Soil and plant resistance effects on transpirational and leaf water responses by groundnut to soil water potential

Soil Research ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
RP Samui ◽  
S Kar
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Uptake ◽  
Plant Resistance ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Arachis Hypogea ◽  
Water Potentials ◽  
Soil Water Conditions

The phasic and diurnal leaf water potential (�L) and transpirational responses to soil water potential by groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) were investigated under controlled soil water conditions in a glasshouse. Three different soil water potentials (�s) in the tensiometric ranges were maintained in a lateritic sandy loam soil (Oxisol) during the seedling (S1), branching (S2) and peg formation (S3) stages of groundnut. Measured values of �s, �L rooting density, soil capillary conductivity and transpiration rate were used to calculate the soil and plant resistances to water uptake by the plant. The soil and plant resistances to water uptake by the groundnut plant increased appreciably as the soil water potential decreased from -0.11 to -0.70 bar. Plant resistance (Rp) was two to three orders of magnitude higher than soil resistance (Rs). Rs decreased with growth of the plant, whereas Rp increased, especially at -0.7 bar �s, Decreases in transpiration at �s lower than -0.33 bar were closely associated with the increases in the plant and soil resistances, and with lower leaf water potentials.

Impact of soil water potential pattern on root water uptake distribution and leaf water potential

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Mehmandoost Kotlar ◽  
Mathieu Javaux
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Root System ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Flow ◽  
Water Uptake ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Root Water Uptake ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Hydraulic Lift ◽  
Water Potentials

<p>Root water uptake is a major process controlling water balance and accounts for about 60% of global terrestrial evapotranspiration. The root system employs different strategies to better exploit available soil water, however, the regulation of water uptake under the spatiotemporal heterogeneous and uneven distribution of soil water is still a major question. To tackle this question, we need to understand how plants cope with this heterogeneity by adjustment of above ground responses to partial rhizosphere drying. Therefore, we use R-SWMS simulating soil water flow, flow towards the roots, and radial and the axial flow inside the root system to perform numerical experiments on a 9-cell gridded rhizotrone (50 cm×50 cm). The water potentials in each cell can be varied and fixed for the period of simulation and no water flow is allowed between cells while roots can pass over the boundaries. Then a static mature maize root architecture to different extents invaded in all cells is subjected to the various arrangements of cells' soil water potentials. R-SWMS allows determining possible hydraulic lift in drier areas. With these simulations, the variation of root water and leaf water potential will be determined and the role of root length density in each cell and corresponding average soil-root water potential will be statistically discussed.</p>

Transpiration and leaf water potentials of wheat in relation to changing soil water potential

1977 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 355 ◽  
Author(s):  
KA Seaton ◽  
JJ Landsberg ◽  
RH Sedgley
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Transpiration Rate ◽  
Water Conservation ◽  
Root Zone ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Stomatal Resistance ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Water Potentials

Changes in the transpiration rate of wheat in drying soils were followed in experiments in which plants were grown in two small weighable lysimeters in a glasshouse. Hourly measurements of soil water potential (Ψs) were made at three depths in each lysimeter. The water potential of flag leaves was measured with a pressure chamber, and stomatal resistance with a pressure drop porometer. Data on root densities and distribution were also obtained. Transpiration rates fell below estimated potential levels when the average value of Ψs in the root zone was reduced to –1 to –5 bars, depending on soil storage, root distribution and potential transpiration rate. From this point Ψs fell rapidly in the surface layers, more slowly at depth. It was found that accurate calculations of daily water uptake could be made from changes in soil water content. The minimum value of leaf water potential (�1 )attained each day declined progressively through the drying cycle, but there was evidence that stomatal resistance (rs) is not uniquely related to Ψ1; initial stomatal closure occurred at Ψ1, values which decreased from –11 to –25 bars as drying progressed. This adaptive mechanism is related to changes in osmotic potential of the leaves. Whole plant resistances (Rp), derived from leaf water potentials and fluxes through individual stems, increased as stem populations increased. In the high population lysimeter Rp decreased from 300 to 100 bar sec mm-3 as canopy transpiration rates increased from 1.5 to 4.5 x 10-4 mm sec-1. In the low population lysimeter Rp decreased from 70 to 30 bar sec mm-3 as transpiration increased from about 2.2 to 4.5 x 10-4 mm sec-1. The higher resistances appear to confer significant advantages in terms of water conservation and adaptation to drought.

scholarly journals Formulation of root water uptake in a multi-layer soil-plant model: does van den Honert's equation hold?

