scholarly journals Translatome analyses capture of opposing tissue-specific brassinosteroid signals orchestrating root meristem differentiation

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Vragović ◽  
Ayala Sela ◽  
Lilach Friedlander-Shani ◽  
Yulia Fridman ◽  
Yael Hacham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Meristem ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Critical Question ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Meristem Zone ◽  
Organ Level ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Context Specific ◽  
Opposing Effects ◽  
Spatiotemporal Integration

The mechanisms ensuring balanced growth remain a critical question in developmental biology. In plants, this balance relies on spatiotemporal integration of hormonal signaling pathways, but the understanding of the precise contribution of each hormone is just beginning to take form. Brassinosteroid (BR) hormone is shown here to have opposing effects on root meristem size, depending on its site of action. BR is demonstrated to both delay and promote onset of stem cell daughter differentiation, when acting in the outer tissue of the root meristem, the epidermis, and the innermost tissue, the stele, respectively. To understand the molecular basis of this phenomenon, a comprehensive spatiotemporal translatome mapping of Arabidopsis roots was performed. Analyses of wild type and mutants featuring different distributions of BR revealed autonomous, tissue-specific gene responses to BR, implying its contrasting tissue-dependent impact on growth. BR-induced genes were primarily detected in epidermal cells of the basal meristem zone and were enriched by auxin-related genes. In contrast, repressed BR genes prevailed in the stele of the apical meristem zone. Furthermore, auxin was found to mediate the growth-promoting impact of BR signaling originating in the epidermis, whereas BR signaling in the stele buffered this effect. We propose that context-specific BR activity and responses are oppositely interpreted at the organ level, ensuring coherent growth.

scholarly journals A unique histone 3 lysine 14 chromatin signature underlies tissue-specific gene regulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Regadas ◽  
Olle Dahlberg ◽  
Roshan Vaid ◽  
Oanh Ho ◽  
Sergey Belikov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulation ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Chromatin Signature ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Gene ◽  
Histone 3

scholarly journals Methylation of the Cyclin A1 Promoter Correlates with Gene Silencing in Somatic Cell Lines, while Tissue-Specific Expression of Cyclin A1 Is Methylation Independent

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 3316-3329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Müller ◽  
Carol Readhead ◽  
Sven Diederichs ◽  
Gregory Idos ◽  
Rong Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Cpg Island ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cyclin A1 ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Expression

ABSTRACT Gene expression in mammalian organisms is regulated at multiple levels, including DNA accessibility for transcription factors and chromatin structure. Methylation of CpG dinucleotides is thought to be involved in imprinting and in the pathogenesis of cancer. However, the relevance of methylation for directing tissue-specific gene expression is highly controversial. The cyclin A1 gene is expressed in very few tissues, with high levels restricted to spermatogenesis and leukemic blasts. Here, we show that methylation of the CpG island of the human cyclin A1 promoter was correlated with nonexpression in cell lines, and the methyl-CpG binding protein MeCP2 suppressed transcription from the methylated cyclin A1 promoter. Repression could be relieved by trichostatin A. Silencing of a cyclin A1 promoter-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) transgene in stable transfected MG63 osteosarcoma cells was also closely associated with de novo promoter methylation. Cyclin A1 could be strongly induced in nonexpressing cell lines by trichostatin A but not by 5-aza-cytidine. The cyclin A1 promoter-EGFP construct directed tissue-specific expression in male germ cells of transgenic mice. Expression in the testes of these mice was independent of promoter methylation, and even strong promoter methylation did not suppress promoter activity. MeCP2 expression was notably absent in EGFP-expressing cells. Transcription from the transgenic cyclin A1 promoter was repressed in most organs outside the testis, even when the promoter was not methylated. These data show the association of methylation with silencing of the cyclin A1 gene in cancer cell lines. However, appropriate tissue-specific repression of the cyclin A1 promoter occurs independently of CpG methylation.

Histones: genetic diversity and tissue-specific gene expression

1997 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Doenecke ◽  
W. Albig ◽  
C. Bode ◽  
B. Drabent ◽  
K. Franke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression

scholarly journals Blood—Brain Barrier Genomics

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Yi Li ◽  
Ruben J. Boado ◽  
William M. Pardridge
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Blood Brain Barrier ◽  
Brain Barrier ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Microvascular Endothelium ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Blood Brain ◽  
Tester Cdna

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is formed by the brain microvascular endothelium, and the unique transport properties of the BBB are derived from tissue-specific gene expression within this cell. The current studies developed a gene microarray approach specific for the BBB by purifying the initial mRNA from isolated rat brain capillaries to generate tester cDNA. A polymerase chain reaction–based subtraction cloning method, suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH), was used, and the BBB cDNA was subtracted with driver cDNA produced from mRNA isolated from rat liver and kidney. Screening 5% of the subtracted tester cDNA resulted in identification of 50 gene products and more than 80% of those were selectively expressed at the BBB; these included novel gene sequences not found in existing databases, ESTs, and known genes that were not known to be selectively expressed at the BBB. Genes in the latter category include tissue plasminogen activator, insulin-like growth factor-2, PC-3 gene product, myelin basic protein, regulator of G protein signaling 5, utrophin, IκB, connexin-45, the class I major histocompatibility complex, the rat homologue of the transcription factors hbrm or EZH1, and organic anion transporting polypeptide type 2. Knowledge of tissue-specific gene expression at the BBB could lead to new targets for brain drug delivery and could elucidate mechanisms of brain pathology at the microvascular level.

scholarly journals Classification of topological domains based on gene expression and regulation

Genome ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjing Zhao ◽  
Hongbo Shi ◽  
Nadav Ahituv
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Ontology ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Expression And Regulation ◽  
Genome Chromosome ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
Topological Domains ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Mouse Tissues

Tissue-specific gene expression is thought to be one of the major forces shaping mammalian gene order. A recent study that used whole-genome chromosome conformation assays has shown that the mammalian genome is divided into specific topological domains that are shared between different tissues and organisms. Here, we wanted to assess whether gene expression and regulation are involved in shaping these domains and can be used to classify them. We analyzed gene expression and regulation levels in these domains by using RNA-seq and enhancer-associated ChIP-seq datasets for 17 different mouse tissues. We found 162 domains that are active (high gene expression and regulation) in all 17 tissues. These domains are significantly shorter, contain less repeats, and have more housekeeping genes. In contrast, we found 29 domains that are inactive (low gene expression and regulation) in all analyzed tissues and are significantly longer, have more repeats, and gene deserts. Tissue-specific active domains showed some correlation with tissue-type and gene ontology. Domain temporal gene regulation and expression differences also displayed some gene ontology terms fitting their temporal function. Combined, our results provide a catalog of shared and tissue-specific topological domains and suggest that gene expression and regulation could have a role in shaping them.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document