks was found in 8/10 elements including in perceived individual role proficiency (3.71±0.67 vs 4.60±0.53, respectively; P<0.001) and confidence in colleagues’ proficiency during crisis (3.56±0.75 vs 4.37±0.61, respectively; P<0.001). Individual preparedness and role perception correlates with systemic preparedness and proficiency in risk assessment.ConclusionsParticipation in policy-making impacts on individuals’ perceptions of empowerment including trust in colleagues’ capacities, but does not increase confidence in a system’s preparedness. Field and managerial officials should be involved in policy-making processes, as a means to empower health care managers and improve interfaces and self-efficacy that are relevant to preparedness and response for crises. (Disaster Med Public Health Prepardness. 2019;13:152–157)


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana J. Ferradas ◽  
G. Nicole Rider ◽  
Johanna D. Williams ◽  
Brittany J. Dancy ◽  
Lauren R. Mcghee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document