1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-P. Lhomme
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Uptake ◽  
Transpiration Rate ◽  
Plant Resistance ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Root Water Uptake ◽  
Layer Model ◽  
Ohm’S Law ◽  
Ohm's Law

Abstract. The withdrawal of water from soil by vegetation, which in steady state conditions is equivalent to the transpiration rate, can be written in terms of water potential in the form of an Ohm's law analogy, known as van den Honert's equation: The difference between an effective soil water potential and the bulk canopy water potential is divided by an effective soil-plant resistance. This equation is commonly used, but little is known about the precise definition of its parameters. The issue of this paper is to bridge the gap between the bulk approach and a multi-layer description of soil-plant water transfer by interpreting the bulk parameters in terms of the characteristics of the multi-layer approach. Water flow through an elementary path within the soil or the root is assumed to follow an Ohm's law analogy, and the soil and root characterisics are allowed to vary with depth. Starting from the basic equations of the multi-layer approach, it is proved that the total rate of transpiration can also be expressed in the form of an Ohm's law analogy. This means that van den Honert's equation holds at canopy scale, insofar as the assumptions made on the physics of root water uptake hold. In the bulk formulation derived, the effective soil-plant resistance appears as a combination of the elementary resistances making up the multi-layer model; and the effective soil water potential is a weighted mean of the water potentials in each soil layer, the weighting system involving the complete set of elementary resistances. Simpler representations of soil-plant interaction leading to Ohm's law type formulations are also examined: a simplified multi-layer model, in which xylem (root axial) resistance is neglected, and a bulk approach, in which soil-root interaction is represented by only one layer. Numerical simulations performed in different standard conditions show that these simpler representations do not provide accurate estimates of the transpiration rate, when compared to the values obtained by the complete algorithm.

NITROGEN TRANSFORMATIONS NEAR UREA IN SOIL WITH DIFFERENT WATER POTENTIALS

1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
YADVINDER SINGH ◽  
E. G. BEAUCHAMP
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Incubation Period ◽  
Relative Rate ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Nitrification Inhibitor ◽  
Silt Loam ◽  
Nitrogen Transformations ◽  
Water Potentials ◽  
Initial Soil

Two laboratory incubation experiments were conducted to determine the effect of initial soil water potential on the transformation of urea in large granules to nitrite and nitrate. In the first experiment two soils varying in initial soil water potentials (− 70 and − 140 kPa) were incubated with 2 g urea granules with and without a nitrification inhibitor (dicyandiamide) at 15 °C for 35 d. Only a trace of [Formula: see text] accumulated in a Brookston clay (pH 6.0) during the transformation of urea in 2 g granules. Accumulation of [Formula: see text] was also small (4–6 μg N g−1) in Conestogo silt loam (pH 7.6). Incorporation of dicyandiamide (DCD) into the urea granule at 50 g kg−1 urea significantly reduced the accumulation of [Formula: see text] in this soil. The relative rate of nitrification in the absence of DCD at −140 kPa water potential was 63.5% of that at −70 kPa (average of two soils). DCD reduced the nitrification of urea in 2 g granules by 85% during the 35-d period. In the second experiment a uniform layer of 2 g urea was placed in the center of 20-cm-long cores of Conestogo silt loam with three initial water potentials (−35, −60 and −120 kPa) and the soil was incubated at 15 °C for 45 d. The rate of urea hydrolysis was lowest at −120 kPa and greatest at −35 kPa. Soil pH in the vicinity of the urea layer increased from 7.6 to 9.1 and [Formula: see text] concentration was greater than 3000 μg g−1 soil. There were no significant differences in pH or [Formula: see text] concentration with the three soil water potential treatments at the 10th day of the incubation period. But, in the latter part of the incubation period, pH and [Formula: see text] concentration decreased with increasing soil water potential due to a higher rate of nitrification. Diffusion of various N species including [Formula: see text] was probably greater with the highest water potential treatment. Only small quantities of [Formula: see text] accumulated during nitrification of urea – N. Nitrification of urea increased with increasing water potential. After 35 d of incubation, 19.3, 15.4 and 8.9% of the applied urea had apparently nitrified at −35, −60 and −120 kPa, respectively. Nitrifier activity was completely inhibited in the 0- to 2-cm zone near the urea layer for 35 days. Nitrifier activity increased from an initial level of 8.5 to 73 μg [Formula: see text] in the 3- to 7-cm zone over the 35-d period. Nitrifier activity also increased with increasing soil water potential. Key words: Urea transformation, nitrification, water potential, large granules, nitrifier activity, [Formula: see text] production

scholarly journals Influence of Drought on Foliar Water Uptake Capacity of Temperate Tree Species

Forests ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen D.M. Schreel ◽  
Jonas S. von der Crone ◽  
Ott Kangur ◽  
Kathy Steppe
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Uptake ◽  
Tree Species ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Future Research ◽  
General Increase ◽  
Foliar Water Uptake ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Key Tree

Foliar water uptake (FWU) has been investigated in an increasing number of species from a variety of areas but has remained largely understudied in deciduous, temperate tree species from non-foggy regions. As leaf wetting events frequently occur in temperate regions, FWU might be more important than previously thought and should be investigated. As climate change progresses, the number of drought events is expected to increase, basically resulting in a decreasing number of leaf wetting events, which might make FWU a seemingly less important mechanism. However, the impact of drought on FWU might not be that unidirectional because drought will also cause a more negative tree water potential, which is expected to result in more FWU. It yet remains unclear whether drought results in a general increase or decrease in the amount of water absorbed by leaves. The main objectives of this study are, therefore: (i) to assess FWU-capacity in nine widely distributed key tree species from temperate regions, and (ii) to investigate the effect of drought on FWU in these species. Based on measurements of leaf and soil water potential and FWU-capacity, the effect of drought on FWU in temperate tree species was assessed. Eight out of nine temperate tree species were able to absorb water via their leaves. The amount of water absorbed by leaves and the response of this plant trait to drought were species-dependent, with a general increase in the amount of water absorbed as leaf water potential decreased. This relationship was less pronounced when using soil water potential as an independent variable. We were able to classify species according to their response in FWU to drought at the leaf level, but this classification changed when using drought at the soil level, and was driven by iso- and anisohydric behavior. FWU hence occurred in several key tree species from temperate regions, be it with some variability, which potentially allows these species to partly reduce the effects of drought stress. We recommend including this mechanism in future research regarding plant–water relations and to investigate the impact of different pathways used for FWU.

Modeling Soybean Leaf‐Water Potentials Under Nonlimiting Soil Water Conditions 1

1981 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Stanley ◽  
T. C. Kaspar ◽  
H. M. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Soil Water ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Water Potentials ◽  
Water Conditions ◽  
Soybean Leaf ◽  
Soil Water Conditions

A Model for Predicting Large Crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) Emergence as Influenced by Temperature and Water Potential

Weed Science ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. King ◽  
Lawrence R. Oliver
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Uptake ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Lag Phase ◽  
Subsequent Increase ◽  
Soil Temperatures ◽  
Emergence Percentage ◽  
Large Crabgrass

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of temperature and water potential on water uptake, germination, and emergence of large crabgrass in order to predict emergence in the field. Water uptake of seed soaked in polyethylene glycol solutions of 0 to −1400 kPa underwent an initial imbibition phase followed by a lag phase and subsequent increase in water content when radicles emerged from the seed. Maximum germination at 15 C was 12% at 0 kPa and 60% at 25 C at 0 to −200 kPa osmotic potential. In the growth chamber, large crabgrass emergence from soil began 2 to 3 d after planting at 30 or 35 C and within 9 to 10 d at 15 C. Maximum emergence of 77 % occurred at 25 C and at a soil water potential of −30 kPa. Emergence percentage decreased as water potential decreased or as temperature increased or decreased. A logistic equation described emergence of large crabgrass at each combination of temperature and soil water potential at which emergence occurred, and a predictive model was developed and validated by field data. In the field, there was little or no emergence at soil temperatures below 15 C or water potentials below −50 to −60 kPa. The model predicted the time of onset of large crabgrass emergence and the time to reach maximum emergence to within 2 to 4 d of that recorded in field experiments. The model also predicted the correct number of flushes of emergence occurring in the field in three of four experiments.

Leaf Gas Exchange and Water Relations of Lupins and Wheat. II. Root and Shoot Water Relations of Lupin During Drought-Induced Stomatal Closure

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 415 ◽  
Author(s):  
CR Jensen ◽  
IE Henson ◽  
NC Turner
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Transport ◽  
Water Uptake ◽  
Water Relations ◽  
Leaf Gas Exchange ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Root Water Uptake ◽  
Leaf Conductance

Plants of Lupinus cosentinii Guss. cv. Eregulla were grown in a sandy soil in large containers in a glasshouse and exposed to drought by withholding water. Under these conditions stomatal closure had previously been shown to be initiated before a significant reduction in leaf water potential was detected. In the experiments reported here, no significant changes were found in water potential or turgor pressure of roots or leaves when a small reduction in soil water potential was induced which led to a 60% reduction in leaf conductance. The decrease in leaf conductance and root water uptake closely paralleled the fraction of roots in wet soil. By applying observed data of soil water and root characteristics, and root water uptake for whole pots in a single-root model, the average water potential at the root surface was calculated. Potential differences for water transport in the soil-plant system, and the resistances to water flow were estimated using the 'Ohm's Law' analogy for water transport. Soil resistance was negligible or minor, whereas the root resistance accounted for 61-72% and the shoot resistance accounted for about 30% of the total resistance. The validity of the measurements and calculations is discussed and the possible role of root- to-shoot communication raised.

EFFECT OF SOIL WATER POTENTIAL AND BULK DENSITY ON WATER UPTAKE PATTERNS AND RESISTANCE TO FLOW OF WATER IN WHEAT PLANTS

1971 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. YANG ◽  
E. DE JONG
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Bulk Density ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Water Uptake ◽  
Water Movement ◽  
Soil Column ◽  
Soil Water Potential ◽  
Moisture Uptake ◽  
The Mathematical Model ◽  
Water Uptake Patterns

Water uptake patterns of wheat plants were studied in a growth chamber by using two soils packed to three different bulk densities. The resistances to water movement in the soil and in the plant were calculated from the mathematical model for water uptake published in the literature. When the capillary potential of the soils was near −⅓ bar, withdrawal of water by plants was relatively small and most of the water was taken from the top 25 cm of the soil column. As soil water potential decreased, water uptake increased progressively toward the lower part of the soil column. The resistance to water movement in the plant increased from the top to the bottom of the root system and increased with increasing bulk density of the soils. For wet soils, unrealistic values were obtained which could be due to the fact that the interaction between aeration and moisture uptake is not taken into account in the theoretical equations for moisture uptake.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document